-
PA2023 Win10, (same problem with older releases but never reported)
PA Soft is installed on partition D. (exclusive for installed progs)
Then I created on my partition G: the folders as configured in PA Settings ‘Folders’.0fcf1b09-1b91-4b74-b250-f8cf908a3348-Ashampoo_Snap_maandag 20 maart 2023_11h54m34s.png
Screenshot 2023-03-20 121152.png
The problem : Any activity on PA is saved in these folders…
PA ignores them and still use the default settings. Whats wrong ? Regards, Pirrbe -
I am still using Powerarchiver 2022 and it does not show pdf markups in the preview. Is there a setting to get version 2022 to show pdf markups in the preview? If not, does this work in version 2023?
-
The question that I have about PA archives is what happens if say ConeXware, as a company, dies in the future? What happens to any PA files that are created today? Can these files be decompressed with a copy of a PowerArchiver that can no longer phone home to the mothership thus can’t be registered or activated?
I mean, I can understand that new PA files wouldn’t be able to be created if the program isn’t registered but what about an un-registered copy because well, the question that I posed above?
It’s questions like this that make me not want to store anything really valuable in PA files out of fear that I, at some point in the future, might lose access to said data inside those files. OK, 7ZIP might not be able to compress as heavily as PA but at least it’s open source and any 7ZIP files will still be able to be read and decompressed ten, twenty, or fifty years from now.
-
For some reason, the PowerArchiver functions in the Windows 11 context menu no longer work after the last Windows Update. Only the functions in the classic context menu function as they should.
I’ve tried uninstalling PowerArchiver and using RevoUninstaller to remove all bits and pieces that were left behind and did a clean install of PowerArchiver, it didn’t fix the issue. Other items in the Windows 11 context menu work.
-
Is this a known problem? Is there a fix coming? This is a primary reason I buy PA.
I’ve tried both methods I know to extract multiple zips at the same time. 1) Multi Extract feature in the GUI. 2) In Windows File Explorer, select multiple zips, right click, use PA context menu to Extract or Extract To…
Is there a setting I missed? Or maybe it really is processing in parallel, but I can’t detect it? Nothing tells me in the Processes in Task Manager that multiple PA extracts are running. And my CPU, memory and disk resources do not look like a lot of extracts are running.
I’m using PA 2022 Standard version 21.00.18 on Windows 11 Pro version 10.0.22621 Build 22621.
-
In the latest version of PA, on W11 (latest build/SP) when you try to use the first level context menu - NOTHING HAPPENS (particularly when you do this from Downloads or Documents folders) - however I noticed that it DOES WORK when you use the context menu from the Desktop. Going to the second level context menu does work however.
-
Is the version Preview 2023 also considered to be tested by the testteam ? In the past we got messages in the forum for testing out version x.x, to be downloaded by fastring, or I missed the one for 2023. (I discovered 2023 on the official web…)
CU, Pirrbe.
-
PA 2023 22.00.08
Long time no seeing. So I start up the new year with a first problem : the virtual driver cannot be installed. Reason : it is missing in the Fast Ring PatchBeam Update Service…
Virtual driver PA 2023-01-28 152607.png
It seems a standard problem with new releases :-)
Can I have a link or can it be fixed. Thank you. CU later -
Hi there, been a user since 13 years now and in past whenever I had a problem or question I could email, however since 3 weeks it seems like everybody is dead?
Anyway, as kind of a last resort, I post this email a 4th time but in this forum instead now, in the hope for help:
"This is the 3rd time I am emailing you guys as I am missing a working code for the preview of Power Archiver 2023Can you please help me? I am a 13 years lasting customer of yours, and I am shocked thatr for whatever reason my support tickets are ignored now, why?
thanks in advance!
All the best!
Joerg" -
Re: Explorer.exe Crash on right click
This appears to be happening again with the Power Archiver 2022 shell extensions.
When I have Use Explorer Shell Extensions enabled in Power Archiver Configuration and right-click on c:\Users\username\Start Menu, (hidden Junction file), File Explorer crashes.
I have version 21.00.15 (03/2022) 64-bit installed in Windows 10 Version 21H2 (Build 19044.1826).
-
PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
Discovered:
a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files. -
When the function for testing archives is invoked via the shell context menu (PowerArchiver > Test) then all the files in the archive get extracted to the current folder.
The test dialog reports as many errors as there are files in the archive but it fails to give any hint as to which files are supposed to be erroneous or what the nature of the problem might be. Comparing the extracted files to the originals shows no differences at all.
The .7z in question was produced with maximised compression settings in 7zip (taking forever but resulting in smaller archives than .7z produced by PowerArchiver with maximised settings). Therefore I wanted to see whether PowerArchiver can at least test .7z that it produced itself. Hence I had PowerArchiver convert a .pa with the same contents to .7z. There weren’t any errors reported but the resulting .7z contained fewer than half of the files contained in the .pa (137 of 366), so I scratched that test.
Performance is abysmal when testing via the context menu (e.g. almost 2 minutes for testing a .7z that 7zip tests in 4 seconds), but that is most likely due to the fact that the extracted files are written to disk. Testing the same .7z in the PowerArchiver GUI takes only 8 seconds but causes the mysterious appearance of a UAC dialog, as reported elsewhere.
The testing function is vital because PowerArchiver has a history of producing archives that it cannot unpack without errors or that do not conform to the respective file format standards (e.g. ZIP) so that other programs report them as erroneous.
The point of creating archives is that the files in them will most likely have to be extracted at some point. If the extraction cannot be guaranteed to produce correct results then the whole program is absolutely pointless. Actually, worse than pointless - it causes data loss and hence damage.
SOLVED 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same
-
When creating a .pa archive using optimise strong which contains various files types I noticed that file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same and should be treated identically.
-
@Brian-Gregory said in 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same:
When creating a .pa archive using optimise strong which contains various files types I noticed that file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same and should be treated identically.
cool - so what method is used for each? And which one gets better compression?
-
Until @Brian-Gregory answers, I did a quick test, and can confirm his point.
For the same file, tar.gz is compressed, while tgz not.
@spwolf said in 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same:
@Brian-Gregory said in 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same:
When creating a .pa archive using optimise strong which contains various files types I noticed that file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same and should be treated identically.
cool - so what method is used for each? And which one gets better compression?
-
Sorry. Wrong image:
-
@nikkho sweet, so whats the compression like for the one being reflated? try individual file compression with .tar.gz one. I wonder how it compares to original one. Is it extra 8% or?
-
@spwolf said in 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same:
@nikkho sweet, so whats the compression like for the one being reflated? try individual file compression with .tar.gz one. I wonder how it compares to original one. Is it extra 8% or?
It can be a huge improvement when there are a lot of them in a solid archive:
-
Did a simple test. Files were from Volkov Commander: https://vvv.kiev.ua/download/vc49908a.zip
I extracted them, and compressed as a tar.gz in PA. Then I copied it to a same file with tgz extension.
Now, added both onto separate archives:98.113 vc49908a.tar.gz.pa
100.103 vc49908a.tgz
100.103 vc49908a.tar.gz
100.685 vc49908a.tgz.pa
106.255 vc49908a.zip -
@spwolf .tar.gz is handled like a zip file which I think is correct because it gives good results. While .tgz is, I think, handled like an unknown file type.
-
@Brian-Gregory said in 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same:
@spwolf .tar.gz is handled like a zip file which I think is correct because it gives good results. While .tgz is, I think, handled like an unknown file type.
Agree.
-
@Brian-Gregory said in 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same:
@spwolf .tar.gz is handled like a zip file which I think is correct because it gives good results. While .tgz is, I think, handled like an unknown file type.
yes, we use reflate for tar.gz and should be with tgz too… reflate “unpacks” deflate streams and compresses them with plzma instead of deflate… so result is always going to be better, how much is determined by the data inside. If it is something very compressible, then result is going to be much better.
-
@spwolf Why can’t I upload PNG images any more?
-
@Brian-Gregory apparently some bug with this version of forums, try using upload button or paste (not sure which one are you trying)
-
@spwolf Paste how? I’m using the upload image button.
-
@Brian-Gregory copy it first and then ctrl-p into the post you are writing… one of these works, sometimes both… discovered last week by pierrbe… there is new version out, we will update it in the next few days, likely it will solve the problem. Thanks!
-
@spwolf I don’t see how ctrl-p is suddenly not gong to act as the print command.
-
@Brian-Gregory obviously you are much more rested than me last night so you would use ctrl-v :)
-
@spwolf But nothing happens with ctrl-v or right click paste. Does it have to be a certain kind of image in the clipboard? Or a certain web browser? I’m using Google Chrome.
-
open it in image viewer, copy-c and then copy-v to the post reply…
it should work in chrome right click> copy image but I use Snap for captures and it automatically opens up there so I cant really test it.
I am sure @cetko will update forum software early next week so it should be fixed by then anyway.
-
@spwolf Nope. Doesn’t work.
-
@Brian-Gregory . Very frustrating : sometimes it works but then suddenly ‘not enough privileges’… I use the Edge Explorer Win10 and the standard Snipping Tool of Win10. (copy/past = ctrl-c / ctrl-v ctrl-p-printscreen !!?). I also tried to past first the snip in Word and then copy/past that image and other soft… but the problem is that communication third part soft.
I hope that the new update will avoid a nervous breakdown.
 Not enough privileges for this action… -
@brian-gregory said in 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same:
@spwolf Nope. Doesn’t work.
try now, new forum update installed…
-
@spwolf said in 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same:
@brian-gregory said in 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same:
@spwolf Nope. Doesn’t work.
try now, new forum update installed…
It works.
Thanks. -
@brian-gregory said in 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same:
@spwolf said in 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same:
@brian-gregory said in 17.00.90 Creating archive.pa with Optimise strong. file.tar.gz and file.tgz are treated differently when they are in fact exactly the same:
@spwolf Nope. Doesn’t work.
try now, new forum update installed…
It works.
Thanks.sweet!
-
Problem in original post fixed in .91
Thank you.
