• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Website ideas
    D davidsplash
    I do like the new website though I would like to have support tap to include in its menu the community forums. As at first I thought you got rid of them until I accidently went to bottom of support form page. It would be nice to have a menu for approved plugins for powerarchiver. I would be willing to test them for you.
    Tech Support
    1 Posts
    0 Votes
    Open source
    D davidsplash
    Could powerarchiver be open sourced as I fear it is going to be lost once you decide to stop development on it.
    Tech Support
    2 Posts
    0 Votes
    BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.10.02
    spwolfS spwolf
    New version: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.10.02: Download: https://u.powerarchiver.com/pa2023/powarc221002.exe New build with new signature so shell extensions in Windows will function properly. Thanks everyone for your assistance!
    Tech Support
    7 Posts
    1 Votes
    Missing Icons
    LuxorL Luxor
    Just tried using the Modern (Windows 10) Icon set and seeing a few missing icons in both PowerArchiver Burner and PowerArchiver Encryption screens . They are all there in the Minimalistik icon set and the only difference I can see is the former is blue and the latter grey. In version 22.00.9 [image: 1695053428163-powerarc_2023-09-18_17-00-19.png] [image: 1695053445119-powerarc_2023-09-18_17-01-05.png]
    Tech Support
    10 Posts
    0 Votes
    Missing or ugly SFX-Icon
    MerowingerM Merowinger
    When I create a SFX-file from a zip (not from a 7-Zip) it happens that there is no icon for the file or a really ugly, pixelated icon. [image: 1563693941255-unbenannt-1.jpg]
    Tech Support
    6 Posts
    1 Votes
    End of Powerarchiver
    D davidsplash
    Powerarchiver is dead no updates to fix bugs no new features, no communication and errors in program update system with scripting errors. Duplicate context menus windows 11 no fixes no updates I declare that this is the last version.
    Tech Support
    8 Posts
    -1 Votes
    Windows 11 Shell Extension crash
    W wilsonp
    Copied the Take Command shortcut, changed Target to be wt.exe -p “Take Command” and saved it. Right-clicked to get to properties and Explorer crashed. (wt.exe is the Microsoft Terminal program, which I have installed from the Microsoft Store.) The Target path had changed to: C:\Users{username}\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps\wt.exe -p “Take Command” Created a new shortcut in a Start Menu folder and set the command line to the same, and it crashed the same. Created a new shortcut and set the command line to mspaint.exe (also a Windows Store app) and Explorer crashed on right-click on the shortcut. It appears PowerArchiver shell extensions doesn’t handle Windows Store apps in shortcuts properly. Perhaps it needs better defensive coding around checking the Target of shortcuts, or just ignoring shortcuts altogether. Running PA 22.00.11 on Windows 11 24H2 Build 26100.6584
    Tech Support
    1 Posts
    0 Votes
    Affected by winrar/.rar vulnerability?
    C cmmpc
    Was Power Archiver affected by the WinRAR/.rar vulnerability discovered by ESET researchers recently? Not sure if PA is using their libraries for extraction.
    Tech Support
    3 Posts
    0 Votes
    updates
    D davidsplash
    anything planned for the future or is this software just dead now?
    Tech Support
    6 Posts
    0 Votes
    Ultimate zip was made by powerarchiver
    D davidsplash
    From google search AI Overview Yes, that’s correct. UltimateZip was indeed a product of the same company that developed PowerArchiver, and it was essentially a rebranded version of PowerArchiver. It was discontinued and replaced by PowerArchiver.
    Tech Support
    1 Posts
    0 Votes
    News/Update on PowerArchiver/Connexion in 2024
    TheAndyMacT TheAndyMac
    Hi everyone, some good news about PowerArchiver… I’ve managed to get in touch with the original developer of PowerArchiver, Ivan Petrovic, and he has confirmed that the product is not dead or abandoned, in fact it is still very much alive! There has been a hiatus over the past months for various reasons, but that we should expect to see stuff coming through in the coming months (hopefully the next 2 months).
    Tech Support
    7 Posts
    5 Votes
    BETA PowerArchive 22.00.11 - Windows 11 Context Menu duplicated/additional tier
    TheAndyMacT TheAndyMac
    The Windows 11 context menu for PowerArchiver on normal files (to be compressed, etc.) is now showing multiple tiers with two identical menus. See attached captures of the issue: [image: 1736325038084-screenshot-2025-01-08-082909.png] [image: 1736325038147-screenshot-2025-01-08-082935.png] [image: 1736325038176-screenshot-2025-01-08-082953.png] Edition Windows 11 Pro Version 24H2 OS build 26100.2605
    Tech Support
    2 Posts
    0 Votes
    No Icons for SFX-Archives
    MerowingerM Merowinger
    Hello! I’ve just created SFX-Archives both from ZIP and 7z-Archives and none has an Icon as it seems. I use the new version 22.00.11. [image: 1729594955632-zwischenablage_10-22-2024_01.jpg]
    Tech Support
    6 Posts
    0 Votes
    Zip extraction from windows 11 by windows
    D davidsplash
    Basically I used powerarchiver context menus to zip up a folder then i used windows 11 own built in zip extractor via the context menu to extract all and this is where it throw up a fault. , I’m using windows 11 . The file that was a problem in the zip that windows 11 could not extract was iva “babe” cotton.jpg I know it has non standard quotes in it. However I had winrar on the computer and tried the exact same method with their context menu compress to zip and then I extracted the file with windows own extract all context menu and it had no problems. This indicates that powerarchiver is doing something different with iva “babe” cotton.jpg compressing to zip. Then I changed iva “babe” cotton.jpg to iva babe cotton.jpg and compressed it with powerarchiver and then tried it with windows 11 extract all and had no problems. It looks like powerarchiver is doing something to that one file that has quotes in it. Please note that powerarchiver extracted both zip files with no problems, only windows built in zip extraction had the fault. Reason I’m letting people know in case they send zip files with special characters in files names to people who do not have powerarchiver. When will a fix be implemented?
    Tech Support
    1 Posts
    1 Votes
    Installer problem
    L lxworld
    On installing the program I am getting the error message: "Unable to execute file c:\Program Files\PowerArchiver\pashutil.exe CreateProcess failed: code 2 The system cannot find the file specified" This can’t be right! I am using the latest official build of Windows 11
    Tech Support
    3 Posts
    0 Votes
    Button alignment. About window.
    LuxorL Luxor
    Buttons are not properly aligned on About screen. [image: 1726996285086-about-window.png]
    Tech Support
    2 Posts
    1 Votes
    Button alignment on config window.
    LuxorL Luxor
    Buttons not aligned on configuration window. [image: 1726914596335-configbuttons.png]
    Tech Support
    2 Posts
    1 Votes
    BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.10
    spwolfS spwolf
    New version: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.10: Download: https://u.powerarchiver.com/pa2023/powarc220010.exe New build for some bug fixes and issues - full list to come with new update. Please test and see if you have any issues. Thanks everyone for your assistance!
    Tech Support
    2 Posts
    0 Votes
    BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.11
    spwolfS spwolf
    New version: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.11: Download: https://u.powerarchiver.com/pa2023/powarc220011.exe New build for some bug fixes and issues - full list to come with new update. Please test and see if you have any issues. Thanks everyone for your assistance!
    Tech Support
    1 Posts
    1 Votes
    THE SSL CERTIFICATE FOR *.POWERARCHIVER.COM HAS EXPIRED.
    Brian GregoryB Brian Gregory
    @spwolf @Mili THE SSL CERTIFICATE FOR *.POWERARCHIVER.COM HAS EXPIRED.
    Tech Support
    2 Posts
    0 Votes

    PA Comparison with WinZip is unfair

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Tech Support
    11 Posts 5 Posters 13.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D Offline
      deipotent
      last edited by

      On the main PA web page you claim

      “Create unlimited sized ZIP files with fast and strong compression that outperforms WinZip.”

      While this is probably true, and PA does create slightly smaller ZIP archives. WinZip has a crucial advantage over PA in that it automatically detects if the archive will be bigger than 4GB or contain over 65535 files. This is why the ZIP archives are slightly bigger.

      PA has to have this option set by the user before the archive is created.

      Don’t get me wrong, I prefer PA and it is my main archiver, but I think PA should also have this feature.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K Offline
        klumy
        last edited by

        I support this wish ;)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • spwolfS Offline
          spwolf conexware
          last edited by

          Hi,

          PowerArchiver has an option “Make large ZIP archive”, which will automatically detect if you need to use 4.5 spec format for large archives. If you check this option, and create smaller file than 4 GB- PowerArchiver will correctly detect that you do not need PkWare 4.5 format and will use 2.0 format instead.

          That has nothing to do with compression size, they both store same header info, PowerArchiver just creates smaller archives…

          thanks for the thought…

          D A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D Offline
            deipotent @spwolf
            last edited by

            Why bother having this option in the first place then ? There’s no point.

            You might as well enable this option by default, and remove the option from the GUI. Insted you could replace it with an option “Notify if Zip64 archive created” which, if enabled, would display a message telling the user that “…a Zip64 archive was created. This will only be compatible with other applications that support the Zip64 standard.”

            spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A Offline
              awo @spwolf
              last edited by

              @spwolf:

              PowerArchiver has an option “Make large ZIP archive”, which will automatically detect if you need to use 4.5 spec format for large archives. If you check this option, and create smaller file than 4 GB- PowerArchiver will correctly detect that you do not need PkWare 4.5 format and will use 2.0 format instead.

              But in this thread, you wrote: “Flag makes PA create archives in PkZip 4.5 format, and a lot of other archives can not read files create with 4.5 format…”. Isn’t that a contradiction? :confused:

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • spwolfS Offline
                spwolf conexware @deipotent
                last edited by

                @deipotent:

                Why bother having this option in the first place then ? There’s no point.

                You might as well enable this option by default, and remove the option from the GUI. Insted you could replace it with an option “Notify if Zip64 archive created” which, if enabled, would display a message telling the user that “…a Zip64 archive was created. This will only be compatible with other applications that support the Zip64 standard.”

                Option was originally made long time ago - when nobody but PA and PkWare had support for creating large archives, so most likely by creating this kind of archive you would not be able to share it with anyone.

                We were already planning to remove it from PA 2005 since by now there are enough programs that support PkWare 4.5 to make it redundant.

                thanks!

                D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D Offline
                  deipotent @spwolf
                  last edited by

                  I still don’t fully understand because in your original reply you said that PA would use 2.0 format when possible, only using the new 4.5 standard (ie. Zip64) when the resultant archive would be larger than 4GB or it contained more than 65535 files in it.

                  If this is the case, then there was never really a need for this option in the first place.

                  From a previous post by you a while back, you said that if this option was not enabled and you tried to create an archive greater than 4GB or with more than 65535 files, it would create a broken archive.

                  I’m confused……

                  Does PA automatically detect if 4.5 standard should be used, or not ?

                  TBGBeT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • TBGBeT Offline
                    TBGBe @deipotent
                    last edited by

                    With the flag NOT checked, PA uses 2.0 format and does not check if this results in an invalid archive.

                    With the flag checked, PA uses 2.0 format unless Archive would be greater than 4GB - in which case it uses 4.5 format. Checking the number of files 65535 is easy to understand.

                    Just wondering, without performing the compression first - how does PA “guess” the (not yet) generated Archive size ? Presumably this also depends on the actual compression options : maximum, normal, store etc.

                    D spwolfS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D Offline
                      deipotent @TBGBe
                      last edited by

                      @TBGBe:

                      With the flag NOT checked, PA uses 2.0 format and does not check if this results in an invalid archive.

                      With the flag checked, PA uses 2.0 format unless Archive would be greater than 4GB - in which case it uses 4.5 format. Checking the number of files 65535 is easy to understand.

                      Just wondering, without performing the compression first - how does PA “guess” the (not yet) generated Archive size ? Presumably this also depends on the actual compression options : maximum, normal, store etc.

                      Now I get it. Has someone checked that PA automatically creates a 4.5 format archive with an archive that ends up larger than 4GB but has less than 65535 files ?

                      spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • spwolfS Offline
                        spwolf conexware @TBGBe
                        last edited by

                        I personally dont have technical knowledge of how does our zip component do that - originally we were not too trusty if it will actually correctly work (if it will be able to correctly guess which format to use) but after few years of using it - it works fine. Without looking at ZIP header/central directory info, I would guess it is done “on the fly” - since header information is different for each file.

                        So if you leave “Make large zip archive” checked, PowerArchiver will automatically detect if 4.5 format needs to be used or not. It might seem as if option is not needed anymore, but again - at the time we introduced it, it was needed or at least we thought it was so.

                        In any case, you are safe to leave it checked and it will work perfectly fine.

                        thanks,

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • spwolfS Offline
                          spwolf conexware @deipotent
                          last edited by

                          @deipotent:

                          Now I get it. Has someone checked that PA automatically creates a 4.5 format archive with an archive that ends up larger than 4GB but has less than 65535 files ?

                          Yep, it has been working fine for 2.5 years now. As mentioned above, I think it is done on the fly so once treshold is reached, 4.5 format is used.

                          thanks,

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post