PA 2009 is extremely slow
-
so its 5 seconds for loading PA and opening an zip file?
Yes. Double-clicking an archive. Even immediately reopening a file as small as 64 KB, which would have been cached both by the hard drive and by Windows, still takes at least 3 seconds (usually over 4 seconds) to load.
Doesn’t seem to be archive type dependent, because I’m getting the same lag for ZIP, XPI, and TAR.GZ
-
Yes. Double-clicking an archive. Even immediately reopening a file as small as 64 KB, which would have been cached both by the hard drive and by Windows, still takes at least 3 seconds (usually over 4 seconds) to load.
Doesn’t seem to be archive type dependent, because I’m getting the same lag for ZIP, XPI, and TAR.GZ
reopning as in opening from already open PA or again via doubleclick in windows explorer?
-
reopning as in opening from already open PA or again via doubleclick in windows explorer?
PA completely closed then I double-click the archive in Windows Explorer.
-
fastest PA will be is to use classic interface with classic view (no explorer view). And disabled splash screen.We will speed it up a bit by the final, but we are talking about several %.
PA 2007 is sometimes faster, sometimes slower to start than PA 2009 (depending on settings), and slower when compressing/extracting anytime.
-
Already tried all you mentioned (except the splashscreen thing, since I see no splahscreen). Still slow, but thanks.
-
there are some more optimizations for b4 - it should reduce load times for registered users around 30% in our testings…
-
there are some more optimizations for b4 - it should reduce load times for registered users around 30% in our testings…
Great news! Thanks.
-
please check with beta 4 now avail. through web update and let us know if this has been improved.
thanks!
-
better?
-
I noticed a slight change in speed. It opens just a bit faster. It closed much faster than before. With previous betas I could see the ribbbon collapsing item by item in a fast series of flickers. Thats been resolved.
