-
Hi.
I noticed that when I want to run the Virtual Drive for the first time inside the PowerArchiver Burner it prompts to download it form the internet.
I was wondering, would it be OK to include this utility straight into the offline installer to be able to set it up locally?
Thank you!
-
How about recognising a few more (or all) of the file formats that are basically renamed zip files and treating them is if they are zip files.
For instance Android .apk files are just renamed .zip files.
Libreoffice/Openoffice ODF documents are all, as far as I am aware, just renamed .zip files. (.odt, .ott, .ods, .ots, .odp, .otp, .odb, .odf etc.) -
-
-
Hi,
I’d like to suggest, that the correct archive type is (always) selected, when adding files by drag & drop to an archive.
This is already happening if the archive has the correct extension. For example, if I’m adding files to test.zip, zip will be selected. If I’m adding files to test.7z, 7z will be selected as format in “Add dialog”.
But this won’t be working, if the archive has not the “right” extension.
So XPI files (Firefox addons) for example are ZIP files. PowerArchiver opens them without any problems, but if I try to add file by drag & drop, PowerArchiver won’t auto select “ZIP”, but use the last selected archive format, while PowerArchiver already knows, that I’m trying to add files to a ZIP. -
Would it be possible at all in some future version perhaps, to have a “find file” function?
Reason I ask is that I was looking for a certain file I knew existed in an archive, but I had to unzip it then use another tool to find the file. It would have saved that extra step if that function existed in PA itself. -
Hi.
Is there a way to enable the user to encrypt the files inside a ZIPX archive that has already been created?
This could save time for large archives that the user may need to encrypt at a later stage or that he/she has forgotten to enable encryption before creating the archive,
Thank you!
-
Hi.
I would like to see a new feature implemented: a ‘Fast Extract’ Mode.
Currently PowerArchiver extracts files to a temporary directory and then moves them to the target directory chosen by the user. At least via drag and drop.
This can be both time consuming and needs free space on the system drive for large files.
Is there a way to directly extract files to the target directory with PowerArchiver?
And if not, can a feature like this be considered for future updates?Thanks very much!
-
Hello.
I believe it would be useful to implement Serpent-256 encryption for PAE/PAE2 formats, even though PowerArchiver offers strong encryption ciphers already.
(deleted part advertising other software - admin)
Do you think this will be a useful addition?
Thank you for the consideration!
-
Hello!
I think it would be a great option to make the portable version of PowerArchiver compatible with PortableApps (i.e. adding the necessary files and folders to integrate it smoothly into their structure).
I own various other commercial programmes which -when installed in portable mode- offer to make the becessary changes without needing an extra installer or the official PortableApps repos.
Thanks for opinions or perhaps even a realization of this.
A.Borque -
Presently, PowerArchiver 2019 (any build) cannot rename PBS filenames by single clicking on such entry or right-click menu has no “Rename” feature!
Hmm, even pressing F2 on selected entry does nothing :(
-
Please add support for ownCloud / Nextcloud, thanks.
-
-
-
Hi,
I had a look at the command line switches, but there are no switches to change the startup mode.
At the moment, PowerArchiver opens in the last used mode.
Opening PowerArchiver from Start Menu or Desktop: Start in Explorer Mode Opening PowerArchiver by double clicking an archive: Start PowerArchiver in Archive Mode
I’d like to have command line switches to influence the startup mode.
Basically, the aim is: -
OT: A while back I requested that moving up and down in an archive’s folder structure could be considered to work with a mouse’s forward and back buttons like windows explorer does. It is so automatic for me I still try to use them with PA first before realising I have to double-click on the two dots. Can this be done?
by @drteeth
-
I know CRC32 was the standard for checking the integrity of compressed files but it is not really used anymore. Can you add ones that are used now MD5 or SHA?
-
Opening the ‘Backup’ I still wonder how PA is ordering the files.
It’s not by name, not by last run…
Is it not possible to have them ordered by NAME (default).
Now you have to click on Name to have a meaning overview. If you jump to ‘archive’ and back to ‘backup’, they are again disordered0_1523006481222_7f290e95-2f9a-4c85-bdc1-d8ba0831b91f-image.png
Thx.
Inteligent archiving
-
would like to see pa choose what format archiving format to store files in so if you have some fikle that wont compress and if doing so would create bigger files then just to store them .
However if say zip is best then use it and if 7zip is best for that file use it. But to store it all in a container archive with encryption.
In effect several archives in one container archive.
For example some archive formats are better at txt files than say music files.
This would save me ages sending people files over the internet and cut my uploading to disc time.
-
I think that is a good idea.
I suppose I thought that is what “optimized” did. But I just did a test run with 8 files of very different types, and all are compressed with LZMA. Now perhaps it is best for all. Not sure.
-
sure, thats what optimized does. Both ZIPX and 7Z have limited choice of options there though, only PAF will have sufficient level of different codecs to make real difference.
-
Thanks.
So the idea is that PAF will (a) have more different forms of compression that are file-type specific, AND (b) that at least some number of these will provide better compression for their respective file-types that any other format. Correct?
I realize the developing such a format is a major endeavor (albeit one which, if realized, will clearly put PA way ahead of all archivers). When, realistically, might it be ready?
Two last questions (1) I assume the convert module will let us turn PAF files into more familiar formats, and (2) will we be able to create SFX from PAF files?
-
yes… it will have specific codecs for pdf, docx, png, jpeg, mp3, odf, html, etc.
which will enable proper compression of those, which will be at least 20-30% better, depending on format.
-
If each is 20-30% better than the respective best compressors, then the combined archive will be ever better than that!
Do you have a ballpark estimate for completion?
Am I correct about conversions and SFX’s?
-
it shall be awesome, one day :-).
We will start testing of basics in months… it will take a while for everything.
As to the conversions and SFX, sure, just like any other format.
-
while we would like to have it tomorrow, when you develop new things such as codecs, things almost never go as planned :-).
But we did mountain of work already.