We had one german customer with similar complaint - it turned out permissions issue - it could not access remote drive when run from isolated account, but local folders worked fine… I am sure you tried compressing to local drives as we said before?

Final is out:
http://dl.powerarchiver.com/2016/powarc160061.exe

Updated translations and smaller graphical changes to better fit various translations, etc, etc.

Thanks everyone!

@Keith:

Is the PowerArchiver customized version of BitDefender older than the retail version of BitDefender? Are updates also older? Is it also an OEM version for PowerArchiver customers only?

apsolutely not, it is latest version with latest updates, bitdefender updates more than 10 times per day…. if you have more questions, it would be better to open up another thread so we dont crowd this one as people will have hard time getting the info they care about.

Okay thanks, I’ll try it out.

Maybe Win Blue will change the tide… and haswell :-)

I use ZTE everyday working like a champ here :)

Any news on when the bug regarding the mru paths not appearing in the extract’s ‘extract to…’ list until the mouse cursor is moved over the space?

This was confirmed a while ago and put on the back burner is it is low priority.

Thanks for the latest final.

Thanks

DrT

@Amigage:

If I disable my AV it seems to work!!!

maybe report the issue to AV maker? They usually fix these issues…

Yeah, I just saw. Hope to give it a try on the weekend, time permitting. Good on ya guys.

@nikkho said in Poor compression of >20GB exe/msi/cab sample:

New record with Razor: 2,413,444 kB
https://encode.ru/threads/130-PowerArchiver?p=54599&viewfull=1#post54599

Yes, while we have been bickering here about DLLs and EXEs vs native implementations; someone has actually improved something :)

@spwolf:

so what about colors that you preffer? send us your screenshots!

Still playing with the formats, to be honest its great but doesnt work the way i imagined it to.

For example I cant easily say all:
“xls”, “csv”, “txt” is Yellow
“Mpeg”, Jpeg" is Blue
“SAP, MDB, DDB” is red.

But again… im still playing around.

One area i am trying to change is if a file is “csv” is doesnt class it as text on my system i would prefer it as a spreadsheet colour.

I know csv’s are text formatted but as i deal with csv’s every day and associate them with spreadsheets or database’s i would like the ability to choose.

I’ve just played with the presets, nothing major.

Ow it would also be good if I could Apply a colour to Archive’s as currently it’s set as text in colour?

It might just be that i dont understand the formating and settings… :)
attachment_p_29156_0_colprev1.jpg

@alextorex:

Hi I need this feature quite badly.
For example, I need to delete archives immediately after a archive is extracted so I can free up space for extracting another archive.
Also in case of creating archives I need to delete automatically files archived.
I don’t see how some other tool/script can do this since it does not know when Power Archiver finished an archive job in queue.

Please check “Extract Now” free software which supports this feature very well.

As a suggestion you could consider adding ability to run scripts triggered by events (archive job finished) and pass parameters to script with name of archive extracted (in case of extraction) or name of folder archived (in case of archiving).
I can understand that this feature can be quite problematic to implement but would give me some solution to write my own script.

Extract Now is truly the solution that I’ve been looking for… thank you so much for this recommendation!

Power Archive was such a good software to use for most things and for many years have been following its progress, but given that the most important thing we dont have these days is time, the feature that Extract Now gives for free is actually one of the top feature that I would have easily be willing to pay for… I’m so compelled to post this message because I feel strongly that this feature is a huge time saver and should be integrated into PA asap… the feature to ‘move’ original archive files ‘after’ its been extracted so that its not instantly deleted would have solved a lot of the concern people have of loosing something they’re not aware, it gives them the ability to double check that the extraction was successfull then they can just simply delete the ‘extracted archives’.

If most of the feature from Extract now could be build into PA, Power Archiver will be indeed the archiving software that is truly powerful. Right now I can breath easier knowing that things are going to be better for me after I found Extract Now… a software I would have been willing to pay good money for, even if its free its worth supporting. Currently letting it go thru the whole folders of archives and doing stuff that I would have normally had to do manually that is, unzip and delete over and over again. (could have written a batch file in dos probably to take care of it, but couldnt be bothered)

The problem is fixed here too. Good work.

But at least we’re clean. :p;):D

@Johnmoglas:

Why don’t we try to get rid of the numbers?In my opinion Power Archiver neo/beta/Alpha sounds cooler then Power Archiver 2012 or 2013!!

Using “Beta” “Alpha” are typical stages of development and you have them in every version developed.

And technically we do PowerArchiver - “Profesional”, “Legacy” and “Toolbox”.

Having Version numbers are really helpfull as it can give you an instant idea of the age of the product when you visit the site.

@Sir:

:-D you know… i thought while driving home what kind of answers you would come up with.

And I was bang on about you mentioning Vinyl. :)

Wasn’t difficult to guess, everyone knows that nothing beats the rich sound of vinyl. :cool:
@Sir:

you have shed some light on what has been a dark day.

I aim to please. :D

@Socrates:

11.5 has been out about a month; will the U3 version be far behind?

Hugh

i am glad everyone is waiting for USB version… it will be out after 11.51 :)

My pc specs with turbo up to 3.8ghz on air :). http://valid.canardpc.com/2891262

how about pff meaning powersarchiver file format

pff thats what i vote for

Ya Like I said it’s weird bug on my system that all. Windows 7 works great windows 8 not so good with cab support compress.

I’ll give it ago when im working on a Doc off Spreadsheet

@south37 said in PA crashes when using 1st char to select file:

Just tested the 1st char select with version 18.00.31. It is working correctly.

thank you very much for the report and follow ups

I agree on this . Do you have beta?

Cone, Inc.
latest PA release info on Sua bep tu tphcm | Sua bep hong ngoai hcm

you didnt get it eh? it was removed in .30 :).

and of course, day later we get an support request to remove D&D screen :-)

@TBGBe:

Not as such, but as PowerArchiver is Windows only; it is assumed that most members will be using Windows.

Yea, I tend to think of it as people or users not limited to Windows only – Helping users to get their computers up and running brought me to a lot of ‘places’ – need to learn them before I could give support –

@Carlos-Martin-Moreno said in inno/windows hangs during C:\Windows\system32\regsvr32.exe” /s "C:\Program Files\PowerArchiver\pashlext64.dll:

Experiencing the same thing when trying to deploy PA 2017 with SCCM.
If i run the cmd file locally on the computer it runs the installation smoothly, but when io try to deploy it the deployment crashes.
I have about 600computers that i need to deploy this program to so it would be nice if you could try to fix it.

keep in mind that PA 2017 is Beta 1 still… by final (in May?) there will also be MSI installation that will be easier to use for business/enterprise installations.

ok… everything seems to work now. I made a complete new pbs and scheduler job. This one runs now… No Idea why because it is exactly the same as the one one that didn’t run.

Thanks for the great support!!

latest web update fixes my shell ext. too.

Had no Pashlext.dll before.

fixed in latest beta

Downloaded and installed new version, ran a backup of VM files, then did a restore … 0 file is zero! VM loads ok.

Thanks.

@Sir:

Ok, what is this PB Richy…

I just thought it was a shorthand for “ProBably” (as in when/if he gets a new PC) :confused:

what i was trying to say to people is what if your internet connection goes down. if say the main server fom t crashes where do u get help on pa if its online

@Hagen:

Only when I select the Virtual Drive button.

thats is fine, i thought you were getting it in burner because thats what we were talking about previously :)… just do the Web Update via Help, and you will get latest VD drivers which i talked about :-).

awesome. I will keep this thread open just in case :).

thanks

Hello, this should be fixed in the latest update. Tested here and confirmed :)
You may update via Patchbeam or use this direct download link;
http://dl.powerarchiver.com/2015/powarc150304.exe

Please let us know and thanks for your help!

yep :-)

Not sure if that is a bug or if it will need a convert routine - but should be solved one way or the other.

@davidsplash:

its happed and theres no way point in arguing over wther it is right or wrong. Just support it, well you’ll have to in the end.

Yea, I’m tired of pointing out whether BZip2 or PPMd powered ZIP should be supported or not. Just let it be.

POWERARC -es testrar.rar … when ever i open it what should i do
technology

Voodooo :)

@Tyjen007 said in Windows 10 pro - Explorer crashing:

I’ve been checking event viewer, and have seen no crashes related to PASHLEXT64.DLL for nearly a week. I’m running PowerArchiver version 17.00.63 (03/17) 64bit and have recently upgraded to windows 10 1703 (Build 15063.rs2_release.170317-1834). What ever work that was done by ConeXware, seems to have addressed the crashing issue. Unless anything changes I would say, we can assume the issue (as far as my situation) is resolved. Thank you spwolf for your prompt responses.

thank you for the feedback.

@ckit:

Wow, if only Microsoft had you guys working for them maybe Windows 8 would have been better than the current train (metro) wreck….

well, they did come far away from 8.00. And this fall update should probably end up being called 9.0 :-).

I mean I bet I downloaded at least 15 GB of of Windows updates since the first official release. Maybe more.

I have the default ZIP and ZIPX set to “Move and replace.”

But when I drag a file either onto a ZIP icon or an open ZIP, the option is set to add and replace.

@moles42:

I just delete them,ban them and then I’m done with them and I wait for the next sucker to cross my path…:)

You have a Job here my friend! I think the average IQ in our IT Department is about 12 :-D " and im not joking! "

As a simple user i can say that Vista is very quick system but it need a lot of free place on pc that not everybody can provide

My wallpapers are more cooler, doubts?

ok, so you WinXp x64 users - make sure PA installs under Program Files and not Program Files (x86). Windows will not let shell extensions to run from x86 folder!

This is only valid for people who had already installed PA on the computer so PA’s installation will look at last installation folder. New installations will go into “64bit” Program files by default.

thanks!

@spwolf Indeed much faster!

@TBGBe:

Yeah, yeah - now tell us it’s faster too :p

Don’t see any “Repair Features” though :confused:

cant be faster… but our own unrar still is :-)

@wulffra:

a) Add Compress and Encrypt to selfextracting file (.exe) to context menu (now only pae), or allow this to be changed in he setup.
see: http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3537&highlight=context

b) Option: Delete .rars after successfull extraction

thanks

just update those threads, or create new ones… posting multiple wishes, in unrelated thread is a no no. :o

Problem resolved in RC 5 :D

@spwolf Well I can confirm that I have never again encountered any Bex64 errors while using 20.00.73 and now 20.10.02 versions. No bex in logs nor explorer.exe restart-refresh.

@spwolf , @Mili , @ivan and the rest team thanks for solving this one, powerarchiver is again the best utility

@drteeth:

but that has nothing to do with drag and drop.

That is what I was trying to say to the OP who posed that question.

DrT

ok, but still let it be said that we dont actually disable anything… Windows removes it itself once associations go to some other program… not our fault :-)

go on give us a sneaky peek ;)

My only wish is a very simple one, and I hope it’s easy enough to add:

http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3433

OK, sent the e-mail minutes ago

The german version 10.01.03 is not displaying the drag’n drop menu at all, like the version before.

With the english version I’ve the same issue as wallan37 and skypx.

email us at support so we can give you reg number as well OR if you purchased PA 2004 or before, you can login to your account and you will still be able to get PA 2004 from there.

thanks,

bumping this thread again, should be fixed in .22

let us know

@Mameluke:

With the new version I got a 4 second first start and instant subsequent starts.

Mame

Edit: Spelling

good…

check this out:
http://www.powerarchiver.com/test/release10/paop200.exe

it should fix the issue. Please report back if it did.

thanks!

did you login with your account? maybe your cookies get cleared and you need to login properly with your username/password. We dont ban anyone, only for spamming and there was definetly no need to ban you.

I doubt there is an issue with database since everyone elses account work fine.

thanks

@shahin said in Taskbar Progress Bar:

every time opening PowerArchiver a folder named “PowerArchiver 2018 (64-bit) (Unregistered)” is created in “C:\Users*\AppData\Roaming”. what’s this?

p.s. if you dont have PA 2018 license yet, let us know via support at conexware.com, you will get one for bug reporting, or extension of select plan. Thanks!

@skypx that’s even faster :-) and if you don’t use shell commands, you don’t even have to fix your registry :-)))))))))))))))))))

If I find something I’ll surely report it here.

x86 programs run perfectly (and start faster) on x64 system. Only thing not available is addressing over 2GB of memory.

Since in 2017 we are adding our own format where you can use more than 5-6 GB of memory, realistically, when needed, we are also adding full x64 version of PA.

Also, codecs built from grounds up might support faster instructions in x64, so with .pa format you will see up to 30% faster performance in x64 than in x86… for .zip, performance difference is nowhere as close, if any.

p.s. confusion here was that Vista and XP schedule options are different - Vista’s worked ok, while on XP it did not (should work now when you click on Edit!)

sorry, it was just to help…

good!

@adrianyujs Thanks you can also check ! https://arynews.tv/en/category/pakistan/

@Socrates:

I don’t know how you all do it. There are so many ways well-designed software can go wrong. As users we forget that it is not just the integrity of one piece of software, but how well it plays with everything else on every user’s machine.

Couldn’t agree more. :)

@spwolf:

You can help us test it here:
http://www.powerarchiver.com/test/release15/powarc150301.exe

We still did not have time to test it properly, so it would be helpful… thanks!

Yes, seems fine to me. :)

Thank you.

yes, we will try to make it work, but it has to be major release, not these small maintenance update…

ok, so this update is live for everyone (.20)… it is also different from your’s guido… but nothing related to SkyDrive or clouds…

:-)

anything other than this, write up new thread… for instance, separate wipe tool for deleting files securely? Wishlist forums :-)

@greeny:

Hi guys, I also complained about this a long time ago and with the new update v9.63.02 found that some of the files in use are added to ZIP correctly when highlighted and Right Mouse button-> Compress with Options is performed :)

However some files are skipped when using the Drag-and-drop in PA or using the PA graphical user interface to Add to a new archive :confused:

What is the difference ?

there shouldnt be any difference, it was never added.

Reminded by thw wishlist thread :
http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1371
@TBGBe:

with 35 subfolders:
Zip, BH, LZH, TAR - all OK

with 40 subfolders
Zip, BH, LZH - all OK
TAR - only 39 subfolders (last folder, in name order, is not present) :(

Note : All folders are empty (no files).
Checked compress via shell extension, for TAR I actually used TAR.GZ.
Problem (?) still in PA9.51.01 :(

Thank you, now it works! The message is gone.

This should be fixed in latest release:
http://powerarchiver.com/test/release13/powarc140503int.exe

Please let us know and thanks!