• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Can you include .3MF to the list of re-compressible formats?
    A

    Can you include .3MF to the list of re-compressible formats? Its structure is similar to MS Office 2007 documents and Open Document Format. It is a ZIP Deflate archive with XML data and some JPG, and/or PNG pictures inside. Otherwise, if I try to compress .3MF it bearly makes it smaller unless I recompress .3MF to the Store setting then it makes it a lot smaller.
    Wish they all would move to 7zip ZSTD in the first place so that the optimized file size with FileOptimizer would be 50% of the ZIP Deflate version. And there would be no extra compression needed :)

    Wishlist
    Optimize archive on Context Menu
    W

    I noticed that the option to add the optimize archive function to the context menu is missing on Windows 10.
    Opening each archive with the interface in order to click it becomes tedious with many files.

    Same for others functions like Remove Archive Encryption

    Wishlist

    "archive properties" context menu voice

    Wishlist
    7
    14
    12985
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • manuangiM
      manuangi
      last edited by

      sometimes I like to check the archive properties…and I have to open the archive in PA then click on the “properties” button (which I have enabled)…

      I think it would be good to have a context menu option for that, such as “Archive properties”

      what do you think?

      by the way…is there any way to put a shortcut in the \sendto folder, pointing directly to the Properties function…by a command line switch?
      sort of “\pa\powarc.exe /info”

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • manuangiM
        manuangi
        last edited by

        up

        no way?

        TBGBeT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • TBGBeT
          TBGBe @manuangi
          last edited by

          I agree, at the moment PA does not enable “info” unless it already has the archive open.
          Even using PA main window Explorer view.

          spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • spwolfS
            spwolf conexware @TBGBe
            last edited by

            Original archive info was done without explorer view in mind… Let us actually do new properties box and then we will see if we can do this as well. It is right now at the back of our 9.5 working list, so far.

            thanks,

            manuangiM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • manuangiM
              manuangi @spwolf
              last edited by

              9.5 running, but no changes about this?

              the best would be having a tab in the box opened via WindowsExplorer’s “Properties” menu voice, just as the archives associated with WinR** do (I love that feature, you don’t have to open the program to see the archive’s properties!)

              anything coming in the near future? it would be great!
              thank you!

              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                Ricco @manuangi
                last edited by

                Support this wish :)

                K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  klumy @Ricco
                  last edited by

                  good idea

                  another good idea, wpild be if the properties info would be shown up as tooltip in the windows explorer

                  J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jowood @klumy
                    last edited by

                    @klumy:

                    another good idea, wpild be if the properties info would be shown up as tooltip in the windows explorer

                    Full agree. Winzip shows these properties for years.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • manuangiM
                      manuangi @spwolf
                      last edited by

                      @spwolf:

                      Original archive info was done without explorer view in mind… Let us actually do new properties box and then we will see if we can do this as well. It is right now at the back of our 9.5 working list, so far.

                      thanks,

                      spwolf?

                      up

                      spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • spwolfS
                        spwolf conexware @manuangi
                        last edited by

                        we didnt finish new properties box… So, when it appears in PA, we will try to the shell extension for it as well.

                        thanks!

                        manuangiM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • manuangiM
                          manuangi @spwolf
                          last edited by

                          @spwolf:

                          we didnt finish new properties box… So, when it appears in PA, we will try to the shell extension for it as well.

                          thanks!

                          good, at least I’m happy to know you’ve been working on the feature :)

                          spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • spwolfS
                            spwolf conexware @manuangi
                            last edited by

                            bump

                            manuangiM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • manuangiM
                              manuangi @spwolf
                              last edited by

                              @spwolf:

                              bump

                              yea! you had promised ;)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C
                                Claude Renaud
                                last edited by

                                Ok, I vote for that too !

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post