Navigation

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Do not include the extension in the file name of the compressed file

      Mario Lopez

      Hello everyone

      I hope that despite my poor control of English, you can understand me.

      When compressing a file, by default the extension is included as part of the file name. for example, if the file is name.pdf, the compressed file will be name_pdf.zip.

      Is there any way for the extensions not to be included in the compressed file name? As much as I have searched I don’t see such an option.

      Thanks for your time

      Tech Support
    • Issues converting a folder of .zip files to .lhz files

      O

      Hi,

      I’m using Convert Archives on a local folder of .zip files, converting them to .lzh files, and I’m finding that perhaps 1 in 75 files is actually converting and outputting a file. Even then, the .lzh file is incomplete, missing most of the source files.

      The progress bars completes OK, say 75/75 files, but only one .lzh file exists in the output folder.

      It seems to be the same with different source and output folders on both local and USB disk - I can’t see a pattern.

      The files extract and compress (to .lzh) without issue on their own.

      Is there a log file I can check please, to see why PA does not like these files as part of the batch conversion?

      Thanks very much, Rich.

      Tech Support
    • Slow multipart RAR extraction

      A

      I’m experiencing very slow extraction speed of multipart RAR files. For the first part the extraction is super fast but when PA reaches the part2.rar the extraction from there on gets super slow. PA needed for a 6,3 GB multipart archive 30 minutes to extract. I tested then with another program and it just took 70 seconds. I had this slow extraction speed with PA for quite a long time and I always thought that is maybe because of a high compression rate that the extraction would take longer. But it seems that only PA gets that slow.

      I have lots of multipart archives that are 10+ GB and with PA it would be really time consuming. Is there any solution to this?

      Tech Support
    • Can't create PA files

      B

      Hi -

      I have powerarchiver licenses for powerarchiver standard and toolbox (and also as a result for pro).

      I can successfully register powerarchiver with my pro/toolbox codes, and it unlocks the majority of the content/features. However if I try and create a .pa style archive I get the registration popup saying I need PowerArchiver Pro (if I go to help/about I can verify I have the relevant version and it’s registered to me).

      Tech Support
    • PA2021: Cannot close ZIP Comment

      BigMike

      Hi,

      I can’t close ZIP archive comments. Neither in archive nor in explorer view the “x button” works. I’m testing with PA 20.00.73 (x64 and x86)

      e5f2dd8c-e008-4c26-a364-4b1a0a8f8c69-image.png

      Tech Support
    • Powerarchiver 2021 incorrectly extract tar.xz file

      E

      Configuration:
      Powerarchiver 2021 20.00.73
      Windows 10 Education 10.0.19042 Build 19042

      When extracting gcc-arm-10.2-2020.11-mingw-w64-i686-arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz , Powerarchiver wrongly thinks some .exe files have a length of zero:

      98773b3b-65c0-48fa-8cd4-d081b2e0adee-image.png

      Once extracted:

      D:\Temp\Powerarchiver\gcc-arm-10.2-2020.11-mingw-w64-i686-arm-none-linux-gnueabihf\bin>dir *.exe Volume in drive D is DATA Volume Serial Number is 0E12-BCA2 Directory of D:\Temp\Powerarchiver\gcc-arm-10.2-2020.11-mingw-w64-i686-arm-none-linux-gnueabihf\bin 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 1,391,599 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-addr2line.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ar.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-as.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 3,030,119 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-c++.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 1,389,293 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-c++filt.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 3,027,513 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-cpp.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 4,040,503 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-dwp.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 391,769 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-elfedit.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-g++.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 3,026,926 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-10.2.1.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 609,607 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-ar.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 609,607 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-nm.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 609,607 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-ranlib.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 2,165,533 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcov-dump.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 2,343,605 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcov-tool.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 2,450,233 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcov.exe 2020-11-20 07:54 PM 9,605,899 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gdb.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 3,028,997 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gfortran.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 1,412,943 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gprof.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld.gold.exe 2020-11-20 07:41 PM 25,546,567 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-lto-dump.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-nm.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-objcopy.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-objdump.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ranlib.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-readelf.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 1,393,083 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-size.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 1,392,464 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-strings.exe 2020-11-20 07:10 PM 0 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-strip.exe 32 File(s) 67,465,867 bytes 0 Dir(s) 1,002,422,431,744 bytes free

      When the same archive is being extracted from a git bash session (after having installed git 2.30.1 for Windows 64 bit version from git-scm.com), the .exe files are extracted as expected:

      xz -k -d gcc-arm-10.2-2020.11-mingw-w64-i686-arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz tar xf gcc-arm-10.2-2020.11-mingw-w64-i686-arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.tar cd gcc-arm-10.2-2020.11-mingw-w64-i686-arm-none-linux-gnueabihf/bin ll *.exe -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 1391599 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-addr2line.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 1421598 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ar.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 2028927 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-as.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 3030119 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-c++.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 1389293 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-c++filt.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 3027513 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-cpp.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 4040503 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-dwp.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 391769 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-elfedit.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 3030119 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-g++.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 3026926 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-10.2.1.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 609607 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-ar.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 609607 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-nm.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 609607 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-ranlib.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 3026926 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 2165533 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcov-dump.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 2343605 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcov-tool.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 2450233 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcov.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 9605899 Nov 20 19:54 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gdb.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 3028997 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gfortran.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 1412943 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gprof.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 4 User 197121 2572182 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 4 User 197121 2572182 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 4550029 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld.gold.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 25546567 Nov 20 19:41 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-lto-dump.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 1404945 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-nm.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 1531656 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-objcopy.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 1991350 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-objdump.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 1421598 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ranlib.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 1163376 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-readelf.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 1393083 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-size.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 User 197121 1392464 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-strings.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 2 User 197121 1531656 Nov 20 19:10 arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-strip.exe*

      The same archive file does extract properly under a native Linux Ubuntu 20.04 system, or under Windows 10 using the WSL2 Linux subsystem using xz and tar.

      Tech Support
    • Log waite for bugs to be fixed

      D

      Its a long time since people reported bugs like converter bug still no fix yet

      Tech Support
    • Is PowerArchiver 2021 stable?

      BigMike

      Hi,

      I just saw, that on the Website, PowerArchiver 2021 20.00.73 is advertised as latest version. (Actually, the downloaded version says, it’s 20.00.70 in the about dialog)
      But it still comes with the “red icon set” for preview versions and has some known unfixed bugs, as I read here.

      Is it sufficiently stable to be used on production systems?

      Kind regards

      Tech Support
    • File Browser: Operations don't trigger UAC

      BigMike

      This happens in Archive and Explorer Mode:

      Navigate to a folder, which is UAC protected (for example C:\Program Files) Right click -> New -> Folder (or any other item)
      => Nothing happens

      Expected behaviour: UAC prompt is triggered and a new folder (or file) will be created

      PowerArchiver 19.00.57

      Tech Support
    • Bugs I found and wanted to share with the team.

      B

      Hi I recently bought PowerArchiver and found some bugs and issues that I hit testing some of the features out.

      If you are doing a backup and on the compression options screen its default is compression format is PA with no option to change disk spanning. If you change to 7-zip you can change disk spanning. If you change the disk spanning then move back to PA format the field for disk spanning disables but the option stays set to what you changed it to. When you do a backup it will use PA with files spanning but PowerArchiver says that its not a valid format when you open it. If PA can’t really do file spanning then this screen is allowing it.

      I have attached an image where the progress bar is in the middle of the CD/DVD/BD Tools screen.

      alt text

      I have a 7-Zip file I created using the backup tools doing an increment backup. It opens and extracts just fine but if you using the Test option PowerArchiver locks up. Link to file: Backup-2021-02-05-20-35-36 TEST LOCKUP.7z

      On any Zip/PA/7-Zip process the pause and cancel buttons do not work. You have to hard kill the entire application to get out.

      Tech Support
    • Does PA supports Intel's zlib?

      G

      There would be many of us with Intel Processors.

      and they have their own optimized zlib algorithm, which can result in more efficiency if used combined with their hardware processor.

      Reference:
      https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/zlib-compression-whitepaper-copy.pdf

      Can we get the same Functionality Under Hardware Acceleration Feature?

      Zlib is not the only feature that intel has included with their processor, there’s many, which if combined can result in efficient and better compression ratios.

      Tech Support
    • PA Batch Archive post completion error

      G

      Hi,

      After the batch archiving is complete, and if I click on whitespace of the PA app, I get this error.

      PA Batch.png

      I did check for ongoing process and ensured no archives were corrupt, It seems like activity did complete successfully but the error is shown for no reason, and only after clicking the whitespace.

      Please see if this can be removed.

      Tech Support
    • PA and conflict with Antivirus

      G

      I’m using the Kaspersky Total Security.

      I have configured PA as exclusion as followed:

      PA Exclusion.png

      and also is set us trusted application

      PA Trusted Application.png

      Scenario:

      My Antivirus likes to scan for everything, and it’s safeguarding behavior is to prevent the access to the file until the file is properly scanned for.

      The issue:

      PA when losses the access to file, it is stuck, consumes Resources, and never completes the process or throws any error

      Recommendation:
      PAStarter should also work as PAMonitor:
      There should be a monitoring process, at least if I’m using queuing feature, that should check for never ending compression processes and terminate them so the queue can be little bit automated.

      Also,
      There should be multiple attempts at retrying if PA loses access to or is denied, instead of having to see process was stuck for longer duration.

      Or, better, save the parameters I used for keeping the files in compression, and automatically restart the whole compression process after termination the same, of same folders and files set, this should happen in case if compression was stuck.

      Tech Support
    • Using the Queue Feature affects Compression Ratio negatively

      G

      If you use Queue Feature, you are not saving on space, you are just squeezing less.

      Here’s explaination:

      https://youtu.be/XcxG2wxyink

      I did test the same on multiple files, and of different types.

      It does have large difference for each large file you are trying to squeeze.

      Folders with multiple files, just have no benefits if you use Queue Feature

      Tech Support
    • Problems with Color-scheme after upgrade to build 73

      A

      Hello!
      I am using the portable version of PA2021. After switching from build 58 to 73 I have problems with the color-scheme:
      While 58 behaves like expected and showed everything in light or dark colors according to the settings, 73 always shows the lower part of the window in dark colors, no matter whether I select automatic, light or dark.
      This happens on a clean installation of 73 as well as on an update from build 58. I have attached two images generated on the same machine at the same time with the same settings. The upper shows build 73, the lower 58. Is it a bug or some changed setting I miss?
      Thanks for help!
      A.Borque

      PA2021_73.png PA2021_58.png

      Tech Support
    • Command line

      L

      Hello,

      PowerArchiver Command Line 7 support file greater than 2 Go ?

      Thanks

      Tech Support
    • PA shows incorrect archive properties

      G

      If you have tabbed archive browsing(reuse same window for all archive opening)
      and if you open two archives, and right click on older one to view properties it will only show of the recent archive that was opened, on all tabs/archives

      upgraded to 20.0.73

      Tech Support
    • Can I activate PowerArchiver on 2 devices with 1 license?

      2

      Hi.

      I currently own the PowerArchiver Select - lifetime free upgrades and support for PowerArchiver Toolbox English license.

      This license is active on 1 device. Does the license allow me to activate PowerArchiver on a second device that I own? Or do I need a separate license for that?

      Thank you ! :)

      Tech Support
    • No updates for portable version?

      A

      Hello!
      While the installable version of PA 2021 has already received two updates and is at version 20.0.73 the portable version still remains at the initially released build 58. Are there plans to update that version, too?
      Thanks for a reply!

      Tech Support
    • PowerArchiver shell extensions possibly crashing windows explorer.exe

      U

      I’ve been dealing with an intermittent explorer.exe crash for 5-6 years now. It happens randomly and will usually occur multiple times within a single session of an hour or two on my machine when manipulating files through Windows Explorer. explorer.exe is the only thing that ever crashes, so it’s not hardware IMO. I’ve done all hardware diagnostics and RAM is good. I’ve even swapped out motherboards with different brand and even the exact same one and it still crashes. sfc /scannow indicates system files are fine. I’ve done multiple reinstalls of the OS with no positive results. This crashing has happened on Windows 7 64-bit and Windows 10 64-bit. It seemed to get more frequent with Windows 10 after upgrading last year. I’ve also been using PowerArchiver throughout that time period (upgrading over time with new releases). I recently disabled all non-Microsoft extensions via ShellExView and saw no crashes for about 10 days, which is really unusual. I turned back them all back on after 10 days and saw another explorer.exe crash within the hour. So I disabled all 32-bit extensions and saw another crash. Following that I disabled all the PowerArchiver shell extensions and haven’t seen a crash after a day of heavy usage manipulating files within Windows Explorer, which doesn’t happen for me. The crash dumps I’ve captured don’t seem to indicate PowerArchiver is involved but I have a hunch it has something do with PowerArchiver shell extensions. The system even feels smoother with the PA extensions disabled. Windows 10 reliability monitor always has the same type of problem:

      Description Faulting Application Path: C:\WINDOWS\explorer.exe Problem signature Problem Event Name: BEX64 Application Name: explorer.exe Application Version: 10.0.17134.165 Application Timestamp: 4031a9f8 Fault Module Name: StackHash_e78e Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0 Fault Module Timestamp: 00000000 Exception Offset: PCH_8D_FROM_ntdll+0x000000000009AA54 Exception Code: c0000005 Exception Data: 0000000000000008 OS Version: 10.0.17134.2.0.0.256.48 Locale ID: 1033 Additional Information 1: e78e Additional Information 2: e78e327659b46c9a0c6916396b253cbf Additional Information 3: cebf Additional Information 4: cebf952c5db535ae7880488aafce55d9 Extra information about the problem Bucket ID: 1a57e4e784fbc735c231c68bd88581a9 (1311047270476906921)

      I know this is a very nebulous explanation but is there any way to link this up to PA shell extensions as the cause? I can provide the crash dumps and additional information if necessary.

      Tech Support

    Looking for forum moderators

    Tech Support
    7
    32
    15517
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • spwolf
      spwolf conexware last edited by

      Hi guys/girls,

      we are looking for 2-3 forum mods that can delete these spammers as soon as they arrive. We try to delete them as soon as we notice them but we are here only 20 hrs a day :D.

      So we need 2-3 mods just to moderate spam.

      Only other option would be to moderate actual posts, which means everyone will need to wait for their posts to be approved which is no option really. We appreciate user feedback and would never do that.

      thank you!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • TBGBe
        TBGBe last edited by

        @spwolf:

        … but we are here only 20 hrs a day :D.

        So we need 2-3 mods just to moderate spam.

        So you want people for up to 4 hrs per day or … ?

        spwolf 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • spwolf
          spwolf conexware @TBGBe last edited by

          @TBGBe:

          So you want people for up to 4 hrs per day or … ?

          not specific time, but that they login in several times per day and if they see spam, just remove it and ban spammers.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • moles42
            moles42 Alpha Testers last edited by

            I’m here pretty regularly and often see these spammers before you guys because of the timezone I’m in…count me in if you need another set of eyes guys…:)

            skypx 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • skypx
              skypx @moles42 last edited by

              I’m available if needed.

              Luxor 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Luxor
                Luxor Alpha Testers @skypx last edited by

                I’m available most of the time, health permitting.
                And would gladly give my time to keep these annoying spammers at bay.

                I report plenty of them through the report function, so it would be no trouble to go that extra step. ;)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • spwolf
                  spwolf conexware last edited by

                  thanks guys… I took Terry’s question as voluteering too :-).

                  I will figure out how to set it up and let you guys know!

                  TBGBe 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • TBGBe
                    TBGBe @spwolf last edited by

                    Yes, but not 24/7/365 :p

                    spwolf 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • spwolf
                      spwolf conexware @TBGBe last edited by

                      @TBGBe:

                      Yes, but not 24/7/365 :p

                      its purely when you login, nothing required just appreciated. We cant ask for more when all of you guys are alreadu doing a lot :)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • RJWaring
                        RJWaring last edited by

                        I dont mind volunteering! I check PA At home and at work during the day! as well as recently warning and red carding spammers! Give me the ability to delete them and I will be more than happy to assit!

                        TBGBe 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • TBGBe
                          TBGBe @RJWaring last edited by

                          @Sir:

                          … Give me the ability to delete them and I will be more than happy to assit!

                          Some posts are obvious spam, but some may be questionable and I would propose a “quarantine” rather than immediate delete - just in case. :p

                          Note: There is a need to monitor replies (as well as new threads) without “destroying” the existing thread.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • spwolf
                            spwolf conexware last edited by

                            there is easy way to simply select post and delete as spam, bam user, without affecting rest of the thread :-)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • spwolf
                              spwolf conexware last edited by

                              okay, so all of you + amh are now mods as well… you should be able to select any post then click on delete post as spam in moderation dropdown and it will give you easy option to delete all posts by user as well as ban him (indefintly).

                              this is of course to be done only with spammers :-).

                              and thanks a lot :P

                              TBGBe 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • TBGBe
                                TBGBe @spwolf last edited by

                                Cool :p

                                Luxor 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Luxor
                                  Luxor Alpha Testers @TBGBe last edited by

                                  Spammers beware. ;)

                                  <deleted pointless="" question="">

                                  Ignore just spotted the drop-down menu :rolleyes:</deleted>

                                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A
                                    amh209 @Luxor last edited by

                                    That’s pretty good Luxor, the first moderating you had to do was on yourself. :D

                                    Luxor 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Luxor
                                      Luxor Alpha Testers @amh209 last edited by

                                      Well you know what they say, practice makes perfect. :p

                                      TBGBe 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • TBGBe
                                        TBGBe @Luxor last edited by

                                        Or even
                                        Quis_custodiet_ipsos_custodes :D

                                        skypx 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • skypx
                                          skypx @TBGBe last edited by

                                          Guess I’m the slow moderator…… :D All I see is the infraction/AluminumHaste button. I’ve been looking but I don’t see any options to delete a spam post. :confused:

                                          moles42 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • moles42
                                            moles42 Alpha Testers @skypx last edited by

                                            not seeing this buddy?
                                            attachment_p_20294_0_spam.png

                                            skypx 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • skypx
                                              skypx @moles42 last edited by

                                              No, not even close. This is all I see.
                                              attachment_p_20295_0_moderator-options.jpg

                                              spwolf 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                              • moles42
                                                moles42 Alpha Testers last edited by

                                                a slight oversight on admins part then maybe…you’ve possibly been overlooked…:(
                                                but I’m sure it will be rectified as soon as they return to read this…:)

                                                damn buddy…can’t leave you out of the team !

                                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                • spwolf
                                                  spwolf conexware @skypx last edited by

                                                  @skypx:

                                                  No, not even close. This is all I see.

                                                  fix0r3d :-).

                                                  now you can join in the fun…

                                                  … btw, did you notice now there were no spammers? They are all running scared now :-)

                                                  skypx 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                  • skypx
                                                    skypx @spwolf last edited by

                                                    @moles42:

                                                    a slight oversight on admins part then maybe…you’ve possibly been overlooked…:(
                                                    but I’m sure it will be rectified as soon as they return to read this…:)

                                                    damn buddy…can’t leave you out of the team !

                                                    @spwolf:

                                                    fix0r3d :-).

                                                    now you can join in the fun…

                                                    … btw, did you notice now there were no spammers? They are all running scared now :-)

                                                    Thanks guys! Now I’m ready for them. :cool:

                                                    skypx 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                    • skypx
                                                      skypx @skypx last edited by

                                                      Wow, I think the spammers have packed up and left town! :eek: I’ve been checking regularly but there’s nothing to “moderate”. :D

                                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                      • spwolf
                                                        spwolf conexware last edited by

                                                        there was a lot of porn yesterday :-)

                                                        skypx 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                        • skypx
                                                          skypx @spwolf last edited by

                                                          @spwolf:

                                                          there was a lot of porn yesterday :-)

                                                          Really!!! I can’t believe I missed it! :D Wow, free porn…… my wife really could not get mad since… :D

                                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                          • spwolf
                                                            spwolf conexware last edited by

                                                            When you delete some post, use delete as spam, as it will give you option to ban user as well (and always ban people who post spam).

                                                            thanks!

                                                            Luxor 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                            • RJWaring
                                                              RJWaring last edited by

                                                              I dont get spammers! i really dont. In work we get loads of Spam mostly for viagra and it all comes from China!

                                                              Our IT Department also don’t host any brains so we never get at moderation on spam.

                                                              I think its a fantastic idea to have a group of moderators as for any new prospective customers it doesnt give a could impression if your Support Forum is full of Porn or links to pills etc.

                                                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                              • Luxor
                                                                Luxor Alpha Testers @spwolf last edited by

                                                                @spwolf:

                                                                When you delete some post, use delete as spam, as it will give you option to ban user as well (and always ban people who post spam).

                                                                thanks!

                                                                Will do.

                                                                moles42 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                                • moles42
                                                                  moles42 Alpha Testers @Luxor last edited by

                                                                  I just delete them,ban them and then I’m done with them and I wait for the next sucker to cross my path…:)

                                                                  RJWaring 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                                  • RJWaring
                                                                    RJWaring @moles42 last edited by

                                                                    @moles42:

                                                                    I just delete them,ban them and then I’m done with them and I wait for the next sucker to cross my path…:)

                                                                    You have a Job here my friend! I think the average IQ in our IT Department is about 12 :-D " and im not joking! "

                                                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                                    • First post
                                                                      Last post