Navigation

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Config settings doesn't impact PA behaviour...

      pirrbe

      PA2023 Win10, (same problem with older releases but never reported)
      PA Soft is installed on partition D. (exclusive for installed progs)
      Then I created on my partition G: the folders as configured in PA Settings ‘Folders’.

      0fcf1b09-1b91-4b74-b250-f8cf908a3348-Ashampoo_Snap_maandag 20 maart 2023_11h54m34s.png

      Screenshot 2023-03-20 121152.png

      The problem : Any activity on PA is saved in these folders…
      PA ignores them and still use the default settings. Whats wrong ? Regards, Pirrbe

      Tech Support
    • Missing pdf markups in pdf preview

      L

      I am still using Powerarchiver 2022 and it does not show pdf markups in the preview. Is there a setting to get version 2022 to show pdf markups in the preview? If not, does this work in version 2023?

      Tech Support
    • Question about PA Files...

      T

      The question that I have about PA archives is what happens if say ConeXware, as a company, dies in the future? What happens to any PA files that are created today? Can these files be decompressed with a copy of a PowerArchiver that can no longer phone home to the mothership thus can’t be registered or activated?

      I mean, I can understand that new PA files wouldn’t be able to be created if the program isn’t registered but what about an un-registered copy because well, the question that I posed above?

      It’s questions like this that make me not want to store anything really valuable in PA files out of fear that I, at some point in the future, might lose access to said data inside those files. OK, 7ZIP might not be able to compress as heavily as PA but at least it’s open source and any 7ZIP files will still be able to be read and decompressed ten, twenty, or fifty years from now.

      Tech Support
    • Functions in Windows 11 context menu no longer work after last Windows Update

      T

      For some reason, the PowerArchiver functions in the Windows 11 context menu no longer work after the last Windows Update. Only the functions in the classic context menu function as they should.

      I’ve tried uninstalling PowerArchiver and using RevoUninstaller to remove all bits and pieces that were left behind and did a clean install of PowerArchiver, it didn’t fix the issue. Other items in the Windows 11 context menu work.

      Tech Support
    • Multi Extract doesn't extract in parallel in Windows 11

      Z

      Is this a known problem? Is there a fix coming? This is a primary reason I buy PA.

      I’ve tried both methods I know to extract multiple zips at the same time. 1) Multi Extract feature in the GUI. 2) In Windows File Explorer, select multiple zips, right click, use PA context menu to Extract or Extract To…

      Is there a setting I missed? Or maybe it really is processing in parallel, but I can’t detect it? Nothing tells me in the Processes in Task Manager that multiple PA extracts are running. And my CPU, memory and disk resources do not look like a lot of extracts are running.

      I’m using PA 2022 Standard version 21.00.18 on Windows 11 Pro version 10.0.22621 Build 22621.

      Tech Support
    • Functions in Windows 11 Context Menu don't work in some directories

      P

      In the latest version of PA, on W11 (latest build/SP) when you try to use the first level context menu - NOTHING HAPPENS (particularly when you do this from Downloads or Documents folders) - however I noticed that it DOES WORK when you use the context menu from the Desktop. Going to the second level context menu does work however.

      Tech Support
    • PA 2023 Preview versus PA2022

      pirrbe

      Is the version Preview 2023 also considered to be tested by the testteam ? In the past we got messages in the forum for testing out version x.x, to be downloaded by fastring, or I missed the one for 2023. (I discovered 2023 on the official web…)
      CU, Pirrbe

      .

      Tech Support
    • Missing virtual driver in Patchbeam

      pirrbe

      PA 2023 22.00.08
      Long time no seeing. So I start up the new year with a first problem : the virtual driver cannot be installed. Reason : it is missing in the Fast Ring PatchBeam Update Service…
      Virtual driver PA 2023-01-28 152607.png
      It seems a standard problem with new releases :-)
      Can I have a link or can it be fixed. Thank you. CU later

      Tech Support
    • How to get a registering code?

      N

      Hi there, been a user since 13 years now and in past whenever I had a problem or question I could email, however since 3 weeks it seems like everybody is dead?

      Anyway, as kind of a last resort, I post this email a 4th time but in this forum instead now, in the hope for help:
      "This is the 3rd time I am emailing you guys as I am missing a working code for the preview of Power Archiver 2023

      Can you please help me? I am a 13 years lasting customer of yours, and I am shocked thatr for whatever reason my support tickets are ignored now, why?

      thanks in advance!
      All the best!
      Joerg"

      Tech Support
    • File Explorer Shell Extension crash on Junction

      W

      Re: Explorer.exe Crash on right click

      This appears to be happening again with the Power Archiver 2022 shell extensions.

      When I have Use Explorer Shell Extensions enabled in Power Archiver Configuration and right-click on c:\Users\username\Start Menu, (hidden Junction file), File Explorer crashes.

      I have version 21.00.15 (03/2022) 64-bit installed in Windows 10 Version 21H2 (Build 19044.1826).

      Tech Support
    • PA 21.00.18 Action / Test behaves oddly for me on .PA files

      Brian Gregory

      PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
      I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
      Discovered:
      a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
      b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files.

      Tech Support
    • PA 21.00.18 testing via context menu causes extraction of files

      D

      When the function for testing archives is invoked via the shell context menu (PowerArchiver > Test) then all the files in the archive get extracted to the current folder.

      The test dialog reports as many errors as there are files in the archive but it fails to give any hint as to which files are supposed to be erroneous or what the nature of the problem might be. Comparing the extracted files to the originals shows no differences at all.

      The .7z in question was produced with maximised compression settings in 7zip (taking forever but resulting in smaller archives than .7z produced by PowerArchiver with maximised settings). Therefore I wanted to see whether PowerArchiver can at least test .7z that it produced itself. Hence I had PowerArchiver convert a .pa with the same contents to .7z. There weren’t any errors reported but the resulting .7z contained fewer than half of the files contained in the .pa (137 of 366), so I scratched that test.

      Performance is abysmal when testing via the context menu (e.g. almost 2 minutes for testing a .7z that 7zip tests in 4 seconds), but that is most likely due to the fact that the extracted files are written to disk. Testing the same .7z in the PowerArchiver GUI takes only 8 seconds but causes the mysterious appearance of a UAC dialog, as reported elsewhere.

      The testing function is vital because PowerArchiver has a history of producing archives that it cannot unpack without errors or that do not conform to the respective file format standards (e.g. ZIP) so that other programs report them as erroneous.

      The point of creating archives is that the files in them will most likely have to be extracted at some point. If the extraction cannot be guaranteed to produce correct results then the whole program is absolutely pointless. Actually, worse than pointless - it causes data loss and hence damage.

      Tech Support

    SOLVED encryption didn't work correctly

    Tech Support
    2
    8
    2171
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      MDuss last edited by

      HI.

      I have here a little problem.
      Actually I have encrypted a small file, 30MB, to an encrypted 7zip Archiv. This works very well.
      But now I wanted to encrypt a big file which is 1.3GB large.
      I use the same options like before for the small file. But I now get a 1KB file. When I try to open it I get only an error massege that powerarchiver 2017 can not open this file. The file seems not to be an valid Archiv.

      But as I said, I use the same Options to create an encrypted file from the big file as I use for the small file.

      With powerarchiver 2016 i haven’t this Problems. When I use an big file like the one from above, all works well.

      So what can i do to make an valid encrypted Archiv with the big file?
      Or I maybe go back to powerarchiver 2016?

      Thanks for your help.
      Michael Duss

      spwolf 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • spwolf
        spwolf conexware @MDuss last edited by

        @mduss This should be fixed in new release:
        https://forums.powerarchiver.com/topic/5848/fast-ring-powerarchiver-2017-17-01-04/7

        Can you let us know if it works fine? In PAES, it will prioritize speed over compression here.

        thank you!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • spwolf
          spwolf conexware @MDuss last edited by spwolf

          @mduss hello, are you using latest PA version? (.92) and what are your OS and your cpu/memory? What are 7z settings?

          Also try using PA format instead of 7z, and let us know if that works. Thanks!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            MDuss last edited by MDuss

            Hi spwolf

            Today I have installed the new Version from PowerArchiver: 17.00.92.
            This Version have the same Problem.
            I use Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit and 32GB RAM with an Intel core i7 5930

            When I wanted to encrypt an Archiv I used the following way:
            I use the kontextmenue in the file Explorer and use encrypt.

            Here I use the following Options:

            target Format: 7-zip

            compression:
            Format: 7-zip
            method: LZMA2
            packing: Ultra
            generate solid Archive: yes

            encryption method: AES - 256 Bit

            This are the Options I use.

            With small files like 50MB there is no Problem.
            But when I wanted to encrypt a large file like an 800MB or several files which have togehter a large file size or so than I will get only a small 1KB file.

            But after some test I think I have found the Problem Kombination:
            When I use the Methode LZMA2 AND one of the following Options for packing: Ultra, Maximum or normal, than I get this error.
            When I use fast or None, than I haven’t this problem.

            So I think there is an error in the packing method Ultra, Maximum and normal with the LZMA2 method

            But my Problem is, that I can not use the new PA format because I load this encrypted file to an webhoster so other Users from my Forum can download them. This archives are Game Mods.

            And not everyone from my Forum use powerarchiver.
            So I use a file format which can open from other archive programs too like 7zip.
            So my favorite target Format is 7-zip. And I use LZMA2 and Ultra because the higher compression rate.

            With powerarchiver 2016 I didn’t have this Problems. With 2016 everything works fine with the same Options I described above.

            So I will use 7-zip, LZMA2 and fast Options at the moment.

            Thanks.
            Michael Duss

            spwolf 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • spwolf
              spwolf conexware @MDuss last edited by

              @mduss lets try this - right click on files in explorer and pick compress with options… now try same combination, does it work? It actually should work, there was some fix implemented in main PA, maybe not in paes.exe.

              Also, for testing purposes, can you use pa/extreme for same file, just so we can see what is the size difference between PA and 7z?

              thanks!

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                MDuss @spwolf last edited by

                @spwolf said in encryption didn't work correctly:

                @mduss lets try this - right click on files in explorer and pick compress with options… now try same combination, does it work? It actually should work, there was some fix implemented in main PA, maybe not in paes.exe.

                Also, for testing purposes, can you use pa/extreme for same file, just so we can see what is the size difference between PA and 7z?

                thanks!

                Hi spwolf.

                The method with “compress with options” works very well. Here I have no problems.
                So the Problem seems to be the paes.exe.

                The differences between pa/extrem and 7-zip LZMA2/Ultra are very small.
                Depending on the used files the differences are 1 till 2 MB.
                Here the Files had a complete size from 323MB and they were multiple files with difference file Format like .exe, .pdf and so on. The pa file was 2 till 3 MB smaller.

                With an other file I had a difference from 8MB. This was an single .zip archiv with 810MB witch I have encrypted with the Explorer Kontext “compress to…”
                The filesize was 810MB. And here the pa file was 8MB smaller.

                So I think the paes.exe needs an fix.

                By the way.
                Do you have any Infos regarding this Problem?
                https://forums.powerarchiver.com/topic/5814/powerarchiver-outlook-plug-in-don-t-works-correctly/3

                Thanks very much.
                Michael Duss

                spwolf 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • spwolf
                  spwolf conexware @MDuss last edited by

                  @mduss not yet for PAOP, we will update bug when fixed. Thanks for the rest of it, entered it for one of the next release.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • spwolf
                    spwolf conexware @MDuss last edited by

                    @mduss This should be fixed in new release:
                    https://forums.powerarchiver.com/topic/5848/fast-ring-powerarchiver-2017-17-01-04/7

                    Can you let us know if it works fine? In PAES, it will prioritize speed over compression here.

                    thank you!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      MDuss last edited by

                      Hi spwolf.

                      I have tested it today and it work now correctly.
                      So the problem is solved for me. :-)

                      Thx.
                      MfG
                      MDuss

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • First post
                        Last post