• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.10.02
    spwolfS
    New version: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.10.02: Download: https://u.powerarchiver.com/pa2023/powarc221002.exe New build with new signature so shell extensions in Windows will function properly. Thanks everyone for your assistance!
    Tech Support
    Missing Icons
    LuxorL
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    Missing or ugly SFX-Icon
    MerowingerM
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    End of Powerarchiver
    D
    Powerarchiver is dead no updates to fix bugs no new features, no communication and errors in program update system with scripting errors. Duplicate context menus windows 11 no fixes no updates I declare that this is the last version.
    Tech Support
    Windows 11 Shell Extension crash
    W
    Copied the Take Command shortcut, changed Target to be wt.exe -p “Take Command” and saved it. Right-clicked to get to properties and Explorer crashed. (wt.exe is the Microsoft Terminal program, which I have installed from the Microsoft Store.) The Target path had changed to: C:\Users{username}\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps\wt.exe -p “Take Command” Created a new shortcut in a Start Menu folder and set the command line to the same, and it crashed the same. Created a new shortcut and set the command line to mspaint.exe (also a Windows Store app) and Explorer crashed on right-click on the shortcut. It appears PowerArchiver shell extensions doesn’t handle Windows Store apps in shortcuts properly. Perhaps it needs better defensive coding around checking the Target of shortcuts, or just ignoring shortcuts altogether. Running PA 22.00.11 on Windows 11 24H2 Build 26100.6584
    Tech Support
    Affected by winrar/.rar vulnerability?
    C
    Was Power Archiver affected by the WinRAR/.rar vulnerability discovered by ESET researchers recently? Not sure if PA is using their libraries for extraction.
    Tech Support
    updates
    D
    anything planned for the future or is this software just dead now?
    Tech Support
    Ultimate zip was made by powerarchiver
    D
    From google search AI Overview Yes, that’s correct. UltimateZip was indeed a product of the same company that developed PowerArchiver, and it was essentially a rebranded version of PowerArchiver. It was discontinued and replaced by PowerArchiver.
    Tech Support
    News/Update on PowerArchiver/Connexion in 2024
    TheAndyMacT
    Hi everyone, some good news about PowerArchiver… I’ve managed to get in touch with the original developer of PowerArchiver, Ivan Petrovic, and he has confirmed that the product is not dead or abandoned, in fact it is still very much alive! There has been a hiatus over the past months for various reasons, but that we should expect to see stuff coming through in the coming months (hopefully the next 2 months).
    Tech Support
    BETA PowerArchive 22.00.11 - Windows 11 Context Menu duplicated/additional tier
    TheAndyMacT
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    No Icons for SFX-Archives
    MerowingerM
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    Zip extraction from windows 11 by windows
    D
    Basically I used powerarchiver context menus to zip up a folder then i used windows 11 own built in zip extractor via the context menu to extract all and this is where it throw up a fault. , I’m using windows 11 . The file that was a problem in the zip that windows 11 could not extract was iva “babe” cotton.jpg I know it has non standard quotes in it. However I had winrar on the computer and tried the exact same method with their context menu compress to zip and then I extracted the file with windows own extract all context menu and it had no problems. This indicates that powerarchiver is doing something different with iva “babe” cotton.jpg compressing to zip. Then I changed iva “babe” cotton.jpg to iva babe cotton.jpg and compressed it with powerarchiver and then tried it with windows 11 extract all and had no problems. It looks like powerarchiver is doing something to that one file that has quotes in it. Please note that powerarchiver extracted both zip files with no problems, only windows built in zip extraction had the fault. Reason I’m letting people know in case they send zip files with special characters in files names to people who do not have powerarchiver. When will a fix be implemented?
    Tech Support
    Installer problem
    L
    On installing the program I am getting the error message: "Unable to execute file c:\Program Files\PowerArchiver\pashutil.exe CreateProcess failed: code 2 The system cannot find the file specified" This can’t be right! I am using the latest official build of Windows 11
    Tech Support
    Button alignment. About window.
    LuxorL
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    Button alignment on config window.
    LuxorL
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.10
    spwolfS
    New version: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.10: Download: https://u.powerarchiver.com/pa2023/powarc220010.exe New build for some bug fixes and issues - full list to come with new update. Please test and see if you have any issues. Thanks everyone for your assistance!
    Tech Support
    BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.11
    spwolfS
    New version: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.11: Download: https://u.powerarchiver.com/pa2023/powarc220011.exe New build for some bug fixes and issues - full list to come with new update. Please test and see if you have any issues. Thanks everyone for your assistance!
    Tech Support
    THE SSL CERTIFICATE FOR *.POWERARCHIVER.COM HAS EXPIRED.
    Brian GregoryB
    @spwolf @Mili THE SSL CERTIFICATE FOR *.POWERARCHIVER.COM HAS EXPIRED.
    Tech Support
    PA2023 22.00.09 trying to delete a directory from a tar file.
    Brian GregoryB
    I had a large .tar file (a backed up WSL) and I want to delete a few directories and their contents from it using PA2023. PA just destroys the whole archive as soon as I try to delete a directory, leaving it in a state where PA2023 won’t even open it any more. I tried several times and also tried compressing it to .tar.xz instead - same result. This should either actually work, or it should say operation not supported and do nothing.
    Tech Support
    PA 2023: No portable version?
    A
    Hello! The regular version of PA 2023 is out for over 6 months now, but there is still no sign of the portable release. (When) will there be one? Thanks!
    Tech Support

    Progress bars

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Tech Support
    19 Posts 3 Posters 7.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • spwolfS Offline
      spwolf conexware @drteeth
      last edited by

      @drteeth:

      It’s fast. But the bar never reaches 100% and it used to. Something has changed recently…noticed by moles42 as well.

      I’ve noticed this on 175 MB archives. You mentioned this before where the bar does not appear at all for small files. To me, aesthetically speaking, that is better than it never reaching 100% - only talking about the lower bar (of the two).

      Regards

      DrT

      its not never, but it skips updating progress for the files that are too small (literally progress takes more time than file extraction), regardless of the other files in the archive.

      But this might not be connected to that - what exact format are you using?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • drteethD Offline
        drteeth
        last edited by

        Hi,

        The issue does not seem to be related to format, but I’m extracting ZIPs and RARs.

        Sorry, but in spite of looking hard, I have (lately) not seen the lower progress bar get to full scale (100%). The numerical display does.

        How much of a slow down does the bar cause on a modern computer? Is it necessary not to update the bar? Can it be made user configurable?

        Best regards

        DrT

        spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • spwolfS Offline
          spwolf conexware @drteeth
          last edited by

          @drteeth:

          Hi,

          The issue does not seem to be related to format, but I’m extracting ZIPs and RARs.

          Sorry, but in spite of looking hard, I have (lately) not seen the lower progress bar get to full scale (100%). The numerical display does.

          How much of a slow down does the bar cause on a modern computer? Is it necessary not to update the bar? Can it be made user configurable?

          Best regards

          DrT

          i dont think it the issue we are talking about… i see progress bar just fine. How are you extracting the archives?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • spwolfS Offline
            spwolf conexware
            last edited by

            btw, it is upper progress that does not get intialized, lower should work fine (full progress)… it is actually quite an timesaver ;-)

            drteethD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • drteethD Offline
              drteeth @spwolf
              last edited by

              @spwolf:

              btw, it is upper progress that does not get intialized, lower should work fine (full progress)… it is actually quite an timesaver ;-)

              The issue is with the lower bar…the upper one is so quick anyway. Win 7 32-bit.

              I’ll try to explain better. When the completed % shows 100%, the lower bar is never to the right fully. The smaller the archive the further to the left it is @ 100%. I have seen 100% when the lower bar is only 1/3 the way across. The mostI have seen is about 80% of the way across.

              When I initially saw this, I had to check that the archive had been extracted completely and without mistakes!

              I am extracting the files by right-clicking and then clicking extracting to <folder name=“”>.

              Regards

              DrT</folder>

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • spwolfS Offline
                spwolf conexware
                last edited by

                and i cant get it to show 75% ;-)… it always goes to 100%. It probably has to do with file contents of the archive or something more specific about the archive. Try to see what exactly causes it!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • drteethD Offline
                  drteeth
                  last edited by

                  It happens with every archive I try. Either a single archive or a multi-part archive. As it happens all the time I will not be able to track it down. I could try it on another PC or another OS if you think it would help.

                  It never reaches 100%. A multi-part archive of a 700MB file takes it to about 95%+ and with a single archive of 7MB it only gets a third of the way. The text which shows % completed is accurate.

                  DrT

                  spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • spwolfS Offline
                    spwolf conexware @drteeth
                    last edited by

                    @drteeth:

                    It happens with every archive I try. Either a single archive or a multi-part archive. As it happens all the time I will not be able to track it down. I could try it on another PC or another OS if you think it would help.

                    It never reaches 100%. A multi-part archive of a 700MB file takes it to about 95%+ and with a single archive of 7MB it only gets a third of the way. The text which shows % completed is accurate.

                    DrT

                    hm, does it show less progress on smaller archives? I think this might be due to the animation of progress bar being slower than actual progress. You will not be able to see progress going from 0 to 100 when it happens in 3 seconds for instance. Same goes for any of big jumps, if progress actually jumps from 95 to 100 in 1 seconds, it will be gone before actual animation manages to make the jump. At least thats what i am seeing here, it might not be the same thing you got?

                    Seems to be related to animated progress bar in aero… if you set windows classic theme, it will go all the way up properly, probably because it is not animated…

                    moles42M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • moles42M Offline
                      moles42 Alpha Testers @spwolf
                      last edited by

                      maybe these examples will help demonstrate…

                      test one is a small compressed file and displays the point drteeth is talking about I think.

                      the second example is a larger compressed file but it works fine…so it would seem it only occurs on small zip files.

                      http://www.zshare.net/download/695440365382fff7/
                      

                      Windows 10 Pro x64
                      Intel Core i5 3470 @ 3.20GHz
                      8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3

                      spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • spwolfS Offline
                        spwolf conexware @moles42
                        last edited by

                        @moles42:

                        maybe these examples will help demonstrate…

                        test one is a small compressed file and displays the point drteeth is talking about I think.

                        the second example is a larger compressed file but it works fine…so it would seem it only occurs on small zip files.

                        http://www.zshare.net/download/695440365382fff7/
                        

                        yes, it is due to Windows progress bar animation being too slow for very fast progress… trying using windows classic theme and it works “better” but sure does look ugly eh :-).

                        We use standard windows progress bar API… and we send it percentages you see written above the progress bar.

                        drteethD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • drteethD Offline
                          drteeth @spwolf
                          last edited by

                          @spwolf:

                          yes, it is due to Windows progress bar animation being too slow for very fast progress… trying using windows classic theme and it works “better” but sure does look ugly eh :-).

                          We use standard windows progress bar API… and we send it percentages you see written above the progress bar.

                          Spot on with the animated bar diagnosis.

                          Regards

                          DrT

                          spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • spwolfS Offline
                            spwolf conexware @drteeth
                            last edited by

                            @drteeth:

                            Spot on with the animated bar diagnosis.

                            Regards

                            DrT

                            if thats the biggest problem win7 has, they are on the roll :-)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • drteethD Offline
                              drteeth
                              last edited by

                              Apparently, the animated hourglass in the released version is missing a frame (shock, horror) and hacks exist to transfer the full animation from the released RC versions.

                              Seriously, OT - I think I have discovered a bug where Win7 misreads NIC MAC addresses.

                              With best wishes…

                              DrT

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post