• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.10.02
    spwolfS
    New version: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.10.02: Download: https://u.powerarchiver.com/pa2023/powarc221002.exe New build with new signature so shell extensions in Windows will function properly. Thanks everyone for your assistance!
    Tech Support
    Missing Icons
    LuxorL
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    Missing or ugly SFX-Icon
    MerowingerM
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    End of Powerarchiver
    D
    Powerarchiver is dead no updates to fix bugs no new features, no communication and errors in program update system with scripting errors. Duplicate context menus windows 11 no fixes no updates I declare that this is the last version.
    Tech Support
    Windows 11 Shell Extension crash
    W
    Copied the Take Command shortcut, changed Target to be wt.exe -p “Take Command” and saved it. Right-clicked to get to properties and Explorer crashed. (wt.exe is the Microsoft Terminal program, which I have installed from the Microsoft Store.) The Target path had changed to: C:\Users{username}\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps\wt.exe -p “Take Command” Created a new shortcut in a Start Menu folder and set the command line to the same, and it crashed the same. Created a new shortcut and set the command line to mspaint.exe (also a Windows Store app) and Explorer crashed on right-click on the shortcut. It appears PowerArchiver shell extensions doesn’t handle Windows Store apps in shortcuts properly. Perhaps it needs better defensive coding around checking the Target of shortcuts, or just ignoring shortcuts altogether. Running PA 22.00.11 on Windows 11 24H2 Build 26100.6584
    Tech Support
    Affected by winrar/.rar vulnerability?
    C
    Was Power Archiver affected by the WinRAR/.rar vulnerability discovered by ESET researchers recently? Not sure if PA is using their libraries for extraction.
    Tech Support
    updates
    D
    anything planned for the future or is this software just dead now?
    Tech Support
    Ultimate zip was made by powerarchiver
    D
    From google search AI Overview Yes, that’s correct. UltimateZip was indeed a product of the same company that developed PowerArchiver, and it was essentially a rebranded version of PowerArchiver. It was discontinued and replaced by PowerArchiver.
    Tech Support
    News/Update on PowerArchiver/Connexion in 2024
    TheAndyMacT
    Hi everyone, some good news about PowerArchiver… I’ve managed to get in touch with the original developer of PowerArchiver, Ivan Petrovic, and he has confirmed that the product is not dead or abandoned, in fact it is still very much alive! There has been a hiatus over the past months for various reasons, but that we should expect to see stuff coming through in the coming months (hopefully the next 2 months).
    Tech Support
    BETA PowerArchive 22.00.11 - Windows 11 Context Menu duplicated/additional tier
    TheAndyMacT
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    No Icons for SFX-Archives
    MerowingerM
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    Zip extraction from windows 11 by windows
    D
    Basically I used powerarchiver context menus to zip up a folder then i used windows 11 own built in zip extractor via the context menu to extract all and this is where it throw up a fault. , I’m using windows 11 . The file that was a problem in the zip that windows 11 could not extract was iva “babe” cotton.jpg I know it has non standard quotes in it. However I had winrar on the computer and tried the exact same method with their context menu compress to zip and then I extracted the file with windows own extract all context menu and it had no problems. This indicates that powerarchiver is doing something different with iva “babe” cotton.jpg compressing to zip. Then I changed iva “babe” cotton.jpg to iva babe cotton.jpg and compressed it with powerarchiver and then tried it with windows 11 extract all and had no problems. It looks like powerarchiver is doing something to that one file that has quotes in it. Please note that powerarchiver extracted both zip files with no problems, only windows built in zip extraction had the fault. Reason I’m letting people know in case they send zip files with special characters in files names to people who do not have powerarchiver. When will a fix be implemented?
    Tech Support
    Installer problem
    L
    On installing the program I am getting the error message: "Unable to execute file c:\Program Files\PowerArchiver\pashutil.exe CreateProcess failed: code 2 The system cannot find the file specified" This can’t be right! I am using the latest official build of Windows 11
    Tech Support
    Button alignment. About window.
    LuxorL
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    Button alignment on config window.
    LuxorL
    Topic thumbnail image
    Tech Support
    BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.10
    spwolfS
    New version: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.10: Download: https://u.powerarchiver.com/pa2023/powarc220010.exe New build for some bug fixes and issues - full list to come with new update. Please test and see if you have any issues. Thanks everyone for your assistance!
    Tech Support
    BETA: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.11
    spwolfS
    New version: PowerArchiver 2023 - 22.00.11: Download: https://u.powerarchiver.com/pa2023/powarc220011.exe New build for some bug fixes and issues - full list to come with new update. Please test and see if you have any issues. Thanks everyone for your assistance!
    Tech Support
    THE SSL CERTIFICATE FOR *.POWERARCHIVER.COM HAS EXPIRED.
    Brian GregoryB
    @spwolf @Mili THE SSL CERTIFICATE FOR *.POWERARCHIVER.COM HAS EXPIRED.
    Tech Support
    PA2023 22.00.09 trying to delete a directory from a tar file.
    Brian GregoryB
    I had a large .tar file (a backed up WSL) and I want to delete a few directories and their contents from it using PA2023. PA just destroys the whole archive as soon as I try to delete a directory, leaving it in a state where PA2023 won’t even open it any more. I tried several times and also tried compressing it to .tar.xz instead - same result. This should either actually work, or it should say operation not supported and do nothing.
    Tech Support
    PA 2023: No portable version?
    A
    Hello! The regular version of PA 2023 is out for over 6 months now, but there is still no sign of the portable release. (When) will there be one? Thanks!
    Tech Support

    Poor interface

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Tech Support
    11 Posts 3 Posters 9.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • TBGBeT Offline
      TBGBe
      last edited by

      Most of your “problems” seem to be a skin issue to me.
      Except for the Options Screen / Menu List appearance which is a simple “I like it” vs “I don’t like it” discussion;
      the other things you mention either don’t appear at all for me or at least don’t seem anywhere near as “wrong” with (Classic View / Frostbite Skin).

      P.S. It’s not clear which picture you are referring to as the “3rd shot - This is how a plain, nice applcation looks a like.” Do you really mean shot5.png :eek:

      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • spwolfS Offline
        spwolf conexware
        last edited by

        10.01 will have more standard options interface if you use Classic toolbar.

        Now we will wait for someone to complain about that one :-).

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A Offline
          Aioneru @TBGBe
          last edited by

          @TBGBe:

          Most of your “problems” seem to be a skin issue to me.

          The problem with toolbar being draw incorrectly isn’t a skin problem, the same goes to XP-like view of ListView control (blended selection, different background for current column etc.). It’s rather a problem of using too many custom controls not tested in different configurations. Normal system controls always adapt to the color scheme and/or visual style just fine, but custom controls often has a problem with it forcing XP-like, Office2003-like etc. look. E.g. normal ListView control under 9x/2000 or XP with classical visual style doesn’t have thet blending stuff while it does with visual styles enabled. SO it fits classical style and XP-lovers. The most importing thing is the choice - I don’t like it so I should be able to disable it, forcing custom look of applications seems very MS-like, just look at each Office version - 2007 looks very, very ugly under Win 2000 with all that gradients and silly colors. Yuck. Well, maybe some people like it, so I wouldn’t mind that if there would add an option to turn it off.

          Except for the Options Screen / Menu List appearance which is a simple “I like it” vs “I don’t like it” discussion;

          It’s not a case of taste - it’s a common bug. Simply there was a collor called clWindow used as a background color for checboxes etc. which is simply white under most color schemes. Most doesn’t mean all. Just use clWhite instead and it will match the bitmaped background. It’s a very common bug, it’s hard to belive but even big companies (like e.g. Ahead) are still ignoring color scheme problems so that e.g. all button’s background isn’t transparent but in the common gray-like style which looks poor under everything else than default visual style of Win XP. And again, what is wrong with a TreeView/ListBox so that you have used a custom control (tabs would be fine too) ?

          P.S. It’s not clear which picture you are referring to as the “3rd shot - This is how a plain, nice applcation looks a like.” Do you really mean shot5.png

          Yes, that’s the one. I have upload them in strange order but mentioned them in the right order in text.

          TBGBeT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • TBGBeT Offline
            TBGBe @Aioneru
            last edited by

            Welcome back, nice that you didn’t just complain and leave :D
            @Aioneru:

            The problem with toolbar being draw incorrectly isn’t a skin problem …

            Sorry, but the toolbar is totally a property of the skin.
            All I can tell/see from your screenshots is that you are not using a default skin.
            If you try different skins, you wil see that the toolbar appearance does change (not just the icons).
            Can you expand on what you consider to be the “drawn incorrectly” problem - I can’t see it from your screenshots.
            @Aioneru:

            … visual style … MS-like …

            Sorry I don’t understand any of this. I am just a user -not a GUI expert. As I said, using Frostbite skin, the “background problems” in your “shot.png” don’t appear.
            @Aioneru:

            … And again, what is wrong with a TreeView/ListBox so that you have used a custom control (tabs would be fine too) ?

            This is not a treeview - it is an alternate way of displaying the selection of “screens”. Either as standard tabs or a column of “buttons”.
            @Aioneru:

            Yes, that’s the one. I have upload them in strange order but mentioned them in the right order in text.

            OK. I cannot see the appeal/improvement that you are referring to - but as I said, I am not a GUI expert.:(

            I wonder if GUIDO will comment on all this :D

            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A Offline
              Aioneru @TBGBe
              last edited by

              So, were there any corrections in the classical interface for non visual-styles users, as suggested before ? I don’t want to download version 10.01, so that it mess up again with my nice, old 9.6x version ;). I hope it looks like on the shot5 (see above) and not shot 4, or else I’ll start looking for other compression utility with the same possibilities as PA but with a normal UI (WZ finally started to evolve in that way)…

              TBGBeT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • spwolfS Offline
                spwolf conexware
                last edited by

                some changes yes - looking exactly like PA 2006, no…

                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • TBGBeT Offline
                  TBGBe @Aioneru
                  last edited by

                  @Aioneru:

                  So, were there any corrections in the classical interface for non visual-styles users, as suggested before ? …

                  Here’s how mine looks
                  Windows XP Style Silver
                  PA 2007 skin Frostbite

                  Note File/Edit/View moved to bottom (just because I can).
                  attachment_p_11395_0_pa2007-1.png

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A Offline
                    Aioneru @spwolf
                    last edited by

                    @spwolf:

                    some changes yes - looking exactly like PA 2006, no…

                    I don’t mean it to look like PA 9, but rather as any other Windows application when skinning of PA and Vissual Styles are not active (so just like PA 9 did, but it’s only a coincidence).

                    I belive that you did not play enough with Easy Listview properties after switching to it too much. Look at Shot1, it’s still wrong. Things to fix IMO are:

                    • height of header (Header.Height): change from default 21 to 17 (default value for header height under Win 9x and later) or get it from the system via the metrics API (I don’t really belive that anybody would change this, but you might want to get it and not simply set it to a constant value),
                    • blended selection highlighting: if you really need this blending with background you could make this an option in configuration, or at least set this properly to - Selection.Color := clHighlight and Selection.BorderColor := clNone or something similiar so that selection rectangles for each items does not overlap,
                    • there’s something wrong with the full row highlighting, it’s not highligthing full row but only part of it, I can’t figure out what property can be wrong but I’m sure it’s not as it should be,
                    • current sorted column highlighting should be optional too, plus the color used for highlighting is wrong it should be calculated form the clWindow (I’m not sure, since I’m not using XP but AFAIR it’s not any system color but rather 20% lighter/darker version of clWindow),
                    • tooltips (hints) are now gray (it’s clSilver or clWindow) and not clInfoBk, why ?

                    Shot2:

                    • buttons are much better than this thing used last time but you could use SpeedButton with grouping because now you can not tell which page is active,
                    • background color of each page is wrong, it’s clSilver or clWindow while it should be clBtnFace (plus Transparent set to True on all Checkboxes and Labels).
                      attachment_p_11396_0_shot1.png
                      attachment_p_11396_1_shot2.png
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • spwolfS Offline
                      spwolf conexware
                      last edited by

                      • full row highlighting is bug in this case, we will take an look.

                      We will also adjust colors a bit for some screens but we can not add any options until bigger update.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • spwolfS Offline
                        spwolf conexware
                        last edited by

                        check with b1 and see if it is any better for you.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post