• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Can you include .3MF to the list of re-compressible formats?
    A
    Can you include .3MF to the list of re-compressible formats? Its structure is similar to MS Office 2007 documents and Open Document Format. It is a ZIP Deflate archive with XML data and some JPG, and/or PNG pictures inside. Otherwise, if I try to compress .3MF it bearly makes it smaller unless I recompress .3MF to the Store setting then it makes it a lot smaller. Wish they all would move to 7zip ZSTD in the first place so that the optimized file size with FileOptimizer would be 50% of the ZIP Deflate version. And there would be no extra compression needed :)
    Wishlist
    Optimize archive on Context Menu
    W
    I noticed that the option to add the optimize archive function to the context menu is missing on Windows 10. Opening each archive with the interface in order to click it becomes tedious with many files. Same for others functions like Remove Archive Encryption
    Wishlist
    Support for Zstandard .zst/.zstd archives
    Z
    It would be nice to be able to at least extract Zstandard archives.
    Wishlist
    Highlighting files and folders in Add modes
    PA_FanP
    I prefer to use light themes, and when, for example, I have set up my main archive screen to be Classic Toolbar with Blizzard Blue, files in the archive are highlighted (no checkboxes, full row select) with white text on grey background. They are easy to see . However, in the Add screens, the files and folders are black type upon a pale blue background, which is not so readily visible, especially when highlighting separate files in lists with Ctrl/Click for addition. It would be ideal if the backgrounds to files in these screens could be set to mimic the highlighting of those in the main archive window. I have tried experimenting with different themes and settings for skins, toolbars and so forth, but, unless I’ve missed something, none seem to give me the effect I want.
    Wishlist
    .BH in Windows 11 Context Menu
    C
    Re: Windows 11 Context menu support It would really make me happy if you put .BH in the Windows 11 context menu. I know it’s in the “More Options” section, but this would make it more convenient. Don’t know why the option to add it to the menu isn’t there in the first place. P-L-E-A-S-E ??? :) Thanks You!
    Wishlist
    paq9a support
    R
    Any chance of including this format in a future release? https://github.com/FS-make-simple/paq9a Exceptional compression levels. Thanks.
    Wishlist
    Windows Store Delivery (and ideally updates)
    TheAndyMacT
    Now that the Windows Store is making support for non-UWP apps mainstream, including those with their own update delivery process, it would be nice to see PowerArchiver in the Windows Store going forwards - at least as a channel for the product to be available.
    Wishlist
    What features do you want in new format?
    spwolfS
    Tell us what features you want from new format…
    Wishlist
    Windows 11 Context menu support
    BigMikeB
    In Windows 11 a new explorer context menu is introduced. The “old” context menu may still be accessed through an additional mouse click, to reach the PowerArchiver context menu functions, but this isn’t comfortable at all. Could you add PowerArchiver items to the first level (and ideally disable the Windows native ZIP entry)
    Wishlist
    OneDrive for Business support
    Z
    I’m surprised that OneDrive for Business isn’t supported. I can’t link my company’s OneDrive account, but a personal (free) account works fine.
    Wishlist
    Better handling for protected archives
    BigMikeB
    Hi, I’d like to propose an improvement for password protected archives. Actual behavior is: If I open an archive, which is password protected and make a typo in the password dialog, I’ll get the message, that the password was wrong and I end up with an empty window. I need to reopen the archive to be able to enter the password again. Improved behavior: Tell me, that the password was wrong and give me the chance to enter the correct password to decrypt the archive.
    Wishlist
    ZIPX: Add support for packing JPEG with specialized algorithm
    A
    Hello! I know I have been asking for this feature some time ago, but as nothing has changed let me ask again: The ZIPX-format offers an algorithm, that compresses JPEG-files by about 20-30%. Please add compression (packing) support for this in ZIPX-archives to Powerarchiver. Extraction of JPEGs packed into ZIPX by this algorithm is already supported by Powerarchiver for a long time, so it should not be difficult? Or is it a licensing problem? Thanks!
    Wishlist
    Better archive type handling with drag & drop
    BigMikeB
    Hi, I’d like to suggest, that the correct archive type is (always) selected, when adding files by drag & drop to an archive. This is already happening if the archive has the correct extension. For example, if I’m adding files to test.zip, zip will be selected. If I’m adding files to test.7z, 7z will be selected as format in “Add dialog”. But this won’t be working, if the archive has not the “right” extension. So XPI files (Firefox addons) for example are ZIP files. PowerArchiver opens them without any problems, but if I try to add file by drag & drop, PowerArchiver won’t auto select “ZIP”, but use the last selected archive format, while PowerArchiver already knows, that I’m trying to add files to a ZIP.
    Wishlist
    Elevation of UAC in Mounting Images
    F
    I love this, only there is one problem. The UAC elevation feature does not extend to Mount Image option in the add-on software PA provided. It is most annoying whenever I am on highest UAC settings and I mount an ISO, every time I open and create a virtual drive UAC appears. I also do not want to completely disable UAC. Is adding UAC elevation for mount image feature possible?
    Wishlist
    Bulkzip Nanozip (.nz) file format
    D
    The now defunct Bulkzip had Nanozip (nz) as an option this would be great to have for compatibility with my .nz files, so I don’t have to install Bulkzip separately.
    Wishlist
    Include Virtual Drive as standalone in the installer
    2
    Hi. I noticed that when I want to run the Virtual Drive for the first time inside the PowerArchiver Burner it prompts to download it form the internet. I was wondering, would it be OK to include this utility straight into the offline installer to be able to set it up locally? Thank you!
    Wishlist
    Suggestion to improve .pa format
    Brian GregoryB
    How about recognising a few more (or all) of the file formats that are basically renamed zip files and treating them is if they are zip files. For instance Android .apk files are just renamed .zip files. Libreoffice/Openoffice ODF documents are all, as far as I am aware, just renamed .zip files. (.odt, .ott, .ods, .ots, .odp, .otp, .odb, .odf etc.)
    Wishlist
    Folder navigation
    drteethD
    I would like to make a further plea for my mouse’s backwards and forwards keys to work when navigating to and from files, just like they do in explorer. IIRC, I was told that this functionality would be added to v2019. Mni tnx.
    Wishlist
    Quake 1/2 .PAK file support
    AluminumHasteA
    I use PA for everything, if I can. Would be really nice to maybe get built in support for Quake 1/2 .pak files. More info on the format, seems simpler than I thought: https://quakewiki.org/wiki/.pak
    Wishlist
    Find file in archive.
    LuxorL
    Would it be possible at all in some future version perhaps, to have a “find file” function? Reason I ask is that I was looking for a certain file I knew existed in an archive, but I had to unzip it then use another tool to find the file. It would have saved that extra step if that function existed in PA itself.
    Wishlist

    Size saving idea

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Wishlist
    8 Posts 5 Posters 12.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D Offline
      davidsplash
      last edited by

      you could use plugins so people could download what archive support they require and make avaliable more formats that some people may never require.

      This would also help as some new features could be updated and modified thia there plugin rather than a whole rewrite of pa. Saves people down loading pa again when only one feature has been updated. Though you might have to if its a major update to the program.

      what does everyone else think.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        Jr heuwing
        last edited by

        Great idea !

        It is also easier when needed an translation, to use this way of updating.

        Maybe an option for PA 10 ? :D

        Greetz,

        JR Heuwing

        Keep looking for interesting software.

        ivanI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ivanI Offline
          ivan conexware @Jr heuwing
          last edited by

          Hm,

          Making whole application work with all formats as plug-ins would make application a lot more complicated - even to use it after we make it.

          The application itself should not be a lot smaller - maybe 1.0 MB (POWERARC.EXE) and 0.5 MB installation itself - althought you wouldn’t have to download all DLLs at one time.

          So without any formats support the installation should be around 1 MB but you definetelly need support for ZIP, TAR, 7-ZIP and RAR and then the installation rises up to 2.5 MB (estimated) which is not so big difference.

          But if you would like all the formats and we now have the installation should be even larger then 3 MB (since many DLLs and more complex POWERARC.EXE).

          On the other side, it would be easier to update - you could download only updated application, or updated DLLs for some format support.

          But again, this would make whole application, whole website more complex - most people (over 90%) like simple application without need to choose what to download and what not to download.

          manuangiM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • manuangiM Offline
            manuangi @ivan
            last edited by

            in that case, you might do as winamp: a light, a standard and a full version…so that the user would choose the one he likes the most!

            D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D Offline
              davidsplash @manuangi
              last edited by

              if you do what irfanview does. allow the user to download the program and standard supprt 7ip rar and 7zip and cab and the rtest can be optional by the end user through plugins .

              The problems are that while this would make the overall program bigger it will increase the usefullness of powerarchiver.

              The web site will be bigger but it would be better for all the support avaliable. It will save some users installing other archivers and then having problems latter on and reporting them as powerarchivers problems.

              manuangiM TBGBeT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • manuangiM Offline
                manuangi @davidsplash
                last edited by

                yes, and then…think that more and more people have a broadband connection…so the download file size’s not really a problem…

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • TBGBeT Offline
                  TBGBe @davidsplash
                  last edited by

                  Surely, if this approach was adopted then the basic PA package would be just the program (a sort of shell), with no compression formats.

                  Each compression format is then added via plug-in.

                  Unclear, but I guess there would be two plug-ins per format, one for compressing and the other for uncompressing - what about sfx, would that be a third plug-in? What about encryption? Not every format supports every feature.

                  Of course, each plug-in (format) should then be documented, advantages/disadvantages etc.

                  Presumably, the extras (skins and translation packs) would also have to be maintained/updated for each PA shell version as well as for the format plug-ins.

                  I can also forsee needing an Archive - old PA shell and compatible plug-ins (skins etc) for each version.

                  It is a nice philosophy when implemented from the beginning, but is there a benefit from PA side to change this now?

                  @davidsplash:

                  It will save some users installing other archivers and then having problems latter on and reporting them as powerarchivers problems.

                  Sorry, I don’t see how a plug-in philosophy will have any bearing on this :confused:

                  @manuangi:

                  think that more and more people have a broadband connection…so the download file size’s not really a problem.

                  Surely the point of using plug-ins is to avoid downloading the ones you do not want?
                  Braodband users will probably download them all anyway :p

                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D Offline
                    davidsplash @TBGBe
                    last edited by

                    you could install just the features you want and not the ones you don’t use.

                    Just look at winamp for example or irfanview which uses this philosophy plugins.

                    They are quicker to download and musch faster to adapt to changes in image/music formats.

                    It would help reduce the size due top the fact yuou only download and install the features you really need.

                    This would be a nice idea for pa as it would help make it easier for theym to maintain as if one part does not work they can disable it redoit or update it much quicker than it is now and you won’t have to download the whole of pa just for an update due to say 7zip

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post