Multi-part RAR file bug 2010 b1
-
Hi,
Just come across this.
Double clicking on any part of the multi-part archive (.rar, .r01, .r02 etc) should open the acrchive.
However, I have to double click on the .rar file, trying it with any of the .r?? files brings up a Drag and drop box.
Cheers
DrT
-
The developers are aware of this and a fix is forthcoming.
ASUS Crosshair VII Hero
AMD Ryzen 9 5700X
T-Force DDR4 3600 32GB
Samsung 970 EVO 2TB
GTX 3080ti
Win10 x64 -
-
The developers are aware of this and a fix is forthcoming.
are we? :-)
it seems to work with part3.rar, etc in upcoming release…
-
are we? :-)
it seems to work with part3.rar, etc in upcoming release…
I don’t know how it is from a programming point of view, but could *.rar files be treated differently to *.r01, *.r02 etc?
Cheers
DrT
-
I don’t know how it is from a programming point of view, but could *.rar files be treated differently to *.r01, *.r02 etc?
Cheers
DrT
might be… i wrote it in to be sure…
-
might be… i wrote it in to be sure…
I have also had the same box appear when right-clicking on an EXE file (self extracting installer) and choosing ‘open with PowerArchiver’ (I do this quite often).
Cheers
DrT
Edit: The above was a 40MB file, just had it happen with a 2MB file (of a different format that I can ALWAYS examine…happy to send it to you if you wish - it’s legit from MSoft).
-
please check with official beta 1, and let us know if this has been fixed… thank you!
-
please check with official beta 1, and let us know if this has been fixed… thank you!
Can now open the MSoft file. Will check on a multi-part RAR file the next time I get one.
Have the previously reported graphical issues with the gray column headers under XP been noted by the developers? Looks okay under Vista (32-bit).
Cheers
DrT
-
Can now open the MSoft file. Will check on a multi-part RAR file the next time I get one.
Have the previously reported graphical issues with the gray column headers under XP been noted by the developers? Looks okay under Vista (32-bit).
Cheers
DrT
not if you reported it in wrong thread (not its own)… as you can see, with many reports in, it gets hectic, and if issue does not have its own thread, it will most likely be overlooked.
-
not if you reported it in wrong thread (not its own)… as you can see, with many reports in, it gets hectic, and if issue does not have its own thread, it will most likely be overlooked.
They were posted in ‘PA 2010 b1’ started 3/3/09, but not commented upon.
Cheers
DrT
-
They were posted in ‘PA 2010 b1’ started 3/3/09, but not commented upon.
Cheers
DrT
thats why they should be in separate thread… its very hard to find things when there are multiple things in thread called “pa 2010 b1”
-
thats why they should be in separate thread… its very hard to find things when there are multiple things in thread called “pa 2010 b1”
Will bear that in mind for future posts.
Would you like me to repost? I’m really not being funny by asking, I know you must be very busy…just trying to be helpful.
Cheers
DrT
-
rars work fine?
