Hi everyone, some good news about PowerArchiver… I’ve managed to get in touch with the original developer of PowerArchiver, Ivan Petrovic, and he has confirmed that the product is not dead or abandoned, in fact it is still very much alive! There has been a hiatus over the past months for various reasons, but that we should expect to see stuff coming through in the coming months (hopefully the next 2 months).
I had a large .tar file (a backed up WSL) and I want to delete a few directories and their contents from it using PA2023.
PA just destroys the whole archive as soon as I try to delete a directory, leaving it in a state where PA2023 won’t even open it any more.
I tried several times and also tried compressing it to .tar.xz instead - same result.
This should either actually work, or it should say operation not supported and do nothing.
Hello!
The regular version of PA 2023 is out for over 6 months now, but there is still no sign of the portable release.
(When) will there be one?
Thanks!
Hello!
Is there currently no portable version of PA2023 available?
(When) do you plan to release one?
Thanks!
Win 11 64 bit
I have some archives which have been encrypted, using the encrypt option either in pbs or when interactively creating a zip. When I open these, and look at files, I am asked for passwords, which I know, and then can view items or decrypt the files in the archive (tools>decrypt files).
However, when I use the Actions>Remove Archive Encryption (whether using the same zip or asking to write another), the routine shows progress bar to the end, but then just hangs i.e. “OK” never activates. All process information shows this stalled/hanging.
What can I do to sort this out?
For example:
Download this ZIP file: http://dslstats.me.uk/files/dslstats32W-6.5.zip
Everything in the ZIP file is in a directory “dslstats32W-6.5”.
However when I extract using right click “Extract Here” the name of the directory created is “2W-6.5” !
I am running PA 22.00.09 on Windows 11. I have seen the same happen with some other kinds of archive too.
If I compress a folder to a .pa using right click, Compress to folder.pa and use the new Windows 11 menu then the Options, Configuration, Miscellaneous, Use normal relative path setting is always enabled.
But I like this option disabled so I have to use the old style menu in order to get PA to compress a folder in the way I wish.
Just tried using the Modern (Windows 10) Icon set and seeing a few missing icons in both PowerArchiver Burner and PowerArchiver Encryption screens . They are all there in the Minimalistik icon set and the only difference I can see is the former is blue and the latter grey. In version 22.00.9
powerarc_2023-09-18_17-00-19.png
powerarc_2023-09-18_17-01-05.png
PA 22.00.09
344c6c52-f03f-407b-ad76-8130b31936bb-image.png
PA 22.00.09 shows a nag screen, when I try to open some setting windows. I have already PA 2023 Toolbox and PA shows, that it’s licensed in the info dialog.
a860bd81-3e71-4ce0-9988-74cd4189d43e-image.png
0836bc83-8046-4a91-bc7b-68bd231100a3-image.png
PA 22.00.09
Some labels in the help toolbar are not translated:
b3c1f5c4-b73d-49d8-9ed0-56294840838c-image.png
I’m looking forward to deploying PowerArchiver 2023 to my users. Can you tell us when the MSI will be available for download and distribution?
Thanks.
Hi there,
there were some security issues fixed in 7zip:
https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1165/
https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1164/
As it seems, that PowerArchiver and PACL use the 7zip libraries, could you please update them to the latest version?
Hi,
From where I get PAVD2023.EXE? PowerArchiver 2023 tries to open it.
But it seems, it tries to download PAVD2021.EXE.
Thanks
I noticed that the version of ZPAQ used is older than the latest released 7.15 https://mattmahoney.net/dc/zpaq.html also there seems to be a newer fork that adds several features https://github.com/fcorbelli/zpaqfranz
It would be useful to implement this latest version (it also maintains the same syntax and behavior as the latest official release if used the -715 flag) and add when opening a zpaq file a choice of the version of the files to show (e.g. as dummy folders represented the various versions present). Since any previous changes are stored with this format, it is possible to extract a snapshot of a certain date/version.
Powerarchiver-profiles
-
I am not sure if it is there already (vainly searched for it), but what about:
adding a feature to create specific profiles and add that to the context menu.
for example:
I would create a profile that would:
a. zip a file
b. when doing so, ask for a password
c. define that once the file is being extracted and the pw has been entered
the file should be extracted into a folder named after the filename
(similar to extract to, but when the file is being double-clicked and the pw is entered, it will extract to a folder named after the filenameI would create that does spanning automatically
etc.
Just an idea
-
you can already adjust default shell profiles, did you check that out?
-
Hi,
Here’s a screenshot of the profiles screen where you can configure the options.
You can adjust the selected default Zip profile and configure it with the options you mentioned.In terms of extraction, you can always use the Right Click>Extract to Subfolder option and the archive will be extracted into a folder with the same name as the file.
Hope that helps!
-
will there ever be an option to add newly created profiles to context menu ?
-
will there ever be an option to add newly created profiles to context menu ?
Sounds like a feature request :)
Putting it in! -
I was sure I mentioned it many moons ago but I won’t swear to it…:D
But I’ve often thought of how useful it would be to many users out there
that like to create or tweak an existing profile and then have it in their context menu.
I for one would certainly use it on a daily basis.consider it a request then ‘Mili’…:D
Apologies to ‘wulffra’ for ‘Hijacking’ his thread…:(
-
profiles work already in compress+options window in shell extensions.
How should/would they look like in shell directly?
-
for me . . . it would be that being able to select a custom profile directly from the shell would be nice. Short of that, it would be nice if the system would remember the profile the user standardly employs with a format.
Again, this is not a huge time savings. And if it is very difficult to implement, so be it.
But the first would save three steps; the second, two.
Some of this could be implemented indirectly by allowing copy or move via drag and drop (just as one can copy or move in Explorer, depending on whether one is holding down the Ctrl or Shft key).
-
for me . . . it would be that being able to select a custom profile directly from the shell would be nice
couldn’t agree more…I’ve always wanted the option…:)
-
couldn’t agree more…I’ve always wanted the option…:)
how would this look/work? Explain it guys :-)
-
There are several options that come to mind. Perhaps the first is the simplest.
In the left column of the available shell extensions include five options for custom profiles. The user then clicks and selects her favorite profile(s) and moves them to the right column, either in the main or sub-menu.
Or you could give the user the ability to define what ZIP means (which profile it uses by default).
In the compression profiles (configuration options), some are listed as ShellEx: _____ and some custom ones do not have the prefix (I tried adding it once, but it did not work, as I recall). So if you have an option to let us add the prefix – or tell us how to add ShellEx options to the registry – we would have what we want.
-
ShellEx ones are the ones that are default for those formats in shell… so if you change ShellEx one for ZIP, that is going to be the setting for Compress to zip.
-
Actually, I was thinking I couldn’t edit those, but I must be misremembering.
I want the ability to select and edit the ShellEx’s so it will include my default 3-4 profiles.
It would also help it the add window remembered not only the format last used, but also the profile last used.
-
Are there still plans for this to go ahead in the near future ?
-
will there ever be an option to add newly created profiles to context menu ?
can you explain this moles? thanks!
-
I believe this is Moles’ request:
Users can now create their own profiles. Very helpful.
Those of us who do this, use those profiles more often than we use the default profiles for different formats.
It would be nice to have the option to add our profiles to the context menu options. Then, rather than having to choose “compress to” and then select the preferred format and profile, we could choose to compress to “MolesZIPX” profile.
That is what I have wanted; I think Moles does too.
Hope I haven’t misspoke for you, Moles.
-
you mean for compress to .zip for instance? Where there are no options to select? Or?
-
Compress to XXXX, where X is a profile, created by the user (new profile), that includes some specified format and any particular settings the user may deem desirable.
Is that what you want Moles?
-
Exactly !
Thanks ‘Socrates’ :) -
Whew. I thought we were on the same page. But I didn’t want to speak out of turn.
I know users have some ability to change existing shell profiles. I would like more. I have have three zip profiles and three 7z profiles. I would like to choose which ones appear as shell options.
Is that doable without too much hassle?
-
it’s an option I’ve always hoped they’s implement…
thanks for the confirmation buddy…:) -
so option in profiles:
x Add to shell extension: Main / Sub
Compress to file.zip
Compress to file.zip (Profile Name)
Compress to file.zipx
Compress to file.7z?
-
yep!
Perfect :) -
expected in the foreseeable future ?
-
whats foreseeable?
-
I meant is it forthcoming anytime soon ?
is it ‘penned’ in for a future release ? -
yes, we will try to make it work, but it has to be major release, not these small maintenance update…