Recent Topics
-
UNSOLVED PowerArchiver resend codes doesn't work
Tech Support5 -
UNSOLVED extracting issue
Tech Support1 -
UNSOLVED No Updates Shown
Tech Support4 -
PowerArchiver and PACL for macOS
Tech Support3 -
UNSOLVED File Browser: Operations don't trigger UAC
Tech Support7 -
Fast Ring: PowerArchiver 2019 19.00.51/54/57/58/59
Tech Support24 -
SOLVED Problem: Backspace navigation in Explorer mode
Tech Support3 -
UNSOLVED Smart AI: Preferences not intuitive
Tech Support13 -
SOLVED Find file in archive.
Wishlist9 -
UNSOLVED PA 20.00.02 not executing .exe files from archive
Tech Support10 -
PACL 9.0 Beta 2
Tech Support24 -
UNSOLVED Minor UI question
Tech Support7 -
SOLVED Slow Download
General Chat3 -
SOLVED ZIPX-jpeg-compression
Tech Support2 -
SOLVED PA standard 2019 can not create PA-archives
Tech Support2 -
UNSOLVED The PACL does not extract files from the self-extracting archive
Tech Support3 -
UNSOLVED PA 19.00.57 - Drawing issue on file type collumn
Tech Support2 -
UNSOLVED PA 19.00.57 crashes Firefox 69.0.1 in module pashlext64.dll | UserCallWinProcCheckWow
Tech Support18 -
UNSOLVED Include all PowerArchive Toolbox features in the offline installer
Tech Support3 -
UNSOLVED PA 2019 explorer preview window always blank
Tech Support3
PowerArchiver 2012 - Context based Preview tab…Pretty!
-
Preview tab that is context based (if PA supports preview for that extension, Preview tab will show up) - how do you like it? Looks pretty :-).
-
Implement now please…:D
I thought I’d insist before Richard does…:D
-
Implement now please…:D
I thought I’d insist before Richard does…:DNicely done Moles.
I like it too, that’s two good things that have been revealed this week.
-
Who needs a new kitchen?
-
Err…
What a “PowerArchiver Gzip file” - no need for TAR any more??
-
Err…
What a “PowerArchiver Gzip file” - no need for TAR any more??just an website backup… GZ is still one file max format
-
-
Implement now please…:D
I thought I’d insist before Richard does…:Dit works but it is buggy right now… has delayed PA 2012 Beta actually
-
it works but it is buggy right now… has delayed PA 2012 Beta actually
Looks nice! and far better than the way we would preview pics now.
And i am sure i posted a while back about wanting a better preview tab and a developers tab for users who want to customise the interface more.
Could we alphas have a feel for it? or are these bugs really that bad?
Because i want it now!
So does moles and luxor
-
whatever changes we made to incorporate tabs, it all crashes all the time now, so no
-
whatever changes we made to incorporate tabs, it all crashes all the time now, so no
ROFL! Erm dam! well look just stop and make my developer tab with Preview being a feature within that.
That way you kill two birds with one stone… and I get what i want x2!
Im sure it will work great! Hows things going on the PAF front??
-
PAF: doing something else that using parts of PAF. Related to AC… will see soon
-
just an website backup… GZ is still one file max format
PA compression of single file
http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4941
-
PA compression of single file
http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4941it wasnt compressed by PA, some gzip on unix
-
PAF: doing something else that using parts of PAF. Related to AC… will see soon
So does that mean you are pulling out of a new compression format for example to compress with .paf and not zip?
Or are you just adapting it for something else to buy you more time and test it in multiple situations?
-
@Sir:
So does that mean you are pulling out of a new compression format for example to compress with .paf and not zip?
Or are you just adapting it for something else to buy you more time and test it in multiple situations?
something else that uses parts of paf… still a lot of work left with paf, this way we get another product and develop paf at the same time.
-
Thought as much, something i would have adapted if i felt confident in its framework but wanted more time to develop the core further.
Well, i am looking forward to the next build… whenever that will be?
-
@Sir:
Thought as much, something i would have adapted if i felt confident in its framework but wanted more time to develop the core further.
Well, i am looking forward to the next build… whenever that will be?
in few days… paf simply requires a lot of specific codecs, we have done general one, we are almost done with pdf/png/zip recompressor, next is jpeg and then parts of paf.
If we work only on paf it would be done in 6-7 months… but we are not working only on paf, we promised some things last year and it is coming soon