-
在当今的数字时代,通信变得更加快捷和高效,教育领域也不例外。 罗切斯特高中是学校采用技术来加强学生、教师和家长之间沟通的典型例子。 他们使用的最重要的工具之一是学校电子邮件系统,该系统在多个方面都大[有裨益。
首先,罗彻斯特高中的电子邮件系统允许学生和教师之间进行及时有效的沟通。 过去,学生必须依靠面对面的会议或电话与老师 沟通,这可能很耗时,而且常 工作职能邮件数据库 常导致错过消息或误解。 然而,通过学校的电子邮件系统,学生可以快速地向他们的老师发送电子邮件并得到及时的回复。 这不仅可以节省时间,还可以进行清晰简洁的交流,这对于学业成功至关重要。
a320f9d3-78c0-4c6a-b75f-8d0e1d4691cc-image.png
其次,电子邮件系统使教师能够向学生和家长发送重要更新。 罗切斯特高中每周向家长发送时事通讯,告知他们学校活动、学业进展和其他重要信息。 这有助于家长及时了解孩子的教育情况,并让他们更多地参与孩子的学业之旅。 此外,教师可以使用电子邮件系统向学生发送有关即将到来的作业、测试或活动的提醒。 这对于可能难以记住截止日期或在校外有多项承诺的学生特别有用。
-
PA2023 Win10, (same problem with older releases but never reported)
PA Soft is installed on partition D. (exclusive for installed progs)
Then I created on my partition G: the folders as configured in PA Settings ‘Folders’.0fcf1b09-1b91-4b74-b250-f8cf908a3348-Ashampoo_Snap_maandag 20 maart 2023_11h54m34s.png
Screenshot 2023-03-20 121152.png
The problem : Any activity on PA is saved in these folders…
PA ignores them and still use the default settings. Whats wrong ? Regards, Pirrbe -
I am still using Powerarchiver 2022 and it does not show pdf markups in the preview. Is there a setting to get version 2022 to show pdf markups in the preview? If not, does this work in version 2023?
-
The question that I have about PA archives is what happens if say ConeXware, as a company, dies in the future? What happens to any PA files that are created today? Can these files be decompressed with a copy of a PowerArchiver that can no longer phone home to the mothership thus can’t be registered or activated?
I mean, I can understand that new PA files wouldn’t be able to be created if the program isn’t registered but what about an un-registered copy because well, the question that I posed above?
It’s questions like this that make me not want to store anything really valuable in PA files out of fear that I, at some point in the future, might lose access to said data inside those files. OK, 7ZIP might not be able to compress as heavily as PA but at least it’s open source and any 7ZIP files will still be able to be read and decompressed ten, twenty, or fifty years from now.
-
For some reason, the PowerArchiver functions in the Windows 11 context menu no longer work after the last Windows Update. Only the functions in the classic context menu function as they should.
I’ve tried uninstalling PowerArchiver and using RevoUninstaller to remove all bits and pieces that were left behind and did a clean install of PowerArchiver, it didn’t fix the issue. Other items in the Windows 11 context menu work.
-
Is this a known problem? Is there a fix coming? This is a primary reason I buy PA.
I’ve tried both methods I know to extract multiple zips at the same time. 1) Multi Extract feature in the GUI. 2) In Windows File Explorer, select multiple zips, right click, use PA context menu to Extract or Extract To…
Is there a setting I missed? Or maybe it really is processing in parallel, but I can’t detect it? Nothing tells me in the Processes in Task Manager that multiple PA extracts are running. And my CPU, memory and disk resources do not look like a lot of extracts are running.
I’m using PA 2022 Standard version 21.00.18 on Windows 11 Pro version 10.0.22621 Build 22621.
-
In the latest version of PA, on W11 (latest build/SP) when you try to use the first level context menu - NOTHING HAPPENS (particularly when you do this from Downloads or Documents folders) - however I noticed that it DOES WORK when you use the context menu from the Desktop. Going to the second level context menu does work however.
-
-
PA 2023 22.00.08
Long time no seeing. So I start up the new year with a first problem : the virtual driver cannot be installed. Reason : it is missing in the Fast Ring PatchBeam Update Service…
Virtual driver PA 2023-01-28 152607.png
It seems a standard problem with new releases :-)
Can I have a link or can it be fixed. Thank you. CU later -
Hi there, been a user since 13 years now and in past whenever I had a problem or question I could email, however since 3 weeks it seems like everybody is dead?
Anyway, as kind of a last resort, I post this email a 4th time but in this forum instead now, in the hope for help:
"This is the 3rd time I am emailing you guys as I am missing a working code for the preview of Power Archiver 2023Can you please help me? I am a 13 years lasting customer of yours, and I am shocked thatr for whatever reason my support tickets are ignored now, why?
thanks in advance!
All the best!
Joerg" -
Re: Explorer.exe Crash on right click
This appears to be happening again with the Power Archiver 2022 shell extensions.
When I have Use Explorer Shell Extensions enabled in Power Archiver Configuration and right-click on c:\Users\username\Start Menu, (hidden Junction file), File Explorer crashes.
I have version 21.00.15 (03/2022) 64-bit installed in Windows 10 Version 21H2 (Build 19044.1826).
-
-
When the function for testing archives is invoked via the shell context menu (PowerArchiver > Test) then all the files in the archive get extracted to the current folder.
The test dialog reports as many errors as there are files in the archive but it fails to give any hint as to which files are supposed to be erroneous or what the nature of the problem might be. Comparing the extracted files to the originals shows no differences at all.
The .7z in question was produced with maximised compression settings in 7zip (taking forever but resulting in smaller archives than .7z produced by PowerArchiver with maximised settings). Therefore I wanted to see whether PowerArchiver can at least test .7z that it produced itself. Hence I had PowerArchiver convert a .pa with the same contents to .7z. There weren’t any errors reported but the resulting .7z contained fewer than half of the files contained in the .pa (137 of 366), so I scratched that test.
Performance is abysmal when testing via the context menu (e.g. almost 2 minutes for testing a .7z that 7zip tests in 4 seconds), but that is most likely due to the fact that the extracted files are written to disk. Testing the same .7z in the PowerArchiver GUI takes only 8 seconds but causes the mysterious appearance of a UAC dialog, as reported elsewhere.
The testing function is vital because PowerArchiver has a history of producing archives that it cannot unpack without errors or that do not conform to the respective file format standards (e.g. ZIP) so that other programs report them as erroneous.
The point of creating archives is that the files in them will most likely have to be extracted at some point. If the extraction cannot be guaranteed to produce correct results then the whole program is absolutely pointless. Actually, worse than pointless - it causes data loss and hence damage.
Powerarchiver-profiles
-
I am not sure if it is there already (vainly searched for it), but what about:
adding a feature to create specific profiles and add that to the context menu.
for example:
I would create a profile that would:
a. zip a file
b. when doing so, ask for a password
c. define that once the file is being extracted and the pw has been entered
the file should be extracted into a folder named after the filename
(similar to extract to, but when the file is being double-clicked and the pw is entered, it will extract to a folder named after the filenameI would create that does spanning automatically
etc.
Just an idea
-
you can already adjust default shell profiles, did you check that out?
-
Hi,
Here’s a screenshot of the profiles screen where you can configure the options.
You can adjust the selected default Zip profile and configure it with the options you mentioned.In terms of extraction, you can always use the Right Click>Extract to Subfolder option and the archive will be extracted into a folder with the same name as the file.
Hope that helps!
-
will there ever be an option to add newly created profiles to context menu ?
-
will there ever be an option to add newly created profiles to context menu ?
Sounds like a feature request :)
Putting it in! -
I was sure I mentioned it many moons ago but I won’t swear to it…:D
But I’ve often thought of how useful it would be to many users out there
that like to create or tweak an existing profile and then have it in their context menu.
I for one would certainly use it on a daily basis.consider it a request then ‘Mili’…:D
Apologies to ‘wulffra’ for ‘Hijacking’ his thread…:(
-
profiles work already in compress+options window in shell extensions.
How should/would they look like in shell directly?
-
for me . . . it would be that being able to select a custom profile directly from the shell would be nice. Short of that, it would be nice if the system would remember the profile the user standardly employs with a format.
Again, this is not a huge time savings. And if it is very difficult to implement, so be it.
But the first would save three steps; the second, two.
Some of this could be implemented indirectly by allowing copy or move via drag and drop (just as one can copy or move in Explorer, depending on whether one is holding down the Ctrl or Shft key).
-
for me . . . it would be that being able to select a custom profile directly from the shell would be nice
couldn’t agree more…I’ve always wanted the option…:)
-
couldn’t agree more…I’ve always wanted the option…:)
how would this look/work? Explain it guys :-)
-
There are several options that come to mind. Perhaps the first is the simplest.
In the left column of the available shell extensions include five options for custom profiles. The user then clicks and selects her favorite profile(s) and moves them to the right column, either in the main or sub-menu.
Or you could give the user the ability to define what ZIP means (which profile it uses by default).
In the compression profiles (configuration options), some are listed as ShellEx: _____ and some custom ones do not have the prefix (I tried adding it once, but it did not work, as I recall). So if you have an option to let us add the prefix – or tell us how to add ShellEx options to the registry – we would have what we want.
-
ShellEx ones are the ones that are default for those formats in shell… so if you change ShellEx one for ZIP, that is going to be the setting for Compress to zip.
-
Actually, I was thinking I couldn’t edit those, but I must be misremembering.
I want the ability to select and edit the ShellEx’s so it will include my default 3-4 profiles.
It would also help it the add window remembered not only the format last used, but also the profile last used.
-
Are there still plans for this to go ahead in the near future ?
-
will there ever be an option to add newly created profiles to context menu ?
can you explain this moles? thanks!
-
I believe this is Moles’ request:
Users can now create their own profiles. Very helpful.
Those of us who do this, use those profiles more often than we use the default profiles for different formats.
It would be nice to have the option to add our profiles to the context menu options. Then, rather than having to choose “compress to” and then select the preferred format and profile, we could choose to compress to “MolesZIPX” profile.
That is what I have wanted; I think Moles does too.
Hope I haven’t misspoke for you, Moles.
-
you mean for compress to .zip for instance? Where there are no options to select? Or?
-
Compress to XXXX, where X is a profile, created by the user (new profile), that includes some specified format and any particular settings the user may deem desirable.
Is that what you want Moles?
-
Exactly !
Thanks ‘Socrates’ :) -
Whew. I thought we were on the same page. But I didn’t want to speak out of turn.
I know users have some ability to change existing shell profiles. I would like more. I have have three zip profiles and three 7z profiles. I would like to choose which ones appear as shell options.
Is that doable without too much hassle?
-
it’s an option I’ve always hoped they’s implement…
thanks for the confirmation buddy…:) -
so option in profiles:
x Add to shell extension: Main / Sub
Compress to file.zip
Compress to file.zip (Profile Name)
Compress to file.zipx
Compress to file.7z?
-
yep!
Perfect :) -
expected in the foreseeable future ?
-
whats foreseeable?
-
I meant is it forthcoming anytime soon ?
is it ‘penned’ in for a future release ? -
yes, we will try to make it work, but it has to be major release, not these small maintenance update…