-
When the function for testing archives is invoked via the shell context menu (PowerArchiver > Test) then all the files in the archive get extracted to the current folder.
The test dialog reports as many errors as there are files in the archive but it fails to give any hint as to which files are supposed to be erroneous or what the nature of the problem might be. Comparing the extracted files to the originals shows no differences at all.
The .7z in question was produced with maximised compression settings in 7zip (taking forever but resulting in smaller archives than .7z produced by PowerArchiver with maximised settings). Therefore I wanted to see whether PowerArchiver can at least test .7z that it produced itself. Hence I had PowerArchiver convert a .pa with the same contents to .7z. There weren’t any errors reported but the resulting .7z contained fewer than half of the files contained in the .pa (137 of 366), so I scratched that test.
Performance is abysmal when testing via the context menu (e.g. almost 2 minutes for testing a .7z that 7zip tests in 4 seconds), but that is most likely due to the fact that the extracted files are written to disk. Testing the same .7z in the PowerArchiver GUI takes only 8 seconds but causes the mysterious appearance of a UAC dialog, as reported elsewhere.
The testing function is vital because PowerArchiver has a history of producing archives that it cannot unpack without errors or that do not conform to the respective file format standards (e.g. ZIP) so that other programs report them as erroneous.
The point of creating archives is that the files in them will most likely have to be extracted at some point. If the extraction cannot be guaranteed to produce correct results then the whole program is absolutely pointless. Actually, worse than pointless - it causes data loss and hence damage.
-
In PowerArchiver 2023 22.00.06 configuration, the option labelled “Start PowerArchiver 2023 Starter when my computer starts” seems to be redundant.
I am only allowed to change this option when PA Starter is disabled, and then it seems to be ignored.
When I enable PA Starter this option is forced to the enabled state.
I think it’d be good to remove “Start PowerArchiver 2023 Starter when my computer starts” completely. I’ve always found it confusing having both options.
Added later: However i don’t particularly want to use queue but I do like having the PAStarter icon in my tray area.
-
W10 Pro 22H2 - 64 -bit
PA 22.00.06 (PA 2023)
It has been the case with previous versions of PowerArchiver, but I had hoped that the latest might behave differently. Not so, I’m afraid.
I have, for various obscure reasons, created a few .pa archives, mainly in the hope that they will save me some more space. From time to time, I use the “Test” option to check that important archives are OK and uncorrupted.
With every .pa archive I’ve tested, the process runs through OK but then reports that there are errors. This is always the number of files in the archive e.g. if 11 files, then 11 errors reported.
In the .pa, I can:-
preview the files (usually PDF) extract some or all files and look at or use them convert the .pa to a .zip or .zipx archive, which then works fine and tests without errorsIs it the case that the Test routine isn’t designed for .pa archives, or is there another reason? Although the .pa seems to function properly, despite the test reporting errors, I would like to be sure that every .pa is OK and not “broken”.
Some of the .pas are quite old and produced with earlier PA versions (they are truly “archives”). If I extract all the files in the old .pa, create a new, fresh .pa and add back the files to that, then test the new, no errors (at least in the .pa I’ve tried this on) are reported. This would suggest a mismatch between old .pas and newer versions of PA itself.
-
PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
Discovered:
a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files. -
Clipboard02.jpg
See the, supposedly, blank space where the green box is? It’s like that in Modern Light theme too. I can toggle it, but it’s missing text or shouldn’t be there I guess?
Thanks :)
-
Dear @Alpha-Testers and all of our users,
time has come for testing of PowerArchiver and PACL for macOS.
Please let us know here if you have Mac and can test latest builds.Features implemented:
PowerArchiver 2020 - tabbing, opening, extracting, adding, testing, favorite folders, support for multiple languages, opening via Finder, explorer mode, installer.
PACL 10 - support for most formats and features in Windows version.Upcoming: Tools such as archive converter, batch zip, multi-extract.
To start testing, please sign up here in this thread, and we will send you latest build.
thank you!
Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h54m56s_008_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m05s_009_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m14s_010_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m30s_011_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m39s_012_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m49s_013_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h56m00s_014_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h54m43s_007_.png
76e97ab9-8d75-4175-9ce8-446500031f38-image.png
-
For some reason, the PowerArchiver functions in the Windows 11 context menu no longer work after the last Windows Update. Only the functions in the classic context menu function as they should.
I’ve tried uninstalling PowerArchiver and using RevoUninstaller to remove all bits and pieces that were left behind and did a clean install of PowerArchiver, it didn’t fix the issue. Other items in the Windows 11 context menu work.
New Windows Explorer Icons
-
I’ve installed PA 2016 16.00.43, and I’d like to comment about the new Windows Explorer icons.
Basically, they’re very bad, specially in the standard Details view mode. The old icons were clear, sharp, with a defined shape and a small piece of text in them that showed the compression type at a glance. The new PA 2016 file type icons, on the contrary, are (as far as I can notice) fuzzy more or less square-y shaped colored blobs, and so indistinct from everything else that I have absolutely no idea, by its icon alone, whether I’m looking at a compressed file or if it’s some executable or a rare document type.
This is so bad that now, to find compressed files in a folder, I must click the “Type” column so as to sort files by type, and then scroll until I find the “PowerArchiver” entries.
The attached screenshot shows an example of how confusing this can be. Try to spot the compressed files at a glance. If you’re like me, you thought “the 7Z one”, and completely missed the .zip and the .tar.gz ones.
So, please, before releasing PA 2016 fix these icons so that they’re at least as sharp, immediately recognizable and good usability-wise as the previous ones were, or if that’s not possible, please bring back the old icons back until you can actually fix the new ones.
Thanks! :)
-
I’ve installed PA 2016 16.00.43, and I’d like to comment about the new Windows Explorer icons.
Basically, they’re very bad, specially in the standard Details view mode. The old icons were clear, sharp, with a defined shape and a small piece of text in them that showed the compression type at a glance. The new PA 2016 file type icons, on the contrary, are (as far as I can notice) fuzzy more or less square-y shaped colored blobs, and so indistinct from everything else that I have absolutely no idea, by its icon alone, whether I’m looking at a compressed file or if it’s some executable or a rare document type.
This is so bad that now, to find compressed files in a folder, I must click the “Type” column so as to sort files by type, and then scroll until I find the “PowerArchiver” entries.
The attached screenshot shows an example of how confusing this can be. Try to spot the compressed files at a glance. If you’re like me, you thought “the 7Z one”, and completely missed the .zip and the .tar.gz ones.
So, please, before releasing PA 2016 fix these icons so that they’re at least as sharp, immediately recognizable and good usability-wise as the previous ones were, or if that’s not possible, please bring back the old icons back until you can actually fix the new ones.
Thanks! :)
Latest release:
http://dl.powerarchiver.com/2016/powarc160055.exeCheck them out… they dont have extension writing on them, but are hand drawn now at 16px.
-
Latest release:
http://dl.powerarchiver.com/2016/powarc160055.exeCheck them out… they dont have extension writing on them, but are hand drawn now at 16px.
These may be an improvement, but personally I’d still like to be able to choose the old set somehow.
-
HI.
For me I like the old Icons from Powerarchiver 2015 more.
In the Explorer I see at once which compression is used and the Icons have an better contrast.Is it possible to bring the Explorer Icons from Powerarchiver 2015 bag to Powerarchiver 2016?
MfG
MDuss -
HI.
For me I like the old Icons from Powerarchiver 2015 more.
In the Explorer I see at once which compression is used and the Icons have an better contrast.Is it possible to bring the Explorer Icons from Powerarchiver 2015 bag to Powerarchiver 2016?
MfG
MDusseverything is possible for our great users!
I am thinking about creating icon packs for formats with all of PA’s currently available icons so far (from 1999 until today). Main problem is making icon cache refresh itself but it should not be hard.
thanks everyone for suggestions!
-
I have here an Virtual PC running with Powerarchiver 2015. So if someone wanted the Explorer Icons from 2015 I can pack them in an archive and postetd it here.
MfG
MDuss
