For example:
Download this ZIP file: http://dslstats.me.uk/files/dslstats32W-6.5.zip
Everything in the ZIP file is in a directory “dslstats32W-6.5”.
However when I extract using right click “Extract Here” the name of the directory created is “2W-6.5” !
I am running PA 22.00.09 on Windows 11. I have seen the same happen with some other kinds of archive too.
Hello!
Is there currently no portable version of PA2023 available?
(When) do you plan to release one?
Thanks!
If I compress a folder to a .pa using right click, Compress to folder.pa and use the new Windows 11 menu then the Options, Configuration, Miscellaneous, Use normal relative path setting is always enabled.
But I like this option disabled so I have to use the old style menu in order to get PA to compress a folder in the way I wish.
Just tried using the Modern (Windows 10) Icon set and seeing a few missing icons in both PowerArchiver Burner and PowerArchiver Encryption screens . They are all there in the Minimalistik icon set and the only difference I can see is the former is blue and the latter grey. In version 22.00.9
powerarc_2023-09-18_17-00-19.png
powerarc_2023-09-18_17-01-05.png
PA 22.00.09
344c6c52-f03f-407b-ad76-8130b31936bb-image.png
PA 22.00.09 shows a nag screen, when I try to open some setting windows. I have already PA 2023 Toolbox and PA shows, that it’s licensed in the info dialog.
a860bd81-3e71-4ce0-9988-74cd4189d43e-image.png
0836bc83-8046-4a91-bc7b-68bd231100a3-image.png
PA 22.00.09
Some labels in the help toolbar are not translated:
b3c1f5c4-b73d-49d8-9ed0-56294840838c-image.png
I’m looking forward to deploying PowerArchiver 2023 to my users. Can you tell us when the MSI will be available for download and distribution?
Thanks.
Hi there,
there were some security issues fixed in 7zip:
https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1165/
https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1164/
As it seems, that PowerArchiver and PACL use the 7zip libraries, could you please update them to the latest version?
Hi,
From where I get PAVD2023.EXE? PowerArchiver 2023 tries to open it.
But it seems, it tries to download PAVD2021.EXE.
Thanks
I noticed that the version of ZPAQ used is older than the latest released 7.15 https://mattmahoney.net/dc/zpaq.html also there seems to be a newer fork that adds several features https://github.com/fcorbelli/zpaqfranz
It would be useful to implement this latest version (it also maintains the same syntax and behavior as the latest official release if used the -715 flag) and add when opening a zpaq file a choice of the version of the files to show (e.g. as dummy folders represented the various versions present). Since any previous changes are stored with this format, it is possible to extract a snapshot of a certain date/version.
If I open a password-protected zipper file (created with WinRAR but I think that’s irrelevant), open it with PowerArchiver and run “Remove Encryption” on the same file, then reopen it and add a password with “Encrypt Archive,” the resulting archive will be protected with the old ZipCrypto algorithm and not AES as indicated.
(this can be verified, for example, by trying to open the archive files with Windows Explorer, which does not support the AES algorithm)
PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
Discovered:
a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files.
PowerArchiver 2012 - Context based Preview tab…Pretty!
-
Preview tab that is context based (if PA supports preview for that extension, Preview tab will show up) - how do you like it? Looks pretty :-).
-
Implement now please…:D
I thought I’d insist before Richard does…:DWindows 10 Pro x64
Intel Core i5 3470 @ 3.20GHz
8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3 -
Implement now please…:D
I thought I’d insist before Richard does…:DNicely done Moles. :D
I like it too, that’s two good things that have been revealed this week. :)
-
Who needs a new kitchen?
Windows 11 Pro ENU x64
Intel Core I7
32 GB RAM -
Err…
What a “PowerArchiver Gzip file” - no need for TAR any more?? -
Err…
What a “PowerArchiver Gzip file” - no need for TAR any more??just an website backup… GZ is still one file max format :)
-
-
Implement now please…:D
I thought I’d insist before Richard does…:Dit works but it is buggy right now… has delayed PA 2012 Beta actually :P
-
it works but it is buggy right now… has delayed PA 2012 Beta actually :P
Looks nice! and far better than the way we would preview pics now.
And i am sure i posted a while back about wanting a better preview tab and a developers tab for users who want to customise the interface more.
Could we alphas have a feel for it? or are these bugs really that bad?
Because i want it now! :D
So does moles and luxor -
whatever changes we made to incorporate tabs, it all crashes all the time now, so no :-)
-
whatever changes we made to incorporate tabs, it all crashes all the time now, so no :-)
ROFL! Erm dam! well look just stop and make my developer tab with Preview being a feature within that.
That way you kill two birds with one stone… and I get what i want x2!
:D
Im sure it will work great! Hows things going on the PAF front??
-
PAF: doing something else that using parts of PAF. Related to AC… will see soon :-)
-
just an website backup… GZ is still one file max format :)
PA compression of single file :confused:
http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4941 -
PA compression of single file :confused:
http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4941it wasnt compressed by PA, some gzip on unix :-)
-
PAF: doing something else that using parts of PAF. Related to AC… will see soon :-)
So does that mean you are pulling out of a new compression format for example to compress with .paf and not zip?
Or are you just adapting it for something else to buy you more time and test it in multiple situations?
-
@Sir:
So does that mean you are pulling out of a new compression format for example to compress with .paf and not zip?
Or are you just adapting it for something else to buy you more time and test it in multiple situations?
something else that uses parts of paf… still a lot of work left with paf, this way we get another product and develop paf at the same time.
-
Thought as much, something i would have adapted if i felt confident in its framework but wanted more time to develop the core further.
Well, i am looking forward to the next build… whenever that will be? ;)
-
@Sir:
Thought as much, something i would have adapted if i felt confident in its framework but wanted more time to develop the core further.
Well, i am looking forward to the next build… whenever that will be? ;)
in few days… paf simply requires a lot of specific codecs, we have done general one, we are almost done with pdf/png/zip recompressor, next is jpeg and then parts of paf.
If we work only on paf it would be done in 6-7 months… but we are not working only on paf, we promised some things last year and it is coming soon :-)
