BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.10.02

[spwolf]

picture tutorial :-)

[sjan26s2]

@spwolf:

picture tutorial :-)

And?
What does that mean?

I already know about those settings…and surely they affect ALL RAR compression, no matter the method.

[spwolf]

@sjan26s2:

And?
What does that mean?

I already know about those settings…and surely they affect ALL RAR compression, no matter the method.

change your setting to indicated above and try compression test again. Thank you.

[sjan26s2]

@spwolf:

change your setting to indicated above and try compression test again. Thank you.

Just did. And as I suspected, the results are exactly the same as before….the file sizes are indeed different each time…

Issue STILL exists…

[ckit]

Just checked mine and my RAR Maximum is different -> -m5 -mdg -mc10:128t

[sjan26s2]

@ckit:

Just checked mine and my RAR Maximum is different -> -m5 -mdg -mc10:128t

That’s what I had also.

But I changed it to just -m5 as suggested and ran the tests again, and that’s what I was talking about.

[spwolf]

@ckit:

Just checked mine and my RAR Maximum is different -> -m5 -mdg -mc10:128t

there were 2 problems, first setting was not compatible with later WR versions… so it was fixed. And then compress to .rar always used default one (compress with options used config setting as it should). Now both of these should work fine, check it out:
http://dl.powerarchiver.com/2016/powarc160204.exe

[kefayatkhan]

@sjan26s2:

I just got the same issue right now with RAR files this time.
The file I’m compressing is called Ricochet Xtreme.exe and its 7,336KB in size.

I set up the RAR Command Profile to have Maximum Compression and Default RAR5 Method with Solid Archive enabled.

I compress the file by right clicking and selecting “Compress to xxx.rar”. The file size is 7,306KB.

I now right-click and select Rar + Options and select Maximum Compression and Default RAR5 Method with Solid Archive enabled. I click add, and the file size is 7,304KB.

Not much difference I know, but there should be NO difference at all, since its just the same compression just done a different way.

Tried it more than 5 times each way, and the same results each time.

this a file that is so small and if we compress small file so it change alittle bit
like if you change a picture with 793KB after compress it would be 792KB or 792.5 KB because the picture size is so less and if we compress a file with 1.3GB after compress it would be 1.2GB or 1.1GB which reduce up to 100MB size
so file compressing belong to file size
and the file you want to compress is so small ( about 7MB) so if you compress this file it would be about 6.8MB
hope to find the answer

[Brian Gregory]

Do did the problem with 7z files mentioned in #1 exist or not?
If so is it fixed or not?

[Mili]

Hi Brian,

We’ve just tested two files, a 170mb file and a 1GB file, via Compress to 7z and Compress w options>7z
Compression profile changed to LZMA2 Ultra.
Also tried with LZMA Ultra.

In both cases, both files resulted in same file size of the compressed 7z file.
Seems fixed.

If you happen to come across a specific situation where the issue seems present, please let us know and we’ll test immediately.

Thanks!