-
It would be nice to be able to at least extract Zstandard archives.
-
I prefer to use light themes, and when, for example, I have set up my main archive screen to be Classic Toolbar with Blizzard Blue, files in the archive are highlighted (no checkboxes, full row select) with white text on grey background. They are easy to see .
However, in the Add screens, the files and folders are black type upon a pale blue background, which is not so readily visible, especially when highlighting separate files in lists with Ctrl/Click for addition. It would be ideal if the backgrounds to files in these screens could be set to mimic the highlighting of those in the main archive window.
I have tried experimenting with different themes and settings for skins, toolbars and so forth, but, unless I’ve missed something, none seem to give me the effect I want.
-
Re: Windows 11 Context menu support
It would really make me happy if you put .BH in the Windows 11 context menu. I know it’s in the “More Options” section, but this would make it more convenient. Don’t know why the option to add it to the menu isn’t there in the first place. P-L-E-A-S-E ??? :) Thanks You!
-
Any chance of including this format in a future release?
https://github.com/FS-make-simple/paq9a
Exceptional compression levels.
Thanks.
-
Now that the Windows Store is making support for non-UWP apps mainstream, including those with their own update delivery process, it would be nice to see PowerArchiver in the Windows Store going forwards - at least as a channel for the product to be available.
-
Tell us what features you want from new format…
-
In Windows 11 a new explorer context menu is introduced.
The “old” context menu may still be accessed through an additional mouse click, to reach the PowerArchiver context menu functions, but this isn’t comfortable at all.Could you add PowerArchiver items to the first level (and ideally disable the Windows native ZIP entry)
-
I’m surprised that OneDrive for Business isn’t supported. I can’t link my company’s OneDrive account, but a personal (free) account works fine.
-
Hi,
I’d like to propose an improvement for password protected archives.
Actual behavior is:
If I open an archive, which is password protected and make a typo in the password dialog, I’ll get the message, that the password was wrong and I end up with an empty window. I need to reopen the archive to be able to enter the password again.Improved behavior:
Tell me, that the password was wrong and give me the chance to enter the correct password to decrypt the archive. -
Hello!
I know I have been asking for this feature some time ago, but as nothing has changed let me ask again:
The ZIPX-format offers an algorithm, that compresses JPEG-files by about 20-30%. Please add compression (packing) support for this in ZIPX-archives to Powerarchiver. Extraction of JPEGs packed into ZIPX by this algorithm is already supported by Powerarchiver for a long time, so it should not be difficult? Or is it a licensing problem?
Thanks! -
Hi,
I’d like to suggest, that the correct archive type is (always) selected, when adding files by drag & drop to an archive.
This is already happening if the archive has the correct extension. For example, if I’m adding files to test.zip, zip will be selected. If I’m adding files to test.7z, 7z will be selected as format in “Add dialog”.
But this won’t be working, if the archive has not the “right” extension.
So XPI files (Firefox addons) for example are ZIP files. PowerArchiver opens them without any problems, but if I try to add file by drag & drop, PowerArchiver won’t auto select “ZIP”, but use the last selected archive format, while PowerArchiver already knows, that I’m trying to add files to a ZIP. -
I love this, only there is one problem. The UAC elevation feature does not extend to Mount Image option in the add-on software PA provided. It is most annoying whenever I am on highest UAC settings and I mount an ISO, every time I open and create a virtual drive UAC appears. I also do not want to completely disable UAC.
Is adding UAC elevation for mount image feature possible?
-
The now defunct Bulkzip had Nanozip (nz) as an option this would be great to have for compatibility with my .nz files, so I don’t have to install Bulkzip separately.
SQX format support
-
Hi,
please add full support for the ‘SQX’ format. It’s a powerfull and free compression format.
http://www.sqx-archiver.orgComparison to other formats (sorry the page is only available in german):
http://ww.speedproject.de/squeez/tour2b.html -
I can’t vote in this poll :(
You may not vote on this poll
-
It seems that the SQX format offers nearly the same compression ratio as 7z and it has some nice features that 7z does not have:
- Internal and external data recovery records
- High speed audio (WAV) compressor
- Real multivolume support
- Multivolume SFX support
- Support for digitally signed archives
- Independent encryption of archive directories
- Archive and file comments
- Updating of solid archives
It can be used free of charge, but it is not open source as 7z. But beside the fact that Ivan Pavlov is the only one who adds new features and fixes bugs that should not be a great disadvantage. ;)
-
Continued from http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1437
works the same as every other solid format btw - if you want to update file, whole archive needs to be re-compressed, so basically it is hardly an updating :-). Same goes with extracting files, other files need to be extracted as well.
First of all, it’s not a nice attitude to close every thread if you don’t like it.
It’s correct that the whole archive needs to be re-compressed, but the SQX archiver does it automatically for you. So the user doesn’t need to know if an archive is a solid archive or not.
If you want to update a solid 7z archive you have to extract all files first and then create a new archive with the updated files. For SQX you only have to add the new file(s), SQX archiver extracts the archive to a temp directory and recompress the old files (without the files to be updated) and the new files in one step.
You say that you won’t add another non-open source format. So why you don’t implement this feature for 7z and use the advantages of open source you refer always?
-
It seems that the SQX format offers nearly the same compression ratio as 7z and it has some nice features that 7z does not have:
- Internal and external data recovery records
- High speed audio (WAV) compressor
- Real multivolume support
- Multivolume SFX support
- Support for digitally signed archives
- Independent encryption of archive directories
- Archive and file comments
- Updating of solid archives
It can be used free of charge, but it is not open source as 7z. But beside the fact that Ivan Pavlov is the only one who adds new features and fixes bugs that should not be a great disadvantage. ;)
advantage of open source is not that many people can update it, it is that not one person can control it. 5 years from now, if Igor decides that he wont develop 7zip anymore, anyone can still do it. If there is some huge issue that exposes vulnerability of engine, with non-open source, we might not be able to fix it ever, if we dont have the source.
If particular format has no advantages over existing formats, then we will not add it. Why would we? Just to have another format on the check list? That is very confusing for users.
-
Continued from http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1437
First of all, it’s not a nice attitude to close every thread if you don’t like it.
It’s correct that the whole archive needs to be re-compressed, but the SQX archiver does it automatically for you. So the user doesn’t need to know if an archive is a solid archive or not.
If you want to update a solid 7z archive you have to extract all files first and then create a new archive with the updated files. For SQX you only have to add the new file(s), SQX archiver extracts the archive to a temp directory and recompress the old files (without the files to be updated) and the new files in one step.
You say that you won’t add another non-open source format. So why you don’t implement this feature for 7z and use the advantages of open source you refer always?
it is an bug thread about bugs, which has been resolved. you can discuss about wishes in this forums. This is why thread has been closed.
we could automatically re-compress 7zip and cab archives, it is not the feature of any particular format but there are few big issues there such as re-compressing anything larger than 10-20 mb might take an huge amount of time and another fact that we cant use old settings such as password as such, which is an security issue, user has to re-enter everything again.
most people would think it is an bug to take an hour to update 10 kb file inside 100 mb archive.
-
p.s. there will be an plugin system in PA eventually, so anyone will be able to add their own format (or format they like) to PA :-).
-
If particular format has no advantages over existing formats, then we will not add it. Why would we? Just to have another format on the check list? That is very confusing for users.
- Internal and external data recovery records
- High speed audio (WAV) compressor
- Real multivolume support
- Multivolume SFX support
- Support for digitally signed archives
- Archive and file comments
- Updating of solid archives
Hmm, it seems that SQX have many advantages…
we could automatically re-compress 7zip and cab archives, it is not the feature of any particular format but there are few big issues there such as re-compressing anything larger than 10-20 mb might take an huge amount of time and another fact that we cant use old settings such as password as such, which is an security issue, user has to re-enter everything again.
If you could then you should. How often do you create archives larger than 20 mb for daily use?
most people would think it is an bug to take an hour to update 10 kb file inside 100 mb archive.
It takes one hour to extract and recompress an 100 mb archive? Are you still working with Pentium 2 computers? ;)
I just tested it with an 5 mb archive. It took 25 seconds.
p.s. there will be an plugin system in PA eventually, so anyone will be able to add their own format (or format they like) to PA :-).
Nice to read, but when? PA 2008 or earlier? ;)
-
if you are using maximum compression, yes it takes a long time. Try at ultra setting for 100 MB file. Now imagine if you will want to use this to update 10 kb text file.
If you are compressing small files, then using some other format like zip is much smarter choice anyway. It is faster, and about billion of computers can extract it. You dont have to download some specific utility in order to read them.
-
Nice to read, but when? PA 2008 or earlier? ;)
PA 2008 isnt that far away, but i was hoping sooner. So much work though and troubleshooting. At the same time, you will be able to add any format you wish, which will clear up the wishlist queue :p
-
If you are compressing small files, then using some other format like zip is much smarter choice anyway. It is faster, and about billion of computers can extract it. You dont have to download some specific utility in order to read them.
Why it is a smarter choice? Especially for compressing many files solid archives are a big plus. I want to use solid archives and I want to update these archives. A smarter program would make it possible.
-
Why it is a smarter choice? Especially for compressing many files solid archives are a big plus. I want to use solid archives and I want to update these archives. A smarter program would make it possible.
Be careful, you wouldn’t want to “stray off topic” again, updating solid archives IS possible in SQX (the topic of this thread) :D
@jowood:You say that you won’t add another non-open source format. So why you don’t implement this feature for 7z and use the advantages of open source you refer always?
Updating solid 7z files has been in wishlist for some time, see
http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=598 -
Why it is a smarter choice? Especially for compressing many files solid archives are a big plus. I want to use solid archives and I want to update these archives. A smarter program would make it possible.
you are right, we just did not want to deal with problems of adding it before. Of course, few nicer words would work even better :-).
-
I used a program called Squeez which supports the SQX format.
Compression takes longer than 7-ZIP!
7-ZIP still has the better compression in most of my tests!
When SQX is smaller, the difference is only about 2%.
Ultra compression settings were used.I used a 3 GHz PC, so if something takes long, it’s a problem!
Frankly, 7-ZIP is still the boss!
