• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Can you include .3MF to the list of re-compressible formats?
    A
    Can you include .3MF to the list of re-compressible formats? Its structure is similar to MS Office 2007 documents and Open Document Format. It is a ZIP Deflate archive with XML data and some JPG, and/or PNG pictures inside. Otherwise, if I try to compress .3MF it bearly makes it smaller unless I recompress .3MF to the Store setting then it makes it a lot smaller. Wish they all would move to 7zip ZSTD in the first place so that the optimized file size with FileOptimizer would be 50% of the ZIP Deflate version. And there would be no extra compression needed :)
    Wishlist
    Optimize archive on Context Menu
    W
    I noticed that the option to add the optimize archive function to the context menu is missing on Windows 10. Opening each archive with the interface in order to click it becomes tedious with many files. Same for others functions like Remove Archive Encryption
    Wishlist
    Support for Zstandard .zst/.zstd archives
    Z
    It would be nice to be able to at least extract Zstandard archives.
    Wishlist
    Highlighting files and folders in Add modes
    PA_FanP
    I prefer to use light themes, and when, for example, I have set up my main archive screen to be Classic Toolbar with Blizzard Blue, files in the archive are highlighted (no checkboxes, full row select) with white text on grey background. They are easy to see . However, in the Add screens, the files and folders are black type upon a pale blue background, which is not so readily visible, especially when highlighting separate files in lists with Ctrl/Click for addition. It would be ideal if the backgrounds to files in these screens could be set to mimic the highlighting of those in the main archive window. I have tried experimenting with different themes and settings for skins, toolbars and so forth, but, unless I’ve missed something, none seem to give me the effect I want.
    Wishlist
    .BH in Windows 11 Context Menu
    C
    Re: Windows 11 Context menu support It would really make me happy if you put .BH in the Windows 11 context menu. I know it’s in the “More Options” section, but this would make it more convenient. Don’t know why the option to add it to the menu isn’t there in the first place. P-L-E-A-S-E ??? :) Thanks You!
    Wishlist
    paq9a support
    R
    Any chance of including this format in a future release? https://github.com/FS-make-simple/paq9a Exceptional compression levels. Thanks.
    Wishlist
    Windows Store Delivery (and ideally updates)
    TheAndyMacT
    Now that the Windows Store is making support for non-UWP apps mainstream, including those with their own update delivery process, it would be nice to see PowerArchiver in the Windows Store going forwards - at least as a channel for the product to be available.
    Wishlist
    What features do you want in new format?
    spwolfS
    Tell us what features you want from new format…
    Wishlist
    Windows 11 Context menu support
    BigMikeB
    In Windows 11 a new explorer context menu is introduced. The “old” context menu may still be accessed through an additional mouse click, to reach the PowerArchiver context menu functions, but this isn’t comfortable at all. Could you add PowerArchiver items to the first level (and ideally disable the Windows native ZIP entry)
    Wishlist
    OneDrive for Business support
    Z
    I’m surprised that OneDrive for Business isn’t supported. I can’t link my company’s OneDrive account, but a personal (free) account works fine.
    Wishlist
    Better handling for protected archives
    BigMikeB
    Hi, I’d like to propose an improvement for password protected archives. Actual behavior is: If I open an archive, which is password protected and make a typo in the password dialog, I’ll get the message, that the password was wrong and I end up with an empty window. I need to reopen the archive to be able to enter the password again. Improved behavior: Tell me, that the password was wrong and give me the chance to enter the correct password to decrypt the archive.
    Wishlist
    ZIPX: Add support for packing JPEG with specialized algorithm
    A
    Hello! I know I have been asking for this feature some time ago, but as nothing has changed let me ask again: The ZIPX-format offers an algorithm, that compresses JPEG-files by about 20-30%. Please add compression (packing) support for this in ZIPX-archives to Powerarchiver. Extraction of JPEGs packed into ZIPX by this algorithm is already supported by Powerarchiver for a long time, so it should not be difficult? Or is it a licensing problem? Thanks!
    Wishlist
    Better archive type handling with drag & drop
    BigMikeB
    Hi, I’d like to suggest, that the correct archive type is (always) selected, when adding files by drag & drop to an archive. This is already happening if the archive has the correct extension. For example, if I’m adding files to test.zip, zip will be selected. If I’m adding files to test.7z, 7z will be selected as format in “Add dialog”. But this won’t be working, if the archive has not the “right” extension. So XPI files (Firefox addons) for example are ZIP files. PowerArchiver opens them without any problems, but if I try to add file by drag & drop, PowerArchiver won’t auto select “ZIP”, but use the last selected archive format, while PowerArchiver already knows, that I’m trying to add files to a ZIP.
    Wishlist
    Elevation of UAC in Mounting Images
    F
    I love this, only there is one problem. The UAC elevation feature does not extend to Mount Image option in the add-on software PA provided. It is most annoying whenever I am on highest UAC settings and I mount an ISO, every time I open and create a virtual drive UAC appears. I also do not want to completely disable UAC. Is adding UAC elevation for mount image feature possible?
    Wishlist
    Bulkzip Nanozip (.nz) file format
    D
    The now defunct Bulkzip had Nanozip (nz) as an option this would be great to have for compatibility with my .nz files, so I don’t have to install Bulkzip separately.
    Wishlist
    Include Virtual Drive as standalone in the installer
    2
    Hi. I noticed that when I want to run the Virtual Drive for the first time inside the PowerArchiver Burner it prompts to download it form the internet. I was wondering, would it be OK to include this utility straight into the offline installer to be able to set it up locally? Thank you!
    Wishlist
    Suggestion to improve .pa format
    Brian GregoryB
    How about recognising a few more (or all) of the file formats that are basically renamed zip files and treating them is if they are zip files. For instance Android .apk files are just renamed .zip files. Libreoffice/Openoffice ODF documents are all, as far as I am aware, just renamed .zip files. (.odt, .ott, .ods, .ots, .odp, .otp, .odb, .odf etc.)
    Wishlist
    Folder navigation
    drteethD
    I would like to make a further plea for my mouse’s backwards and forwards keys to work when navigating to and from files, just like they do in explorer. IIRC, I was told that this functionality would be added to v2019. Mni tnx.
    Wishlist
    Quake 1/2 .PAK file support
    AluminumHasteA
    I use PA for everything, if I can. Would be really nice to maybe get built in support for Quake 1/2 .pak files. More info on the format, seems simpler than I thought: https://quakewiki.org/wiki/.pak
    Wishlist
    Find file in archive.
    LuxorL
    Would it be possible at all in some future version perhaps, to have a “find file” function? Reason I ask is that I was looking for a certain file I knew existed in an archive, but I had to unzip it then use another tool to find the file. It would have saved that extra step if that function existed in PA itself.
    Wishlist

    Native 64-bit support

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Wishlist
    28 Posts 7 Posters 28.9k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • RJWaringR Offline
      RJWaring @spwolf
      last edited by

      I have to agree with Spwolf, I personally see no point in re writing PowerArchiver to another model supporting 64Bit.

      The team at PA strive above any other Archive tool to interact with their customers in order to resolve, fix, develop and improve the service and features of their application.

      This interaction has in its self created a significant increase in usability and speed.

      All this without the need of 64bit.

      Microsoft’s Primary reason to move their OS to 64bit is due Memory, Security and Cost. But they will still have to support software running on 32bit for Decades to come… And if you do your research the 64bit Processor was actually invented and used in super computers around the 1960’s. It wasn’t until 2003 that AMD and Intel adapted the technology to be used within the PC.

      That’s 5 Decades so working on that timeframe who knows how compression algorithms will develop and by that time PA would have adapted their software to suite.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • drteethD Offline
        drteeth
        last edited by

        The only time the move to 64 bit will HAVE to be made is when a 64 bit version of Windows is released which will NOT run 32 bit apps. 64 bit is NOT obligatory or necessary at the moment at all. 32-bit apps still get several memory benefits running under a 64 BIT OS.

        Talking of speed of 64 bit apps…a programmer told me that even the 64 bit version of office 2010 uses a 32 bit subsystem (MAPI interface) and that also holds back any speed ups.

        DrT

        twphoenixT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • twphoenixT Offline
          twphoenix @drteeth
          last edited by

          Hello,

          i still think the task to support native x64 should be made.
          even if there is only a 5% - 8% Speed Inrcrease of Compression/Decompression.

          I Have different Archivers Running on Windows 7 x64 and Windows 7 x86 (on my Notebook, will switch later because i need more RAM)

          Powerarchiver 11.64
          WinRAR 3.93
          and
          Squeez 5.62

          On x86 Windows Powerarchiver is the Fastest, closely followed by WinRAR then in the last Place Squeez because it has no Multicore Support is the slowest.

          On my x64 Windows WinRAR x64 is the Fastest then comes Powerarchiver and then Squeez witch runs as a Native x64 App - It Still can Keep Up even if the Development Stopped.

          drteethD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • spwolfS Offline
            spwolf conexware
            last edited by

            there is no difference in WR 32bit and 64bit when it comes to extraction, i tested it when we made our improvements to unrar.

            twphoenixT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • spwolfS Offline
              spwolf conexware
              last edited by

              ie there will be no 5-8% improvement due to 64 bit… but there are improvements to be found in general optimizations to be sure, probably even greater than that…

              We will have to make 64bit version once 64bit delphi compiler comes out, mostly because it is marketing - you cant convince people there are no tangible differences :)… It is easier to advertise “64bit version - faster and more secure!!!”.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • twphoenixT Offline
                twphoenix @spwolf
                last edited by

                Hello,

                that maybe so for Extraction/Decompression but on my PC the Compression is faster not by much but Still faster.

                Ok. That Delphi (or RAD Studio) still no x64 Compiler has is strange and is a Problem. So I guess we have to wait.

                spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • spwolfS Offline
                  spwolf conexware @twphoenix
                  last edited by

                  @twphoenix:

                  Hello,

                  that maybe so for Extraction/Decompression but on my PC the Compression is faster not by much but Still faster.

                  indeed - it is faster for sure, i tested it - we are talking about WR though, so you cant compare it to PA directly :).

                  but here is the thing - we managed to make much bigger improvements in 32bit (and 32bit in 64bit OS) with general optimizations in unrar, so i would guess if we could create rars, we could do similar types of improvements as well :).

                  twphoenixT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • twphoenixT Offline
                    twphoenix @spwolf
                    last edited by

                    @spwolf:

                    indeed - it is faster for sure, i tested it - we are talking about WR though, so you cant compare it to PA directly :).

                    That is so with most of the Archivers or Compression Programms. :-) Even if You could compare them because they can compress the same formats. There is still no direct Comparsion possible.

                    @spwolf:

                    but here is the thing - we managed to make much bigger improvements in 32bit (and 32bit in 64bit OS) with general optimizations in unrar, so i would guess if we could create rars, we could do similar types of improvements as well :).

                    Yes. I think you could. ;-) Witch is why i also bought Powerarchiver. If you also could add some features i need witch are present in the Other Archivers i think i could and would Stop using WinRAR and Squeez.

                    Best Regards,

                    R. Landscheidt

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • spwolfS Offline
                      spwolf conexware
                      last edited by

                      well post away with the wishes so we can know what you want!

                      twphoenixT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • twphoenixT Offline
                        twphoenix @spwolf
                        last edited by

                        Hello,

                        Well i think i posted them in "What format next? December 2009) but i’l make an new Thread with them.

                        spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • drteethD Offline
                          drteeth @twphoenix
                          last edited by

                          @twphoenix:

                          Hello,

                          i still think the task to support native x64 should be made.
                          even if there is only a 5% - 8% Speed Inrcrease of Compression/Decompression.

                          I wonder how you managed to measure those differences. <10% is not noticeable in general use.

                          DrT

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • spwolfS Offline
                            spwolf conexware @twphoenix
                            last edited by

                            @twphoenix:

                            Hello,

                            Well i think i posted them in "What format next? December 2009) but i’l make an new Thread with them.

                            one thread per major wish, thats much easier for us to keep track of things…

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • spwolfS Offline
                              spwolf conexware
                              last edited by

                              Here you go:
                              http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4867

                              new thoughts on 32bit or 64bit dilemma… post away!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • spwolfS Offline
                                spwolf conexware
                                last edited by

                                64bit engine version for new PAF? Vote away here:
                                http://ideas.powerarchiver.com/

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S Offline
                                  splash3313
                                  last edited by

                                  I know I might be going over new ground but correct me if I’m wrong.

                                  doesn’t powerarchiver need to access file management tools to get files. File managers need to access the 64bit windows file system why doesn’t powerarchiver?

                                  spwolfS Brian GregoryB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • spwolfS Offline
                                    spwolf conexware @splash3313
                                    last edited by

                                    @splash3313 said in Native 64-bit support:

                                    I know I might be going over new ground but correct me if I’m wrong.

                                    doesn’t powerarchiver need to access file management tools to get files. File managers need to access the 64bit windows file system why doesn’t powerarchiver?

                                    As mentioned recently on forums, x64 is coming with PA 2017.

                                    But as to your question, PA 2016 already has x64 parts such as shell extensions so it works properly. PA 2017 will be full x64 so we can address more than 2 GB of memory for new format.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Brian GregoryB Offline
                                      Brian Gregory Alpha Testers @splash3313
                                      last edited by Brian Gregory

                                      @splash3313 Ah, so you’re one of those weirdos that denies that 32 bit software runs on 64 bit Windows :-)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S Offline
                                        splash3313
                                        last edited by

                                        Actually 32 bit software will run just will have problems on 64bit computers when it comes to file management not my words microsofts.

                                        Brian GregoryB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Brian GregoryB Offline
                                          Brian Gregory Alpha Testers @splash3313
                                          last edited by

                                          @splash3313 Can you provide a reference for that please?

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • S Offline
                                            splash3313 @Brian Gregory
                                            last edited by

                                            @Brian-Gregory https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20081222-00/?p=19763/

                                            basicalyl the link is old but gets to the point that a 64bit operating system use emulation to run 32 bit software.

                                            http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/32-bit-64-bit-operating-systems/

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post