• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Updates
    D

    Any updates going to happen for the bugs reported?

    Tech Support
    Bug extracting from ZIP etc using Extract here with PA 22.00.09
    Brian GregoryB

    For example:
    Download this ZIP file: http://dslstats.me.uk/files/dslstats32W-6.5.zip
    Everything in the ZIP file is in a directory “dslstats32W-6.5”.
    However when I extract using right click “Extract Here” the name of the directory created is “2W-6.5” !
    I am running PA 22.00.09 on Windows 11. I have seen the same happen with some other kinds of archive too.

    Tech Support
    PA2023: Portable version missing?
    A

    Hello!
    Is there currently no portable version of PA2023 available?
    (When) do you plan to release one?
    Thanks!

    Tech Support
    Windows 11 bug in PA 22.00.09
    Brian GregoryB

    If I compress a folder to a .pa using right click, Compress to folder.pa and use the new Windows 11 menu then the Options, Configuration, Miscellaneous, Use normal relative path setting is always enabled.
    But I like this option disabled so I have to use the old style menu in order to get PA to compress a folder in the way I wish.

    Tech Support
    Missing Icons
    LuxorL

    Just tried using the Modern (Windows 10) Icon set and seeing a few missing icons in both PowerArchiver Burner and PowerArchiver Encryption screens . They are all there in the Minimalistik icon set and the only difference I can see is the former is blue and the latter grey. In version 22.00.9

    powerarc_2023-09-18_17-00-19.png

    powerarc_2023-09-18_17-01-05.png

    Tech Support
    [BUG] PA2023 still shows red beta icon set in context menu
    BigMikeB

    PA 22.00.09
    344c6c52-f03f-407b-ad76-8130b31936bb-image.png

    Tech Support
    [BUG] License not recognized
    BigMikeB

    PA 22.00.09 shows a nag screen, when I try to open some setting windows. I have already PA 2023 Toolbox and PA shows, that it’s licensed in the info dialog.

    a860bd81-3e71-4ce0-9988-74cd4189d43e-image.png

    0836bc83-8046-4a91-bc7b-68bd231100a3-image.png

    Tech Support
    Some strings are not translated in PA2023
    BigMikeB

    PA 22.00.09

    Some labels in the help toolbar are not translated:
    b3c1f5c4-b73d-49d8-9ed0-56294840838c-image.png

    Tech Support
    MSI release?
    J

    I’m looking forward to deploying PowerArchiver 2023 to my users. Can you tell us when the MSI will be available for download and distribution?

    Thanks.

    Tech Support
    Security vulnerabilities in 7zip / Update for PowerArchiver and PACL libraries?
    BigMikeB

    Hi there,

    there were some security issues fixed in 7zip:
    https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1165/
    https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1164/

    As it seems, that PowerArchiver and PACL use the 7zip libraries, could you please update them to the latest version?

    Tech Support
    Virtual Drive
    E

    Hi,

    From where I get PAVD2023.EXE? PowerArchiver 2023 tries to open it.
    But it seems, it tries to download PAVD2021.EXE.

    Thanks

    Tech Support
    Better ZPAQ support
    W

    I noticed that the version of ZPAQ used is older than the latest released 7.15 https://mattmahoney.net/dc/zpaq.html also there seems to be a newer fork that adds several features https://github.com/fcorbelli/zpaqfranz

    It would be useful to implement this latest version (it also maintains the same syntax and behavior as the latest official release if used the -715 flag) and add when opening a zpaq file a choice of the version of the files to show (e.g. as dummy folders represented the various versions present). Since any previous changes are stored with this format, it is possible to extract a snapshot of a certain date/version.

    Tech Support
    Bug with "Encrypt Archive" action
    W

    If I open a password-protected zipper file (created with WinRAR but I think that’s irrelevant), open it with PowerArchiver and run “Remove Encryption” on the same file, then reopen it and add a password with “Encrypt Archive,” the resulting archive will be protected with the old ZipCrypto algorithm and not AES as indicated.
    (this can be verified, for example, by trying to open the archive files with Windows Explorer, which does not support the AES algorithm)

    Tech Support
    PA 21.00.18 Action / Test behaves oddly for me on .PA files
    Brian GregoryB

    PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
    I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
    Discovered:
    a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
    b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files.

    Tech Support

    RAR problem

    Tech Support
    3
    9
    5828
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • I
      Imaginelane
      last edited by

      PA 2007 will not recognize RAR archives above *.R01. Is this a configuration thing? What needs to happen here?:confused:

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • TBGBeT
        TBGBe
        last edited by

        There is no need/benefit in “recognising” R08, R67 etc.
        Besides, partial extraction is not supported.

        D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          davidsplash @TBGBe
          last edited by

          this is a good point to make 7zip file manager supports this so why not pa, it can be done and is needed the other day at work i had to install the 7zip file manager cause of this program with pa. This will ecrtainmly drive custoimers away and towards winrar

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • I
            Imaginelane
            last edited by

            I’m glad it’s not my ineptitude. If I went in to folder options and related all the file extensions to PA RAR files it would probably work, but c’mon…another option would be to rename all the files using a batch renamer utility like File Renamer to have *_part1.rar as a name instead of *.R01…etc. That I know would work. The question is how much work should one have to do for a product that says they support such file types?

            TBGBeT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • TBGBeT
              TBGBe @Imaginelane
              last edited by

              But why is it necessary/needed :confused:
              *.rar. *.r00 and *.r01 are associated - I don’t see a benefit having “anyname.r28” associated.

              The work involved is to “bloat” the registry with 98 silly extension associations - this is why RAR changed their naming scheme in the first place.

              D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                davidsplash @TBGBe
                last edited by

                what i think he is trying to say yes it would be nice to have them associated. However the point that he also made was that you can not extract files from an incomplete set of spanned rar files which you can do with the 7zip filke manager and why is this.

                when will this be fixed

                TBGBeT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • TBGBeT
                  TBGBe @davidsplash
                  last edited by

                  @davidsplash:

                  … you can not extract files from an incomplete set of spanned rar files …

                  Yep
                  @TBGBe:

                  Besides, partial extraction is not supported.

                  As I said. :p

                  I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • I
                    Imaginelane @TBGBe
                    last edited by

                    Wow, I’m dumb…It handles it with even less BS than I could’ve imagined…open the .rar and it grabs the rest…duh…:o

                    TBGBeT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • TBGBeT
                      TBGBe @Imaginelane
                      last edited by

                      Ah now I see… You were referring to extracting, not the assoicated icons etc.

                      A misconception (they must be associated in order to extract) is not dumb by any means - but it sometimes helps to “Just try it first” ;)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post