Just tried using the Modern (Windows 10) Icon set and seeing a few missing icons in both PowerArchiver Burner and PowerArchiver Encryption screens . They are all there in the Minimalistik icon set and the only difference I can see is the former is blue and the latter grey. In version 22.00.9
powerarc_2023-09-18_17-00-19.png
powerarc_2023-09-18_17-01-05.png
Hi there,
there were some security issues fixed in 7zip:
https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1165/
https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1164/
As it seems, that PowerArchiver and PACL use the 7zip libraries, could you please update them to the latest version?
Hi,
From where I get PAVD2023.EXE? PowerArchiver 2023 tries to open it.
But it seems, it tries to download PAVD2021.EXE.
Thanks
I noticed that the version of ZPAQ used is older than the latest released 7.15 https://mattmahoney.net/dc/zpaq.html also there seems to be a newer fork that adds several features https://github.com/fcorbelli/zpaqfranz
It would be useful to implement this latest version (it also maintains the same syntax and behavior as the latest official release if used the -715 flag) and add when opening a zpaq file a choice of the version of the files to show (e.g. as dummy folders represented the various versions present). Since any previous changes are stored with this format, it is possible to extract a snapshot of a certain date/version.
If I open a password-protected zipper file (created with WinRAR but I think that’s irrelevant), open it with PowerArchiver and run “Remove Encryption” on the same file, then reopen it and add a password with “Encrypt Archive,” the resulting archive will be protected with the old ZipCrypto algorithm and not AES as indicated.
(this can be verified, for example, by trying to open the archive files with Windows Explorer, which does not support the AES algorithm)
PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
Discovered:
a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files.
Shell ext. - Seperator?
-
The shell ext shows a seperator? I guess this is not correct?
See image
-
is that 64bit shell or? weird.
-
nope. 32bit XP
Windows 11 Pro ENU x64
Intel Core I7
32 GB RAM -
I thought the separators were deliberate :confused:
To separate PA “sub-menu” from other context menu items (note there is one above and below the “sub-menu”). -
can you send me your PA reg file? so I can try to reproduce it…
Terry - unknown to me, even if true :-). But I dont see that on my computer.
Now it could be due to installing over older installations as I often clean my PA registry due to testing…
-
It can also be from some other Windows utility or application since you can even put a separator between some items created with some other application. I cannot also reproduce.
-
Terry - unknown to me, even if true :-). But I dont see that on my computer.
Really - I’ve always had it as far as I can remember. I actually like it and wouldn’t want to lose it - it works for me as I put all PA commands into the sub-menu :p
-
Really - I’ve always had it as far as I can remember. I actually like it and wouldn’t want to lose it - it works for me as I put all PA commands into the sub-menu :p
:-)
-
I actually like it and wouldn’t want to lose it - it works for me as I put all PA commands into the sub-menu :p
+1… I’ve been putting all the sub-items in there as well.
-
And you also have the separators :)
-
you should have separators between PA options and other options, but not one between PA options, thats the difference…
-
… not one between PA options, thats the difference…
Oh thanks - that explains it then (to me).
Learn something new every day :o
-
fixed
