-
在当今的数字时代，通信变得更加快捷和高效，教育领域也不例外。 罗切斯特高中是学校采用技术来加强学生、教师和家长之间沟通的典型例子。 他们使用的最重要的工具之一是学校电子邮件系统，该系统在多个方面都大[有裨益。
首先，罗彻斯特高中的电子邮件系统允许学生和教师之间进行及时有效的沟通。 过去，学生必须依靠面对面的会议或电话与老师 沟通，这可能很耗时，而且常 工作职能邮件数据库 常导致错过消息或误解。 然而，通过学校的电子邮件系统，学生可以快速地向他们的老师发送电子邮件并得到及时的回复。 这不仅可以节省时间，还可以进行清晰简洁的交流，这对于学业成功至关重要。
a320f9d3-78c0-4c6a-b75f-8d0e1d4691cc-image.png
其次，电子邮件系统使教师能够向学生和家长发送重要更新。 罗切斯特高中每周向家长发送时事通讯，告知他们学校活动、学业进展和其他重要信息。 这有助于家长及时了解孩子的教育情况，并让他们更多地参与孩子的学业之旅。 此外，教师可以使用电子邮件系统向学生发送有关即将到来的作业、测试或活动的提醒。 这对于可能难以记住截止日期或在校外有多项承诺的学生特别有用。
-
PA2023 Win10, (same problem with older releases but never reported)
PA Soft is installed on partition D. (exclusive for installed progs)
Then I created on my partition G: the folders as configured in PA Settings ‘Folders’.0fcf1b09-1b91-4b74-b250-f8cf908a3348-Ashampoo_Snap_maandag 20 maart 2023_11h54m34s.png
Screenshot 2023-03-20 121152.png
The problem : Any activity on PA is saved in these folders…
PA ignores them and still use the default settings. Whats wrong ? Regards, Pirrbe -
I am still using Powerarchiver 2022 and it does not show pdf markups in the preview. Is there a setting to get version 2022 to show pdf markups in the preview? If not, does this work in version 2023?
-
The question that I have about PA archives is what happens if say ConeXware, as a company, dies in the future? What happens to any PA files that are created today? Can these files be decompressed with a copy of a PowerArchiver that can no longer phone home to the mothership thus can’t be registered or activated?
I mean, I can understand that new PA files wouldn’t be able to be created if the program isn’t registered but what about an un-registered copy because well, the question that I posed above?
It’s questions like this that make me not want to store anything really valuable in PA files out of fear that I, at some point in the future, might lose access to said data inside those files. OK, 7ZIP might not be able to compress as heavily as PA but at least it’s open source and any 7ZIP files will still be able to be read and decompressed ten, twenty, or fifty years from now.
-
For some reason, the PowerArchiver functions in the Windows 11 context menu no longer work after the last Windows Update. Only the functions in the classic context menu function as they should.
I’ve tried uninstalling PowerArchiver and using RevoUninstaller to remove all bits and pieces that were left behind and did a clean install of PowerArchiver, it didn’t fix the issue. Other items in the Windows 11 context menu work.
-
Is this a known problem? Is there a fix coming? This is a primary reason I buy PA.
I’ve tried both methods I know to extract multiple zips at the same time. 1) Multi Extract feature in the GUI. 2) In Windows File Explorer, select multiple zips, right click, use PA context menu to Extract or Extract To…
Is there a setting I missed? Or maybe it really is processing in parallel, but I can’t detect it? Nothing tells me in the Processes in Task Manager that multiple PA extracts are running. And my CPU, memory and disk resources do not look like a lot of extracts are running.
I’m using PA 2022 Standard version 21.00.18 on Windows 11 Pro version 10.0.22621 Build 22621.
-
In the latest version of PA, on W11 (latest build/SP) when you try to use the first level context menu - NOTHING HAPPENS (particularly when you do this from Downloads or Documents folders) - however I noticed that it DOES WORK when you use the context menu from the Desktop. Going to the second level context menu does work however.
-
Is the version Preview 2023 also considered to be tested by the testteam ? In the past we got messages in the forum for testing out version x.x, to be downloaded by fastring, or I missed the one for 2023. (I discovered 2023 on the official web…)
CU, Pirrbe.
-
PA 2023 22.00.08
Long time no seeing. So I start up the new year with a first problem : the virtual driver cannot be installed. Reason : it is missing in the Fast Ring PatchBeam Update Service…
Virtual driver PA 2023-01-28 152607.png
It seems a standard problem with new releases :-)
Can I have a link or can it be fixed. Thank you. CU later -
Hi there, been a user since 13 years now and in past whenever I had a problem or question I could email, however since 3 weeks it seems like everybody is dead?
Anyway, as kind of a last resort, I post this email a 4th time but in this forum instead now, in the hope for help:
"This is the 3rd time I am emailing you guys as I am missing a working code for the preview of Power Archiver 2023Can you please help me? I am a 13 years lasting customer of yours, and I am shocked thatr for whatever reason my support tickets are ignored now, why?
thanks in advance!
All the best!
Joerg" -
Re: Explorer.exe Crash on right click
This appears to be happening again with the Power Archiver 2022 shell extensions.
When I have Use Explorer Shell Extensions enabled in Power Archiver Configuration and right-click on c:\Users\username\Start Menu, (hidden Junction file), File Explorer crashes.
I have version 21.00.15 (03/2022) 64-bit installed in Windows 10 Version 21H2 (Build 19044.1826).
-
PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
Discovered:
a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files. -
When the function for testing archives is invoked via the shell context menu (PowerArchiver > Test) then all the files in the archive get extracted to the current folder.
The test dialog reports as many errors as there are files in the archive but it fails to give any hint as to which files are supposed to be erroneous or what the nature of the problem might be. Comparing the extracted files to the originals shows no differences at all.
The .7z in question was produced with maximised compression settings in 7zip (taking forever but resulting in smaller archives than .7z produced by PowerArchiver with maximised settings). Therefore I wanted to see whether PowerArchiver can at least test .7z that it produced itself. Hence I had PowerArchiver convert a .pa with the same contents to .7z. There weren’t any errors reported but the resulting .7z contained fewer than half of the files contained in the .pa (137 of 366), so I scratched that test.
Performance is abysmal when testing via the context menu (e.g. almost 2 minutes for testing a .7z that 7zip tests in 4 seconds), but that is most likely due to the fact that the extracted files are written to disk. Testing the same .7z in the PowerArchiver GUI takes only 8 seconds but causes the mysterious appearance of a UAC dialog, as reported elsewhere.
The testing function is vital because PowerArchiver has a history of producing archives that it cannot unpack without errors or that do not conform to the respective file format standards (e.g. ZIP) so that other programs report them as erroneous.
The point of creating archives is that the files in them will most likely have to be extracted at some point. If the extraction cannot be guaranteed to produce correct results then the whole program is absolutely pointless. Actually, worse than pointless - it causes data loss and hence damage.
Buy a copy of 9.5 ?
-
hey all, if I buy a copy, will it be 9.5 or the old 9.25 ?
thanks -
As 9.5 is in beta, today (08.08.2005) the official version is 9.25, so that would be the version you buy.
Note: Although your license code would need to be changed for 9.5 (even for the beta) it is straightforward, see the “news” page for details of this.
-
Yes, the most important is that the upgrade from 9.25 to 9.5 is free. :)
-
ok thanks :)
-
Everyone who purchased PA from 1st of August 2005 will get free upgrade to PA2006 even if they are Business license users (purchase will count as if they purchased PA2006).
thanks,
-
How far back will a free upgrade to PA 2006 be considered? I don’t recall having an account page and using my email I got my serial from does not result in a password being sent to it.
Thanks,
Krank
-
How far back will a free upgrade to PA 2006 be considered? I don’t recall having an account page and using my email I got my serial from does not result in a password being sent to it.
Thanks,
Krank
hi,
just contact us via support button at top of the page with your order details.Few of the older orders were never entered online.
thanks,
-
I did that and will wait for support’s reply. Thanks again.
Krank
-
I am one of these old users and I just contacted your company about obtaining this account so I can get a new reg code and the email back asks me for my address and phone number. This kind of sent up a red flag, so I would like that request to be verified here by an administrator before I send that in.
As you can tell, I’m a little paranoid that my email somehow didn’t reach you and someone else is digging for my information. And please also tell me why this info is needed, thanks. Please don’t take this as an attack. I just try to be careful with my information during these times when information is stolen from hacked computers on a daily basis and spam emails and trojans try to get one to reveal bank accounts and the like.
Oh, and strangely enough SpamPal flagged this email for some reason- I’m glad I check my junk folder to make sure it’s junk.
-
@Qun:
I am one of these old users and I just contacted your company about obtaining this account so I can get a new reg code and the email back asks me for my address and phone number. This kind of sent up a red flag, so I would like that request to be verified here by an administrator before I send that in.
As you can tell, I’m a little paranoid that my email somehow didn’t reach you and someone else is digging for my information. And please also tell me why this info is needed, thanks. Please don’t take this as an attack. I just try to be careful with my information during these times when information is stolen from hacked computers on a daily basis and spam emails and trojans try to get one to reveal bank accounts and the like.
Oh, and strangely enough SpamPal flagged this email for some reason- I’m glad I check my junk folder to make sure it’s junk.
Hi,
we lost registration information for some of the first users we had (around 100), which is why we need full info from them again. Phone number is not really needed, it is just something you enter. Address is needed for our database reasons. Originally, it was needed for credit card processing company.
It is very hard to verify anything if we dont have basic address information. This info is absolutly not shared with anyone or anybody and will never be used unless we need to verify some change (for instance you changed emails or similar).
thanks!
-
Okay, I will email back my address then. Thanks for the reply. Interesting to know I was part of the initial 100 to pay for PA after it went shareware. :cool:
