For example:
Download this ZIP file: http://dslstats.me.uk/files/dslstats32W-6.5.zip
Everything in the ZIP file is in a directory “dslstats32W-6.5”.
However when I extract using right click “Extract Here” the name of the directory created is “2W-6.5” !
I am running PA 22.00.09 on Windows 11. I have seen the same happen with some other kinds of archive too.
Hello!
Is there currently no portable version of PA2023 available?
(When) do you plan to release one?
Thanks!
If I compress a folder to a .pa using right click, Compress to folder.pa and use the new Windows 11 menu then the Options, Configuration, Miscellaneous, Use normal relative path setting is always enabled.
But I like this option disabled so I have to use the old style menu in order to get PA to compress a folder in the way I wish.
Just tried using the Modern (Windows 10) Icon set and seeing a few missing icons in both PowerArchiver Burner and PowerArchiver Encryption screens . They are all there in the Minimalistik icon set and the only difference I can see is the former is blue and the latter grey. In version 22.00.9
powerarc_2023-09-18_17-00-19.png
powerarc_2023-09-18_17-01-05.png
PA 22.00.09
344c6c52-f03f-407b-ad76-8130b31936bb-image.png
PA 22.00.09 shows a nag screen, when I try to open some setting windows. I have already PA 2023 Toolbox and PA shows, that it’s licensed in the info dialog.
a860bd81-3e71-4ce0-9988-74cd4189d43e-image.png
0836bc83-8046-4a91-bc7b-68bd231100a3-image.png
PA 22.00.09
Some labels in the help toolbar are not translated:
b3c1f5c4-b73d-49d8-9ed0-56294840838c-image.png
I’m looking forward to deploying PowerArchiver 2023 to my users. Can you tell us when the MSI will be available for download and distribution?
Thanks.
Hi there,
there were some security issues fixed in 7zip:
https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1165/
https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1164/
As it seems, that PowerArchiver and PACL use the 7zip libraries, could you please update them to the latest version?
Hi,
From where I get PAVD2023.EXE? PowerArchiver 2023 tries to open it.
But it seems, it tries to download PAVD2021.EXE.
Thanks
I noticed that the version of ZPAQ used is older than the latest released 7.15 https://mattmahoney.net/dc/zpaq.html also there seems to be a newer fork that adds several features https://github.com/fcorbelli/zpaqfranz
It would be useful to implement this latest version (it also maintains the same syntax and behavior as the latest official release if used the -715 flag) and add when opening a zpaq file a choice of the version of the files to show (e.g. as dummy folders represented the various versions present). Since any previous changes are stored with this format, it is possible to extract a snapshot of a certain date/version.
If I open a password-protected zipper file (created with WinRAR but I think that’s irrelevant), open it with PowerArchiver and run “Remove Encryption” on the same file, then reopen it and add a password with “Encrypt Archive,” the resulting archive will be protected with the old ZipCrypto algorithm and not AES as indicated.
(this can be verified, for example, by trying to open the archive files with Windows Explorer, which does not support the AES algorithm)
PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
Discovered:
a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files.
Extract to dir;PA can't handle;dir's created anyway
-
try to extract an exe file through the context menu, when PA shows you the “extract to” option…sometimes it’s a file PA can’t handle.
also in those cases, if you chose to extract into a folder, that folder will be created.
wouldn’t it be better for it to be deleted, as the extraction process failed so you surely will delete the new dir manually?
-
What happens if some files were extracted and some were not? Or if folder is already present and file doesnt work? Prefferably, we wont delete files or folders that we dont have to since that is just asking for some bug to kreep in and delete your files.
thanks,
-
What happens if some files were extracted and some were not? Or if folder is already present and file doesnt work? Prefferably, we wont delete files or folders that we dont have to since that is just asking for some bug to kreep in and delete your files.
thanks,
you’re sort of right, spwolf…yes, that would lead to problems if the dir was already present.
then…maybe a popup win saying “would you like to delete the dir XXX (which was just created)”?
what do you think?
-
I have fixed so now if folder was created by PowerArchiver and no files were extracted due broked archive (or unsupported SFX file) will be removed by PoweArchiver automatically.
-
I have fixed so now if folder was created by PowerArchiver and no files were extracted due broked archive (or unsupported SFX file) will be removed by PoweArchiver automatically.
you rock, man! thank you so much! :D
-
Hi,
here is the latest TEST version, 9.00.34 with fix for this bug. Please let us know if it fixes the issue and if you notice anything else at all. You can install this version over the last one and restart your computer.
Download TEST version 9.00.34:
http://www.powerarchiver.com/test/powarc90034.exethank you!
-
let me corrupt an archive with WinHex…and I’ll check! :cool:
-
let me corrupt an archive with WinHex…and I’ll check! :cool:
Bug gone…but not completely!
Gone, because PA now tells me at once that the file’s corrupted, and does not create any new dir! :D
WELL DONE!“not completely” because I have to click TWICE on “OK” to close PA warning messages, it seems two identic messages come out.
FYI, the “double click bug” was there in .33 as well…check it! ;)
-
What double click bug - it wasn’t something mentioned in this thread?
-
no, I had not mentioned it anywhere before…yet it’s related to the bug I opened this thread for.
when a corrupted file fails to extract, no folders are created, ok, problem solved.
but PA tells you TWICE that the file’s corrupted and can’t be extracted, and you have to click TWICE on “ok” to get rid of the warning message…I think you can reproduce that behaviour quite easily…let me know!
-
Still cannot reproduce double dialog. Can you please tell me exact message being shown and maybe send me smallest file you are having this problem with - since double dialog does not show on any corrupted archive.
-
download the following file:
http://user1.7host.com/maiuebsait/mix/corrupted.7z
uncompress and see the avi I created.here’s the corrupted zip file I used:
http://user1.7host.com/maiuebsait/mix/CorruptedArchive_TestPurpose.zipso…could you reproduce it now?
pls let me know!the problem persists with v9.01.01 as well!
-
@ivan: did you read my last message? what do you think?
-
Thanks!
I will check it.
-
with the pre-release 9.01.02 PA is back to the situation I reported at the beginning of this thread:
-if you try to extract the corrupted file via “extract here”, you’ll see the extraction windows complete its task but then nothing will be extracted.
-if you choose “extract to \filename” the filename dir will be created, empty
-if you open the archive in PA it will show you the name of the file inside, and if you try to extract or open it from there, you’ll be given the “unexpected end of zip file”, and you’ll have to click twice on the message window to get rid of it.
so, I have to say 9.01.01 was better…ok, you had to click twice on the message win as well, but at least it found out the archive was corrupted, and the message would always pop up!
-
with the latest 9.02.00, nothing has changed with regards to my previous post… :(
@dev’s: is it going to be fixed any shortly? thanks!
-
with the pre-release 9.01.02 PA is back to the situation I reported at the beginning of this thread:
-if you try to extract the corrupted file via “extract here”, you’ll see the extraction windows complete its task but then nothing will be extracted.
-if you choose “extract to \filename” the filename dir will be created, empty
-if you open the archive in PA it will show you the name of the file inside, and if you try to extract or open it from there, you’ll be given the “unexpected end of zip file”, and you’ll have to click twice on the message window to get rid of it.
so, I have to say 9.01.01 was better…ok, you had to click twice on the message win as well, but at least it found out the archive was corrupted, and the message would always pop up!
9.10.06: bug still there, unfortunately :(
W*nR** handles that properly, prompting about the archive being corrupted. -
9.10.06: bug still there, unfortunately :(
W*nR** handles that properly, prompting about the archive being corrupted.9.11.01: still no improvements about this bug…
-
-
I am sorry, we just want to make sure we give it a proper testing, which is what only 9.5 can do…
thank you and I promise 9.5 will fix it!
-
I am sorry, we just want to make sure we give it a proper testing, which is what only 9.5 can do…
thank you and I promise 9.5 will fix it!
ok, thank you! :)
-
I am sorry, we just want to make sure we give it a proper testing, which is what only 9.5 can do…
thank you and I promise 9.5 will fix it!
you are a man of your word! ;)
In 9.5b4 the problem is gone, now no empty dirs are created for corrupted archives anymore! :)