-
I noticed that the option to add the optimize archive function to the context menu is missing on Windows 10.
Opening each archive with the interface in order to click it becomes tedious with many files.Same for others functions like Remove Archive Encryption
-
It would be nice to be able to at least extract Zstandard archives.
-
I prefer to use light themes, and when, for example, I have set up my main archive screen to be Classic Toolbar with Blizzard Blue, files in the archive are highlighted (no checkboxes, full row select) with white text on grey background. They are easy to see .
However, in the Add screens, the files and folders are black type upon a pale blue background, which is not so readily visible, especially when highlighting separate files in lists with Ctrl/Click for addition. It would be ideal if the backgrounds to files in these screens could be set to mimic the highlighting of those in the main archive window.
I have tried experimenting with different themes and settings for skins, toolbars and so forth, but, unless I’ve missed something, none seem to give me the effect I want.
-
Re: Windows 11 Context menu support
It would really make me happy if you put .BH in the Windows 11 context menu. I know it’s in the “More Options” section, but this would make it more convenient. Don’t know why the option to add it to the menu isn’t there in the first place. P-L-E-A-S-E ??? :) Thanks You!
-
Any chance of including this format in a future release?
https://github.com/FS-make-simple/paq9a
Exceptional compression levels.
Thanks.
-
Now that the Windows Store is making support for non-UWP apps mainstream, including those with their own update delivery process, it would be nice to see PowerArchiver in the Windows Store going forwards - at least as a channel for the product to be available.
-
Tell us what features you want from new format…
-
In Windows 11 a new explorer context menu is introduced.
The “old” context menu may still be accessed through an additional mouse click, to reach the PowerArchiver context menu functions, but this isn’t comfortable at all.Could you add PowerArchiver items to the first level (and ideally disable the Windows native ZIP entry)
-
I’m surprised that OneDrive for Business isn’t supported. I can’t link my company’s OneDrive account, but a personal (free) account works fine.
-
Hi,
I’d like to propose an improvement for password protected archives.
Actual behavior is:
If I open an archive, which is password protected and make a typo in the password dialog, I’ll get the message, that the password was wrong and I end up with an empty window. I need to reopen the archive to be able to enter the password again.Improved behavior:
Tell me, that the password was wrong and give me the chance to enter the correct password to decrypt the archive. -
Hello!
I know I have been asking for this feature some time ago, but as nothing has changed let me ask again:
The ZIPX-format offers an algorithm, that compresses JPEG-files by about 20-30%. Please add compression (packing) support for this in ZIPX-archives to Powerarchiver. Extraction of JPEGs packed into ZIPX by this algorithm is already supported by Powerarchiver for a long time, so it should not be difficult? Or is it a licensing problem?
Thanks!
I want better performance for IO Operations
-
Hello,
I want to have the option to customize application buffer sizes so as to optimize IO operations.
Point of case: I was trying to extract a single-file, 45+GB in size, from a RAR archive. This took almost seven hours, because the PA Toolbox kept reading and writing data to HDD almost simultaneously.
On computers with decent amounts of RAM (> 8GB), I would like to have the option to control the buffer sizes for compression:
Input: Up to 128 MB.
Output: Up to 1 GB.This way, PowerArchiver Toolbox 2015 does not read 32 KB of data, or whatever small amount it currently does, but reads my proposed 128 MB in one pass, leaves the HDD alone while it’s performing the in-memory extraction, then writes data back to the HDD.
I believe this will add significant performance improvements, because of no longer having to wait for the hard drive to recover from reading/ reading in a location different than the previous one.
On modern hard drives, reading or writing to consecutive blocks is very optimized. Let’s use that. And let’s also better use the amounts of RAM on modern computers.
If we could also imagine a compression mechanism that uses larger-size buffers, that would be great. It will definitely help us improve on our IO usage and performance (due to not congesting IO but by coordinating I and O for smart operations).
Thanks,
R.