• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Missing Icons
    LuxorL

    Just tried using the Modern (Windows 10) Icon set and seeing a few missing icons in both PowerArchiver Burner and PowerArchiver Encryption screens . They are all there in the Minimalistik icon set and the only difference I can see is the former is blue and the latter grey. In version 22.00.9

    powerarc_2023-09-18_17-00-19.png

    powerarc_2023-09-18_17-01-05.png

    Tech Support
    Security vulnerabilities in 7zip / Update for PowerArchiver and PACL libraries?
    BigMikeB

    Hi there,

    there were some security issues fixed in 7zip:
    https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1165/
    https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1164/

    As it seems, that PowerArchiver and PACL use the 7zip libraries, could you please update them to the latest version?

    Tech Support
    Virtual Drive
    E

    Hi,

    From where I get PAVD2023.EXE? PowerArchiver 2023 tries to open it.
    But it seems, it tries to download PAVD2021.EXE.

    Thanks

    Tech Support
    Better ZPAQ support
    W

    I noticed that the version of ZPAQ used is older than the latest released 7.15 https://mattmahoney.net/dc/zpaq.html also there seems to be a newer fork that adds several features https://github.com/fcorbelli/zpaqfranz

    It would be useful to implement this latest version (it also maintains the same syntax and behavior as the latest official release if used the -715 flag) and add when opening a zpaq file a choice of the version of the files to show (e.g. as dummy folders represented the various versions present). Since any previous changes are stored with this format, it is possible to extract a snapshot of a certain date/version.

    Tech Support
    Bug with "Encrypt Archive" action
    W

    If I open a password-protected zipper file (created with WinRAR but I think that’s irrelevant), open it with PowerArchiver and run “Remove Encryption” on the same file, then reopen it and add a password with “Encrypt Archive,” the resulting archive will be protected with the old ZipCrypto algorithm and not AES as indicated.
    (this can be verified, for example, by trying to open the archive files with Windows Explorer, which does not support the AES algorithm)

    Tech Support
    PA 21.00.18 Action / Test behaves oddly for me on .PA files
    Brian GregoryB

    PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
    I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
    Discovered:
    a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
    b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files.

    Tech Support

    PowerArchiver 2010 update

    Tech Support
    6
    8
    5659
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      Keith Weisshar
      last edited by

      I updated PowerArchiver 2010 via webupdate and it went from 11.61.06 to 11.61.07, why not 11.61.08. In the uninstall list of Program and Features in Windows 7 it shows Product Version 11.61.08 but when I click About PowerArchiver from the help menu it shows 11.61.07. Can you please fix this error. The POWERARC.EXE file is 11.6.1.7 with a file date of 12/2/2009.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • drteethD
        drteeth
        last edited by

        FYI - the link in the twitter for this version leads to v11.61.07.

        Cheers

        DrT

        moles42M G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • moles42M
          moles42 Alpha Testers @drteeth
          last edited by

          what I find amazing is that a warez site had this version posted 5 hours before I even received a ‘twitter’ notification…go figure! (and a serial was provided) :(

          I report the serials but they are still out there…:(

          Windows 10 Pro x64
          Intel Core i5 3470 @ 3.20GHz
          8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3

          spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G
            gate1975mlm @drteeth
            last edited by

            I downloaded and installed the latest PowerArchiver freom this web site which is v11.61.07 but then I clicked on check for update and it find v11.61.08.

            So what is going on?

            moles42M spwolfS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • moles42M
              moles42 Alpha Testers @gate1975mlm
              last edited by

              I find no v11.61.08 in any of the downloads whether it be from the official download link on the front page or via the programs update.
              I only see v11.61.07…methinks it’s just a slight hiccup…:)

              Windows 10 Pro x64
              Intel Core i5 3470 @ 3.20GHz
              8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3

              LuxorL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • LuxorL
                Luxor Alpha Testers @moles42
                last edited by

                @moles42:

                I only see v11.61.07…methinks it’s just a slight hiccup…:)

                Same here though I downloaded it 3 times before I came to that conclusion. :p

                Windows 10 Home 64-bit
                Intel Core i7 6700HQ @ 2.60GHz
                12.0GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 798MHz

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • spwolfS
                  spwolf conexware @gate1975mlm
                  last edited by

                  fixed… i am left without laptop for one night and hell comes loose ;-)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • spwolfS
                    spwolf conexware @moles42
                    last edited by

                    @moles42:

                    what I find amazing is that a warez site had this version posted 5 hours before I even received a ‘twitter’ notification…go figure! (and a serial was provided) :(

                    I report the serials but they are still out there…:(

                    send them again… interesting. We were testing it before release of course.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post