Navigation

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Missing virtual driver in Patchbeam

      pirrbe

      PA 2023 22.00.08
      Long time no seeing. So I start up the new year with a first problem : the virtual driver cannot be installed. Reason : it is missing in the Fast Ring PatchBeam Update Service…
      Virtual driver PA 2023-01-28 152607.png
      It seems a standard problem with new releases :-)
      Can I have a link or can it be fixed. Thank you. CU later

      Tech Support
    • PA 21.00.18 testing via context menu causes extraction of files

      D

      When the function for testing archives is invoked via the shell context menu (PowerArchiver > Test) then all the files in the archive get extracted to the current folder.

      The test dialog reports as many errors as there are files in the archive but it fails to give any hint as to which files are supposed to be erroneous or what the nature of the problem might be. Comparing the extracted files to the originals shows no differences at all.

      The .7z in question was produced with maximised compression settings in 7zip (taking forever but resulting in smaller archives than .7z produced by PowerArchiver with maximised settings). Therefore I wanted to see whether PowerArchiver can at least test .7z that it produced itself. Hence I had PowerArchiver convert a .pa with the same contents to .7z. There weren’t any errors reported but the resulting .7z contained fewer than half of the files contained in the .pa (137 of 366), so I scratched that test.

      Performance is abysmal when testing via the context menu (e.g. almost 2 minutes for testing a .7z that 7zip tests in 4 seconds), but that is most likely due to the fact that the extracted files are written to disk. Testing the same .7z in the PowerArchiver GUI takes only 8 seconds but causes the mysterious appearance of a UAC dialog, as reported elsewhere.

      The testing function is vital because PowerArchiver has a history of producing archives that it cannot unpack without errors or that do not conform to the respective file format standards (e.g. ZIP) so that other programs report them as erroneous.

      The point of creating archives is that the files in them will most likely have to be extracted at some point. If the extraction cannot be guaranteed to produce correct results then the whole program is absolutely pointless. Actually, worse than pointless - it causes data loss and hence damage.

      Tech Support
    • Start PowerArchiver 2023 Starter when my computer starts

      Brian Gregory

      In PowerArchiver 2023 22.00.06 configuration, the option labelled “Start PowerArchiver 2023 Starter when my computer starts” seems to be redundant.

      I am only allowed to change this option when PA Starter is disabled, and then it seems to be ignored.

      When I enable PA Starter this option is forced to the enabled state.

      I think it’d be good to remove “Start PowerArchiver 2023 Starter when my computer starts” completely. I’ve always found it confusing having both options.

      Added later: However i don’t particularly want to use queue but I do like having the PAStarter icon in my tray area.

      Tech Support
    • Testing .pa archives

      PA_Fan

      W10 Pro 22H2 - 64 -bit

      PA 22.00.06 (PA 2023)

      It has been the case with previous versions of PowerArchiver, but I had hoped that the latest might behave differently. Not so, I’m afraid.

      I have, for various obscure reasons, created a few .pa archives, mainly in the hope that they will save me some more space. From time to time, I use the “Test” option to check that important archives are OK and uncorrupted.

      With every .pa archive I’ve tested, the process runs through OK but then reports that there are errors. This is always the number of files in the archive e.g. if 11 files, then 11 errors reported.

      In the .pa, I can:-

      preview the files (usually PDF) extract some or all files and look at or use them convert the .pa to a .zip or .zipx archive, which then works fine and tests without errors

      Is it the case that the Test routine isn’t designed for .pa archives, or is there another reason? Although the .pa seems to function properly, despite the test reporting errors, I would like to be sure that every .pa is OK and not “broken”.

      Some of the .pas are quite old and produced with earlier PA versions (they are truly “archives”). If I extract all the files in the old .pa, create a new, fresh .pa and add back the files to that, then test the new, no errors (at least in the .pa I’ve tried this on) are reported. This would suggest a mismatch between old .pas and newer versions of PA itself.

      Tech Support
    • PA 21.00.18 Action / Test behaves oddly for me on .PA files

      Brian Gregory

      PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
      I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
      Discovered:
      a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
      b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files.

      Tech Support
    • Small UI / Theme bug in 2023

      Z

      Clipboard02.jpg

      See the, supposedly, blank space where the green box is? It’s like that in Modern Light theme too. I can toggle it, but it’s missing text or shouldn’t be there I guess?

      Thanks :)

      Tech Support
    • PowerArchiver and PACL for macOS

      spwolf

      Dear @Alpha-Testers and all of our users,

      time has come for testing of PowerArchiver and PACL for macOS.
      Please let us know here if you have Mac and can test latest builds.

      Features implemented:
      PowerArchiver 2020 - tabbing, opening, extracting, adding, testing, favorite folders, support for multiple languages, opening via Finder, explorer mode, installer.
      PACL 10 - support for most formats and features in Windows version.

      Upcoming: Tools such as archive converter, batch zip, multi-extract.

      To start testing, please sign up here in this thread, and we will send you latest build.

      thank you!

      Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h54m56s_008_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m05s_009_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m14s_010_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m30s_011_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m39s_012_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m49s_013_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h56m00s_014_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h54m43s_007_.png

      76e97ab9-8d75-4175-9ce8-446500031f38-image.png

      Tech Support
    • Functions in Windows 11 context menu no longer work after last Windows Update

      T

      For some reason, the PowerArchiver functions in the Windows 11 context menu no longer work after the last Windows Update. Only the functions in the classic context menu function as they should.

      I’ve tried uninstalling PowerArchiver and using RevoUninstaller to remove all bits and pieces that were left behind and did a clean install of PowerArchiver, it didn’t fix the issue. Other items in the Windows 11 context menu work.

      Tech Support

    Start up time before unzipping is slow!

    Tech Support
    4
    17
    6585
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      gate1975mlm last edited by

      Is there anyway you guys could speed up the time for when opening archives?

      I am not talking about the unzipping part but the time it takes to start the unzipping after I click Extract Here button.

      I just wish it was faster. I see the slow speed the most on bigger files.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        Mili conexware last edited by

        Which version are you using? How large is the file you are opening?
        How are you opening the file?

        Thanks!

        G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • spwolf
          spwolf conexware last edited by

          is it slower on big files, faster on small files?

          G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G
            gate1975mlm @Mili last edited by

            @Mili:

            Which version are you using? How large is the file you are opening?
            How are you opening the file?

            Thanks!

            I am running the latest build 11.61.07

            As far as the files all sizes but it seems the slowest on really big ones like files over 1GB.

            spwolf 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • moles42
              moles42 Alpha Testers last edited by

              curious to know what your hardware is also.

              Windows 10 Pro x64
              Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz
              4.00GB Dual-Channel DDR2 @ 399MHz
              NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

              G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G
                gate1975mlm @spwolf last edited by

                @spwolf:

                is it slower on big files, faster on small files?

                Yes

                G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • spwolf
                  spwolf conexware @gate1975mlm last edited by

                  @gate1975mlm:

                  I am running the latest build 11.61.07

                  As far as the files all sizes but it seems the slowest on really big ones like files over 1GB.

                  basically it is part of extraction process (it scans through the archive), it is just that progress does not start before it, so it looks like PA is doing nothing, rest assured that is.

                  I am talking about the difference between extracting 1 file in archive and 100,000 files in archive. Before that is PA startup time which we are always working on optimizing a bit.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • spwolf
                    spwolf conexware @gate1975mlm last edited by

                    it also very much depends on the format…

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      gate1975mlm @gate1975mlm last edited by

                      WinRAR for exampe is much faster starting the unpacking of really big files.

                      Is kind of hard to explain.

                      What I mean is when i upack a big file with WinRAR the WinRAR interface displays almost instant and starts unpacking. Where as PowerArchive’s interface is slower at opening and kind looks like its frozen for a second and then starts to unpack.

                      You understand what i mean?

                      I guess you could say WinRAR seem smoother :)

                      spwolf 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G
                        gate1975mlm @moles42 last edited by

                        @moles42:

                        curious to know what your hardware is also.

                        Intel Core2 Duo 6700
                        4GB Ram
                        Tons of hard drive space
                        Windows 7 64 Bit

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • spwolf
                          spwolf conexware @gate1975mlm last edited by

                          @gate1975mlm:

                          WinRAR for exampe is much faster starting the unpacking of really big files.

                          Is kind of hard to explain.

                          What I mean is when i upack a big file with WinRAR the WinRAR interface displays almost instant and starts unpacking. Where as PowerArchive’s interface is slower at opening and kind looks like its frozen for a second and then starts to unpack.

                          You understand what i mean?

                          I guess you could say WinRAR seem smoother :)

                          Yes, i understand exactly… When it comes to actual speed (not perception), it depends on what format you use. Starting to extract 100,000 files in rar archive is a lot slower than in zip, because unrar.dll is slower to list those files.

                          But what you are reffering is perception probably, as PA progress shows only after pa engine goes through the archive, so it looks like it is stalling for 0.5-1s, but it is actually working.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • moles42
                            moles42 Alpha Testers last edited by

                            similar system to mine…I just tested an archive (zip) with just over 15,000 files and it started to extract after about 2 seconds.
                            I assume yours is taking much longer?

                            Windows 10 Pro x64
                            Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz
                            4.00GB Dual-Channel DDR2 @ 399MHz
                            NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

                            spwolf 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • spwolf
                              spwolf conexware @gate1975mlm last edited by

                              and also PA is 0.1-0.4s slower to start by itself, we constantly work on shaving 100ms’s from that time ;-).

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • spwolf
                                spwolf conexware @moles42 last edited by

                                @moles42:

                                similar system to mine…I just tested an archive (zip) with just over 15,000 files and it started to extract after about 2 seconds.
                                I assume yours is taking much longer?

                                i think he is reffering to first 1 second of the process… Its basically cosmetical as it gives perception that PA is not doing anything for a second or so (depending on archive and other things).

                                G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • moles42
                                  moles42 Alpha Testers last edited by

                                  yes it does give that appearance as though doing nothing but I always knew it was working ‘behind the scenes’ before dealing with the task at hand…:)

                                  Windows 10 Pro x64
                                  Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz
                                  4.00GB Dual-Channel DDR2 @ 399MHz
                                  NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • G
                                    gate1975mlm @spwolf last edited by

                                    @spwolf:

                                    i think he is reffering to first 1 second of the process… Its basically cosmetical as it gives perception that PA is not doing anything for a second or so (depending on archive and other things).

                                    Exactly :)

                                    I wish there was a way you could some how make it so the PowerArchiver UI starts up almost instantly and then starts the unpacking.

                                    Maybe you could do something like this for example.

                                    Have the PowerArchiver UI open right away and then on the UI have a count down like “starting in 3,2,1”

                                    I think that would look a lot nicer then the way it is now which looks like the ui is freezing.

                                    Its just an idea :)

                                    Anyway thanks for your help and info guys :)

                                    spwolf 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • spwolf
                                      spwolf conexware @gate1975mlm last edited by

                                      @gate1975mlm:

                                      Exactly :)

                                      I wish there was a way you could some how make it so the PowerArchiver UI starts up almost instantly and then starts the unpacking.

                                      Maybe you could do something like this for example.

                                      Have the PowerArchiver UI open right away and then on the UI have a count down like “starting in 3,2,1”

                                      I think that would look a lot nicer then the way it is now which looks like the ui is freezing.

                                      Its just an idea :)

                                      Anyway thanks for your help and info guys :)

                                      it is something that annoys me personally as well, so we are always working on improving it ;-). Just be assured that PA is actually working during that time.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • First post
                                        Last post