Optimize archive on Context Menu

[manuangi]

sometimes I like to check the archive properties…and I have to open the archive in PA then click on the “properties” button (which I have enabled)…

I think it would be good to have a context menu option for that, such as “Archive properties”

what do you think?

by the way…is there any way to put a shortcut in the \sendto folder, pointing directly to the Properties function…by a command line switch?
sort of “\pa\powarc.exe /info”

[manuangi]

up

no way?

[TBGBe]

I agree, at the moment PA does not enable “info” unless it already has the archive open.
Even using PA main window Explorer view.

[spwolf]

Original archive info was done without explorer view in mind… Let us actually do new properties box and then we will see if we can do this as well. It is right now at the back of our 9.5 working list, so far.

thanks,

[manuangi]

9.5 running, but no changes about this?

the best would be having a tab in the box opened via WindowsExplorer’s “Properties” menu voice, just as the archives associated with WinR** do (I love that feature, you don’t have to open the program to see the archive’s properties!)

anything coming in the near future? it would be great!
thank you!

[Ricco]

Support this wish :)

[klumy]

good idea

another good idea, wpild be if the properties info would be shown up as tooltip in the windows explorer

[jowood]

@klumy:

another good idea, wpild be if the properties info would be shown up as tooltip in the windows explorer

Full agree. Winzip shows these properties for years.

[manuangi]

@spwolf:

Original archive info was done without explorer view in mind… Let us actually do new properties box and then we will see if we can do this as well. It is right now at the back of our 9.5 working list, so far.

thanks,

spwolf?

up

[spwolf]

we didnt finish new properties box… So, when it appears in PA, we will try to the shell extension for it as well.

thanks!

[manuangi]

@spwolf:

we didnt finish new properties box… So, when it appears in PA, we will try to the shell extension for it as well.

thanks!

good, at least I’m happy to know you’ve been working on the feature :)

[spwolf]

bump

[manuangi]

@spwolf:

bump

yea! you had promised ;)

[Claude Renaud]

Ok, I vote for that too !