• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    MSI release?
    J

    I’m looking forward to deploying PowerArchiver 2023 to my users. Can you tell us when the MSI will be available for download and distribution?

    Thanks.

    Tech Support
    Missing Icons
    LuxorL

    Just tried using the Modern (Windows 10) Icon set and seeing a few missing icons in both PowerArchiver Burner and PowerArchiver Encryption screens . They are all there in the Minimalistik icon set and the only difference I can see is the former is blue and the latter grey. In version 22.00.9

    powerarc_2023-09-18_17-00-19.png

    powerarc_2023-09-18_17-01-05.png

    Tech Support
    Security vulnerabilities in 7zip / Update for PowerArchiver and PACL libraries?
    BigMikeB

    Hi there,

    there were some security issues fixed in 7zip:
    https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1165/
    https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1164/

    As it seems, that PowerArchiver and PACL use the 7zip libraries, could you please update them to the latest version?

    Tech Support
    Virtual Drive
    E

    Hi,

    From where I get PAVD2023.EXE? PowerArchiver 2023 tries to open it.
    But it seems, it tries to download PAVD2021.EXE.

    Thanks

    Tech Support
    Better ZPAQ support
    W

    I noticed that the version of ZPAQ used is older than the latest released 7.15 https://mattmahoney.net/dc/zpaq.html also there seems to be a newer fork that adds several features https://github.com/fcorbelli/zpaqfranz

    It would be useful to implement this latest version (it also maintains the same syntax and behavior as the latest official release if used the -715 flag) and add when opening a zpaq file a choice of the version of the files to show (e.g. as dummy folders represented the various versions present). Since any previous changes are stored with this format, it is possible to extract a snapshot of a certain date/version.

    Tech Support
    Bug with "Encrypt Archive" action
    W

    If I open a password-protected zipper file (created with WinRAR but I think that’s irrelevant), open it with PowerArchiver and run “Remove Encryption” on the same file, then reopen it and add a password with “Encrypt Archive,” the resulting archive will be protected with the old ZipCrypto algorithm and not AES as indicated.
    (this can be verified, for example, by trying to open the archive files with Windows Explorer, which does not support the AES algorithm)

    Tech Support
    PA 21.00.18 Action / Test behaves oddly for me on .PA files
    Brian GregoryB

    PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
    I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
    Discovered:
    a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
    b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files.

    Tech Support

    Closing PA 2010 under Win 7

    Tech Support
    2
    22
    9405
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • drteethD
      drteeth
      last edited by

      I multi-boot all my PCs.

      I have noticed that I takes PA longer to close when pressing the ‘X’ in the upper right of the window under Win 7 (32 bit) than it does under winXP. In one case (Athlon XP 3200, 2Gb) the closing is instantaneous in XP and takes about 6-7 seconds under Win 7. On a much faster system, a difference is still there, albeit in the order of 1-2 seconds.

      Win 7 is an officially obtained and installed/activated 32 bit RC (build 7100) version in both cases.

      Regards

      DrT

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • spwolfS
        spwolf conexware
        last edited by

        there is probably something else in play there, some specific setting… you can send us your registry file HKCU\Software\PowerArchiver via mail that you know already, and we will check it out.

        It shouldnt have anything to do with Win7 itself, but something specific to that PA installation. We run 10 different Win7 versions ourselves.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • spwolfS
          spwolf conexware
          last edited by

          Check if it is faster with this release:
          http://www.powerarchiver.com/test/alpha115/powarc1150rc5.exe

          drteethD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • drteethD
            drteeth @spwolf
            last edited by

            @spwolf:

            Check if it is faster with this release:
            http://www.powerarchiver.com/test/alpha115/powarc1150rc5.exe

            Does not seem to be. I have sent the key that you requested from the slower machine.

            I have 4 PCs here in total so can test this on another 2.

            Regards

            DrT

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • spwolfS
              spwolf conexware
              last edited by

              what happens when you reset defaults? same?

              drteethD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • drteethD
                drteeth @spwolf
                last edited by

                @spwolf:

                what happens when you reset defaults? same?

                It was installed yesterday, and I have changed the same things that I always change when I install PA…mainly the interface and not much else.

                Setting to default values may take a second or two off the time. I also noticed similar delays when clicking buttons on some boxes. For example, clicking ‘ok’ in the main configuration box (options > configuration in modern interface) took a similar delay to close.

                This issue is only affecting PA so far in Win 7 i.e. no other programs have this issue.

                Regards

                DrT

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • spwolfS
                  spwolf conexware
                  last edited by

                  so classic interface is faster?

                  drteethD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • drteethD
                    drteeth @spwolf
                    last edited by

                    @spwolf:

                    so classic interface is faster?

                    If that was the only difference (you’d have to compare my reg file against default values) then yes. Never use the classic interface at all myself.

                    I have just checked with Vista and the issue is NOT present. Seems specific to Win7.

                    Cheers

                    DrT

                    spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • spwolfS
                      spwolf conexware @drteeth
                      last edited by

                      @drteeth:

                      If that was the only difference (you’d have to compare my reg file against default values) then yes. Never use the classic interface at all myself.

                      I have just checked with Vista and the issue is NOT present. Seems specific to Win7.

                      Cheers

                      DrT

                      it might be something as weird as drivers for the graphics card. How fast does it close when you hit close in Classic interface?

                      drteethD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • drteethD
                        drteeth @spwolf
                        last edited by

                        @spwolf:

                        it might be something as weird as drivers for the graphics card. How fast does it close when you hit close in Classic interface?

                        Which PC do you want me to check…the one with Vista or the Athlon XP? The former is a Centrino Duo laptop.

                        Both have nVidia graphics chipsets. But how come only PA is affected by this and no other app at all? Don’t forget closing PA with the default values (on the Athlon)was only slightly faster than with the modern interfece…a noticeable delay is still present on closing.

                        I can also test on the slow starting Celeron which has an Intel integrated chipset.

                        Cheers

                        DrT

                        spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • spwolfS
                          spwolf conexware @drteeth
                          last edited by

                          @drteeth:

                          Which PC do you want me to check…the one with Vista or the Athlon XP? The former is a Centrino Duo laptop.

                          Both have nVidia graphics chipsets. But how come only PA is affected by this and no other app at all? Don’t forget closing PA with the default values (on the Athlon)was only slightly faster than with the modern interfece…a noticeable delay is still present on closing.

                          I can also test on the slow starting Celeron which has an Intel integrated chipset.

                          Cheers

                          DrT

                          i doubt anything i can think of makes an difference right now, it has to be something very specific.

                          I was talking about one with Win7 that has the slowdown, that slowdown is not due to Win7 itself, it is combination of something. As I said, we ourselves have 10 computers running Win7 and Win7 has been quite popular with PA 2010 crowd as well.

                          What happens when you install PA 2009 on that same computer which has slowdown?

                          drteethD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • drteethD
                            drteeth @spwolf
                            last edited by

                            @spwolf:

                            i doubt anything i can think of makes an difference right now, it has to be something very specific.

                            I was talking about one with Win7 that has the slowdown, that slowdown is not due to Win7 itself, it is combination of something. As I said, we ourselves have 10 computers running Win7 and Win7 has been quite popular with PA 2010 crowd as well.

                            What happens when you install PA 2009 on that same computer which has slowdown?

                            PA 2009 closed faster than 2010, about 3-4 secs.

                            I was talking about one with Win7 that has the slowdown,<<

                            The point I am trying to make is that EVERY PC that I try PA 2010 on has the slowdown (both on closing and getting out of dialogue boxes). It is just that the faster the PC, the less noticeable it is. My fastest PC is an Athlon 4800 x2 with 4GB of memory and the slowdown is still there, but hardly noticeable. If all your PCs are relatively modern, you won’t see it either.

                            Cheers

                            DrT

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • spwolfS
                              spwolf conexware
                              last edited by

                              i am not sure what you mean under slowdown - 12 seconds is an big issue and big bug, under 1 second is normal.

                              I notice no such slowdown on any of our Win7 computers, if I slow my cpu down so PA takes 7 seconds to start (instead of 2 regular seconds), i can hit X to close PA and there is no noticable slowdown i can see.

                              Is that slowdown that you notice only on Win7 or all ALL computers you have, all OS’s?

                              What other software do you have on those computers, do you use same AV on all of them?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • drteethD
                                drteeth
                                last edited by

                                Same AV on all, Kaspersky 2009 (XP and Vista) or Kaspersky Win 7 beta. The slowdown is only associated with Win7 and affects all my PCs. The faster the CPU the less of a slowdown there is. I mutliboot all my PCs. All my tests have been run on at least 2 OSs on each PC.

                                SOLVED. I disabled the AV on Win7 - no change. I uninstalled the AV, and NO delay anywhere anymore. As PA is the only program to be affected by this, perhaps a chat with the chaps at Kaspersky may be in order.

                                Cheers

                                DrT

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • spwolfS
                                  spwolf conexware
                                  last edited by

                                  ah, there you go… good one. I knew it had to be something specific.

                                  What really sucks is that I quite often notice that disabling AV’s doesnt really disable them :).

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • spwolfS
                                    spwolf conexware
                                    last edited by

                                    now what version of Kaspersky is that?

                                    drteethD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • spwolfS
                                      spwolf conexware
                                      last edited by

                                      (exact)

                                      and also, if you could complain as an customer, that would be even better (we will also complain).

                                      drteethD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • drteethD
                                        drteeth @spwolf
                                        last edited by

                                        @spwolf:

                                        now what version of Kaspersky is that?

                                        8.0.0.1081 beta for win7, downloadable from within win7.

                                        Cheers

                                        DrT

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • drteethD
                                          drteeth @spwolf
                                          last edited by

                                          @spwolf:

                                          (exact)

                                          and also, if you could complain as an customer, that would be even better (we will also complain).

                                          Will do that now.

                                          Cheers

                                          DrT

                                          spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • spwolfS
                                            spwolf conexware @drteeth
                                            last edited by

                                            @drteeth:

                                            Will do that now.

                                            Cheers

                                            DrT

                                            thank you!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • drteethD
                                              drteeth
                                              last edited by

                                              It looks like the problem might have been solved in the next build, viz 8.0.0.1082

                                              Cheers

                                              DrT

                                              spwolfS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                              • spwolfS
                                                spwolf conexware @drteeth
                                                last edited by

                                                @drteeth:

                                                It looks like the problem might have been solved in the next build, viz 8.0.0.1082

                                                Cheers

                                                DrT

                                                awesome, you definetly got to the bottom of that one! Couldnt believe it had 10 seconds delay :)

                                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                • First post
                                                  Last post