Recent Topics
-
Solved Can not change or see options in the configuration
Tech Support5 -
Solved I think SVG files should be treated as text files.
Wishlist3 -
Unsolved PowerArchiver shell extensions possibly crashing windows explorer.exe
Tech Support3 -
Unsolved line spacing in file list on hires screen
Tech Support2 -
Unsolved Can not extract iTunes installer
Tech Support4 -
Unsolved %APPNAME% should not contain the version
Translations10 -
Unsolved PowerArchiver 18.01.04 / Shell Extension in PowerArchiver
Tech Support1 -
Solved Language Issues (Dutch)
Tech Support21 -
Unsolved Dark skin, button not transparent.
Tech Support3 -
Fast Ring: PowerArchiver 2018 18.01.04
Tech Support7 -
Unsolved french text does not fit in add window and few other translation issues
Tech Support7 -
Solved Shell extension: option to move the Compress With Options into the submenu
Tech Support6 -
Solved GUI: Buttons not aligned
Tech Support6 -
Solved [BUG] UAC support broken in PowerArchiver 2018
Tech Support18 -
Solved Not prompting for Password
Tech Support11 -
Solved auto open first level in folder treeview when archive is opened
Wishlist7 -
Solved Command Line Switch for View Mode
Wishlist12
PowerArchiver 2017 first screen....
-
First screenshot of PA 2017 running… few things are immediately understandable from the pic
-
@spwolf is powerarc64.exe a native 64-bit app now?
My Nerdgasm is building… LOLUpdate, nm it is and my mind is blown
-
@ckit said in PowerArchiver 2017 first screen....:
@spwolf is powerarc64.exe a native 64-bit app now?
My Nerdgasm is building… LOLUpdate, nm it is and my mind is blown
64bit brings little on the table on its own… but check another clue - compression speed. Whats going on here?
-
multicore!
-
@guido said in PowerArchiver 2017 first screen....:
multicore!
only running 8.7%… this is compression
Try large file with ZIP, whats the speed in MBs?
-
there is also this… heavy multicore, but different.
-
@spwolf Nice!!
-
updated with another prics showing new navbar and new feature
-
PA 2017 is a beast!
-
@skypx Is that at Strong/Max or Normal? 16t is alot memory wise
Probably get similar speed by using 10-12 threads. Something you could test a bit I guess :-).
-
That was strong/max, and it’s sooooo much quicker than PA 2016. Kudos to the devs!
-
Try Optimized Fast at Ultra and then at Normal… what do you get there? But do it on SSD, not regular HDD. And lower treads for more speed. Ultra can do 8t, but Normal do 4t max.
