-
PA 2023 22.00.08
Long time no seeing. So I start up the new year with a first problem : the virtual driver cannot be installed. Reason : it is missing in the Fast Ring PatchBeam Update Service…
Virtual driver PA 2023-01-28 152607.png
It seems a standard problem with new releases :-)
Can I have a link or can it be fixed. Thank you. CU later -
When the function for testing archives is invoked via the shell context menu (PowerArchiver > Test) then all the files in the archive get extracted to the current folder.
The test dialog reports as many errors as there are files in the archive but it fails to give any hint as to which files are supposed to be erroneous or what the nature of the problem might be. Comparing the extracted files to the originals shows no differences at all.
The .7z in question was produced with maximised compression settings in 7zip (taking forever but resulting in smaller archives than .7z produced by PowerArchiver with maximised settings). Therefore I wanted to see whether PowerArchiver can at least test .7z that it produced itself. Hence I had PowerArchiver convert a .pa with the same contents to .7z. There weren’t any errors reported but the resulting .7z contained fewer than half of the files contained in the .pa (137 of 366), so I scratched that test.
Performance is abysmal when testing via the context menu (e.g. almost 2 minutes for testing a .7z that 7zip tests in 4 seconds), but that is most likely due to the fact that the extracted files are written to disk. Testing the same .7z in the PowerArchiver GUI takes only 8 seconds but causes the mysterious appearance of a UAC dialog, as reported elsewhere.
The testing function is vital because PowerArchiver has a history of producing archives that it cannot unpack without errors or that do not conform to the respective file format standards (e.g. ZIP) so that other programs report them as erroneous.
The point of creating archives is that the files in them will most likely have to be extracted at some point. If the extraction cannot be guaranteed to produce correct results then the whole program is absolutely pointless. Actually, worse than pointless - it causes data loss and hence damage.
-
In PowerArchiver 2023 22.00.06 configuration, the option labelled “Start PowerArchiver 2023 Starter when my computer starts” seems to be redundant.
I am only allowed to change this option when PA Starter is disabled, and then it seems to be ignored.
When I enable PA Starter this option is forced to the enabled state.
I think it’d be good to remove “Start PowerArchiver 2023 Starter when my computer starts” completely. I’ve always found it confusing having both options.
Added later: However i don’t particularly want to use queue but I do like having the PAStarter icon in my tray area.
-
W10 Pro 22H2 - 64 -bit
PA 22.00.06 (PA 2023)
It has been the case with previous versions of PowerArchiver, but I had hoped that the latest might behave differently. Not so, I’m afraid.
I have, for various obscure reasons, created a few .pa archives, mainly in the hope that they will save me some more space. From time to time, I use the “Test” option to check that important archives are OK and uncorrupted.
With every .pa archive I’ve tested, the process runs through OK but then reports that there are errors. This is always the number of files in the archive e.g. if 11 files, then 11 errors reported.
In the .pa, I can:-
preview the files (usually PDF) extract some or all files and look at or use them convert the .pa to a .zip or .zipx archive, which then works fine and tests without errorsIs it the case that the Test routine isn’t designed for .pa archives, or is there another reason? Although the .pa seems to function properly, despite the test reporting errors, I would like to be sure that every .pa is OK and not “broken”.
Some of the .pas are quite old and produced with earlier PA versions (they are truly “archives”). If I extract all the files in the old .pa, create a new, fresh .pa and add back the files to that, then test the new, no errors (at least in the .pa I’ve tried this on) are reported. This would suggest a mismatch between old .pas and newer versions of PA itself.
-
PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
Discovered:
a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files. -
Clipboard02.jpg
See the, supposedly, blank space where the green box is? It’s like that in Modern Light theme too. I can toggle it, but it’s missing text or shouldn’t be there I guess?
Thanks :)
-
Dear @Alpha-Testers and all of our users,
time has come for testing of PowerArchiver and PACL for macOS.
Please let us know here if you have Mac and can test latest builds.Features implemented:
PowerArchiver 2020 - tabbing, opening, extracting, adding, testing, favorite folders, support for multiple languages, opening via Finder, explorer mode, installer.
PACL 10 - support for most formats and features in Windows version.Upcoming: Tools such as archive converter, batch zip, multi-extract.
To start testing, please sign up here in this thread, and we will send you latest build.
thank you!
Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h54m56s_008_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m05s_009_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m14s_010_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m30s_011_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m39s_012_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h55m49s_013_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h56m00s_014_.png Ashampoo_Snap_Wednesday, November 20, 2019_12h54m43s_007_.png
76e97ab9-8d75-4175-9ce8-446500031f38-image.png
-
For some reason, the PowerArchiver functions in the Windows 11 context menu no longer work after the last Windows Update. Only the functions in the classic context menu function as they should.
I’ve tried uninstalling PowerArchiver and using RevoUninstaller to remove all bits and pieces that were left behind and did a clean install of PowerArchiver, it didn’t fix the issue. Other items in the Windows 11 context menu work.
PA2009 Backup Function Date Selection Error
-
I’m pretty sure this issue came up and was resolved a couple of years ago, but . . . .
Last night I ran my daily backup routines after just having upgraded to PA2009 and after checking my backup files I noticed that they got much bigger than previously. Obviously more files were now being included. I checked the backup routines (the .pbs files) and confirmed that my selection criteria of “newer than 30 days” had not changed during the upgrade process. However, checking the contents of my backup files revealed that files that had been modified MORE than 30 days ago were also included. However, not ALL files were included, so it was not effectively a full backup, but more like “newer than 70 days”.
I’m not sure if there is a connection, but I use the Canadian date format of day/month/year, but this is a Windows system setting and is application independend.
-
are you overwriting the backup file? or updating it? That might be the issue - PA will not delete old archive anymore, it will update it with new files.
-
After I read another thread (“PA Backup File” by Martin), that thought occurred to me as well, but looking at the dates of the files contained in the bakup file, that would not appear to be the case.
The backup job ran on Oct.2,2008 and was configured to select files “newer than” “30” days. Files found in the resulting ZIP file range in “modified” dates from Oct.2 to July 22. I think that is 71 days (perhaps that is significant somehow).
-
ah, newer… modified or created? there is an world of difference just there…
-
I’m not quite sure what you mean with your response spwolf.
Just to clarify, I have not changed my PBS files, just updated (uninstalled PA2007 and installed PA2009) the program. The “newer than” option and my “30” days setting are still the same as in PA2007 (1022). The resulting ZIP file shows the “modified” date column, just as before. So the “newer than” option has always applied to the modified date, not the created date.
Are you perhaps saying that in PA2009 the definition of “newer than” has changed?
-
Any more thoughts on this spwolf? Is this being investigated?
-
@Joe:
Any more thoughts on this spwolf? Is this being investigated?
fixed, waiting for release… :-)
-
please check with 11.01… thank you!
-
Well, the latest PA2009 updates have fixed the original bug, but today I’ve discovered another problem with the “newer than xx days” option.
It would seem that there is a fundamental error in the way the actual date is calculated. For instance, if I specify “newer than 30 days”, on the 30th day of the month the backup job will just sit there without doing anything. I suspect if I specify “newer than 1 day” the same problem will occur on every 1st day of each month.
I’ve changed my monthly backup jobs to a “newer than 32 days” selection criteria, to circumvent this bug, but I need a solution for my weekly jobs (where I specify “newer than 7 days”).
-
@Joe:
Well, the latest PA2009 updates have fixed the original bug, but today I’ve discovered another problem with the “newer than xx days” option.
It would seem that there is a fundamental error in the way the actual date is calculated. For instance, if I specify “newer than 30 days”, on the 30th day of the month the backup job will just sit there without doing anything. I suspect if I specify “newer than 1 day” the same problem will occur on every 1st day of each month.
I’ve changed my monthly backup jobs to a “newer than 32 days” selection criteria, to circumvent this bug, but I need a solution for my weekly jobs (where I specify “newer than 7 days”).
so backup will not run on certain date = if that date= amount of days you entered on newer than?
-
It sure looks that way…the pattern is obvious…(newer than) 30 (days) minus (Oct.) 30 (th) = 0, hence PA2009 launches, but just sits there and processes 0 (nothing).
I just tested another scenario and changed my system date to the 7th then ran a weekly backup (with “newer than 7 days”) and the same situation occurred again: PA2009 launches, but does nothing.
-
who da best support in the history of man kind?
http://www.powerarchiver.com/test/release10/powarc1102.exe:-)
-
p.s. let us know if it works properly… thanks