• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Missing Icons
    LuxorL
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.10.02
    spwolfS
    New version: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.10.02: Download: https://u.powerarchiver.com/pa2023/powarc221002.exe New build with new signature so shell extensions in Windows will function properly. Thanks everyone for your assistance!
    Tech Support
    Missing or ugly SFX-Icon
    MerowingerM
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    End of Powerarchiver
    D
    Powerarchiver is dead no updates to fix bugs no new features, no communication and errors in program update system with scripting errors. Duplicate context menus windows 11 no fixes no updates I declare that this is the last version.
    Tech Support
    Windows 11 Shell Extension crash
    W
    Copied the Take Command shortcut, changed Target to be wt.exe -p “Take Command” and saved it. Right-clicked to get to properties and Explorer crashed. (wt.exe is the Microsoft Terminal program, which I have installed from the Microsoft Store.) The Target path had changed to: C:\Users{username}\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps\wt.exe -p “Take Command” Created a new shortcut in a Start Menu folder and set the command line to the same, and it crashed the same. Created a new shortcut and set the command line to mspaint.exe (also a Windows Store app) and Explorer crashed on right-click on the shortcut. It appears PowerArchiver shell extensions doesn’t handle Windows Store apps in shortcuts properly. Perhaps it needs better defensive coding around checking the Target of shortcuts, or just ignoring shortcuts altogether. Running PA 22.00.11 on Windows 11 24H2 Build 26100.6584
    Tech Support
    Affected by winrar/.rar vulnerability?
    C
    Was Power Archiver affected by the WinRAR/.rar vulnerability discovered by ESET researchers recently? Not sure if PA is using their libraries for extraction.
    Tech Support
    updates
    D
    anything planned for the future or is this software just dead now?
    Tech Support
    Ultimate zip was made by powerarchiver
    D
    From google search AI Overview Yes, that’s correct. UltimateZip was indeed a product of the same company that developed PowerArchiver, and it was essentially a rebranded version of PowerArchiver. It was discontinued and replaced by PowerArchiver.
    Tech Support
    News/Update on PowerArchiver/Connexion in 2024
    TheAndyMacT
    Hi everyone, some good news about PowerArchiver… I’ve managed to get in touch with the original developer of PowerArchiver, Ivan Petrovic, and he has confirmed that the product is not dead or abandoned, in fact it is still very much alive! There has been a hiatus over the past months for various reasons, but that we should expect to see stuff coming through in the coming months (hopefully the next 2 months).
    Tech Support
    BETA PowerArchive 22.00.11 - Windows 11 Context Menu duplicated/additional tier
    TheAndyMacT
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    No Icons for SFX-Archives
    MerowingerM
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    Zip extraction from windows 11 by windows
    D
    Basically I used powerarchiver context menus to zip up a folder then i used windows 11 own built in zip extractor via the context menu to extract all and this is where it throw up a fault. , I’m using windows 11 . The file that was a problem in the zip that windows 11 could not extract was iva “babe” cotton.jpg I know it has non standard quotes in it. However I had winrar on the computer and tried the exact same method with their context menu compress to zip and then I extracted the file with windows own extract all context menu and it had no problems. This indicates that powerarchiver is doing something different with iva “babe” cotton.jpg compressing to zip. Then I changed iva “babe” cotton.jpg to iva babe cotton.jpg and compressed it with powerarchiver and then tried it with windows 11 extract all and had no problems. It looks like powerarchiver is doing something to that one file that has quotes in it. Please note that powerarchiver extracted both zip files with no problems, only windows built in zip extraction had the fault. Reason I’m letting people know in case they send zip files with special characters in files names to people who do not have powerarchiver. When will a fix be implemented?
    Tech Support
    Installer problem
    L
    On installing the program I am getting the error message: "Unable to execute file c:\Program Files\PowerArchiver\pashutil.exe CreateProcess failed: code 2 The system cannot find the file specified" This can’t be right! I am using the latest official build of Windows 11
    Tech Support
    Button alignment. About window.
    LuxorL
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    Button alignment on config window.
    LuxorL
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.10
    spwolfS
    New version: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.10: Download: https://u.powerarchiver.com/pa2023/powarc220010.exe New build for some bug fixes and issues - full list to come with new update. Please test and see if you have any issues. Thanks everyone for your assistance!
    Tech Support
    BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.11
    spwolfS
    New version: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.11: Download: https://u.powerarchiver.com/pa2023/powarc220011.exe New build for some bug fixes and issues - full list to come with new update. Please test and see if you have any issues. Thanks everyone for your assistance!
    Tech Support
    THE SSL CERTIFICATE FOR *.POWERARCHIVER.COM HAS EXPIRED.
    Brian GregoryB
    @spwolf @Mili THE SSL CERTIFICATE FOR *.POWERARCHIVER.COM HAS EXPIRED.
    Tech Support
    PA2023 22.00.09 trying to delete a directory from a tar file.
    Brian GregoryB
    I had a large .tar file (a backed up WSL) and I want to delete a few directories and their contents from it using PA2023. PA just destroys the whole archive as soon as I try to delete a directory, leaving it in a state where PA2023 won’t even open it any more. I tried several times and also tried compressing it to .tar.xz instead - same result. This should either actually work, or it should say operation not supported and do nothing.
    Tech Support
    PA 2023: No portable version?
    A
    Hello! The regular version of PA 2023 is out for over 6 months now, but there is still no sign of the portable release. (When) will there be one? Thanks!
    Tech Support

    How can they compress this strong?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Tech Support
    12 Posts 5 Posters 12.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • manuangiM Offline
      manuangi @ivan
      last edited by

      @ivan:

      Can you tried 7-ZIP format and Ultra compression with Solid option?

      yes, I did…that’s why I posted…

      the exe file you download is 1.881KB, if you decompress it then 7-zip it (with the options you said…which, anyway, are my standard), you get a 2.068KB-big archive…

      :confused:

      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S Offline
        Serhiy @manuangi
        last edited by

        [old image removed] (to save space)

        manuangiM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • manuangiM Offline
          manuangi @Serhiy
          last edited by

          btw…compressing to a CAB does slightly better…but always 2.037KB vs 1.881KB only

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • manuangiM Offline
            manuangi @Serhiy
            last edited by

            @NTFS:

            I can confirm this!

            See attached image…

            confirmed…as your image lets see, the exe is an SFX 7-Zip archive…

            they used 7-Zip…so, how come we can’t compress as strongly using 7Z within PA?

            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B Offline
              By-Tor @manuangi
              last edited by

              Confirmed here as well. They must have tweaked the compression options for 7-zip.

              spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • spwolfS Offline
                spwolf conexware @By-Tor
                last edited by

                @By-Tor:

                Confirmed here as well. They must have tweaked the compression options for 7-zip.

                Yes, you can use “stronger” 7zip compression which uses larger dictionary, however in most of the cases it will not lower the compression. PowerArchiver uses 32 MB dictionary with Ultra settings which will take up 400 MB of your RAM, 7zip allows the use of up to 192 MB of memory, taking up to 1.9 GB of RAM…

                I personally tested it with quite few things and never noticed anything but small difference with larger dictionaries than 32 MB…

                B manuangiM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B Offline
                  By-Tor @spwolf
                  last edited by

                  @spwolf:

                  I personally tested it with quite few things and never noticed anything but small difference with larger dictionaries than 32 MB…

                  This must be one of those cases where the dictionary size does make a difference. That’s why I put the request for more 7-Zip options in the wishlist. :)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • manuangiM Offline
                    manuangi @spwolf
                    last edited by

                    @spwolf:

                    Yes, you can use “stronger” 7zip compression which uses larger dictionary, however in most of the cases it will not lower the compression. PowerArchiver uses 32 MB dictionary with Ultra settings which will take up 400 MB of your RAM, 7zip allows the use of up to 192 MB of memory, taking up to 1.9 GB of RAM…

                    I personally tested it with quite few things and never noticed anything but small difference with larger dictionaries than 32 MB…

                    I think you should let your users decide about the amount of memory to set the dictionary to…as noticed, some times that does make a differencd in files final size.

                    I’ve got a testing pc with 4GB of RAM…so I might very well have 1.9GB of those taken for compressing… ;)

                    S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S Offline
                      Serhiy @manuangi
                      last edited by

                      @manuangi:

                      I think you should let your users decide about the amount of memory to set the dictionary to…as noticed, some times that does make a differencd in files final size.

                      I’ve got a testing pc with 4GB of RAM…so I might very well have 1.9GB of those taken for compressing… ;)

                      I don’t have “4GB of RAM” but I agree with you anyway. ;)

                      Thanks!

                      B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B Offline
                        By-Tor @Serhiy
                        last edited by

                        Good, then everyone is agreeable. :)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post