Hi everyone, some good news about PowerArchiver… I’ve managed to get in touch with the original developer of PowerArchiver, Ivan Petrovic, and he has confirmed that the product is not dead or abandoned, in fact it is still very much alive! There has been a hiatus over the past months for various reasons, but that we should expect to see stuff coming through in the coming months (hopefully the next 2 months).
I had a large .tar file (a backed up WSL) and I want to delete a few directories and their contents from it using PA2023.
PA just destroys the whole archive as soon as I try to delete a directory, leaving it in a state where PA2023 won’t even open it any more.
I tried several times and also tried compressing it to .tar.xz instead - same result.
This should either actually work, or it should say operation not supported and do nothing.
Hello!
The regular version of PA 2023 is out for over 6 months now, but there is still no sign of the portable release.
(When) will there be one?
Thanks!
Hello!
Is there currently no portable version of PA2023 available?
(When) do you plan to release one?
Thanks!
Win 11 64 bit
I have some archives which have been encrypted, using the encrypt option either in pbs or when interactively creating a zip. When I open these, and look at files, I am asked for passwords, which I know, and then can view items or decrypt the files in the archive (tools>decrypt files).
However, when I use the Actions>Remove Archive Encryption (whether using the same zip or asking to write another), the routine shows progress bar to the end, but then just hangs i.e. “OK” never activates. All process information shows this stalled/hanging.
What can I do to sort this out?
For example:
Download this ZIP file: http://dslstats.me.uk/files/dslstats32W-6.5.zip
Everything in the ZIP file is in a directory “dslstats32W-6.5”.
However when I extract using right click “Extract Here” the name of the directory created is “2W-6.5” !
I am running PA 22.00.09 on Windows 11. I have seen the same happen with some other kinds of archive too.
If I compress a folder to a .pa using right click, Compress to folder.pa and use the new Windows 11 menu then the Options, Configuration, Miscellaneous, Use normal relative path setting is always enabled.
But I like this option disabled so I have to use the old style menu in order to get PA to compress a folder in the way I wish.
Just tried using the Modern (Windows 10) Icon set and seeing a few missing icons in both PowerArchiver Burner and PowerArchiver Encryption screens . They are all there in the Minimalistik icon set and the only difference I can see is the former is blue and the latter grey. In version 22.00.9
powerarc_2023-09-18_17-00-19.png
powerarc_2023-09-18_17-01-05.png
PA 22.00.09
344c6c52-f03f-407b-ad76-8130b31936bb-image.png
PA 22.00.09 shows a nag screen, when I try to open some setting windows. I have already PA 2023 Toolbox and PA shows, that it’s licensed in the info dialog.
a860bd81-3e71-4ce0-9988-74cd4189d43e-image.png
0836bc83-8046-4a91-bc7b-68bd231100a3-image.png
PA 22.00.09
Some labels in the help toolbar are not translated:
b3c1f5c4-b73d-49d8-9ed0-56294840838c-image.png
I’m looking forward to deploying PowerArchiver 2023 to my users. Can you tell us when the MSI will be available for download and distribution?
Thanks.
Hi there,
there were some security issues fixed in 7zip:
https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1165/
https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1164/
As it seems, that PowerArchiver and PACL use the 7zip libraries, could you please update them to the latest version?
Hi,
From where I get PAVD2023.EXE? PowerArchiver 2023 tries to open it.
But it seems, it tries to download PAVD2021.EXE.
Thanks
I noticed that the version of ZPAQ used is older than the latest released 7.15 https://mattmahoney.net/dc/zpaq.html also there seems to be a newer fork that adds several features https://github.com/fcorbelli/zpaqfranz
It would be useful to implement this latest version (it also maintains the same syntax and behavior as the latest official release if used the -715 flag) and add when opening a zpaq file a choice of the version of the files to show (e.g. as dummy folders represented the various versions present). Since any previous changes are stored with this format, it is possible to extract a snapshot of a certain date/version.
PA 2010 Beta
-
I like this very much!
-
same here!…enjoying it now.
-
Does one uninstall 2009 first or install over the top.
Cheers
DrT
-
I downloaded it and installed over 2009, thus retaining my preferences etc.
But that’s because I trust the PA guys!
I think that you should be able to install to a different folder and thus run both versions. I haven’t myself done this with PA, and I would suggest that you seek guidance in the Tech forum if you feel you want to keep both.
-
you can simply install it over PA 2009 and it will work great, even registration will work :-).
-
@PABlog:
PowerArchiver 2009 Beta 1 Preview is out - Pro users Exclusive!
Either it is “old news” or some editing is required :p
-
:-)
-
The new version is nice indeed. There is a small problem with the licence system: after installing it over 2009 version, uninstalling and reinstalling it as a fresh program the trial popup appeared saying that the program had expired. It didn’t accept my licence initially (!), only after running the program in trial mode for a couple of times. Strange. My OS is Win 7 x64 build 7000.
2 requests:
- a native x64 version :)
- make that white background dissapear; it’s sooo ugly
-
indeed it took me several attempts before it would accept my registration details…:(
strange I don’t get the white background in vista.
-
My OS is Win 7 not Vista. :)
-
i think it might due to different 64bit shell extensions… thats good thing to check here.
-
p.s. no 64bit version - there is not need for it as there would be no gains whatsoever in any aspect of PA.
-
no 64bit version - there is not need for it as there would be no gains whatsoever in any aspect of PA.
Not even with 7-zip compression and large dictionaries? I’d expect that it could take advantage of extra RAM.
What about at least compiling large address aware? That way the x64 users could at least use 4 GB of RAM.
-
Not even with 7-zip compression and large dictionaries? I’d expect that it could take advantage of extra RAM.
What about at least compiling large address aware? That way the x64 users could at least use 4 GB of RAM.
nope… ultra mode of 7z uses 750 MB of ram all together… and block sizes dont have anything to do with ram usage (so you can have 16 GB solid block for instance).
-
On the context menu icon, I thought I would mention this topic: http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2948
Possibly related since Frank is running x64?
-
Although this is not a thread for reporting bug, we did some fixed for next and hopefully transparency problem will be solved. I tested with XP x64 and Vista x64 with no problems so far.
-
i am closing this thread, if you have bug to report, please report it in its own thread and in tech support forums.
-
thanks
