-
It would be nice to be able to at least extract Zstandard archives.
-
I prefer to use light themes, and when, for example, I have set up my main archive screen to be Classic Toolbar with Blizzard Blue, files in the archive are highlighted (no checkboxes, full row select) with white text on grey background. They are easy to see .
However, in the Add screens, the files and folders are black type upon a pale blue background, which is not so readily visible, especially when highlighting separate files in lists with Ctrl/Click for addition. It would be ideal if the backgrounds to files in these screens could be set to mimic the highlighting of those in the main archive window.
I have tried experimenting with different themes and settings for skins, toolbars and so forth, but, unless I’ve missed something, none seem to give me the effect I want.
-
Re: Windows 11 Context menu support
It would really make me happy if you put .BH in the Windows 11 context menu. I know it’s in the “More Options” section, but this would make it more convenient. Don’t know why the option to add it to the menu isn’t there in the first place. P-L-E-A-S-E ??? :) Thanks You!
-
Any chance of including this format in a future release?
https://github.com/FS-make-simple/paq9a
Exceptional compression levels.
Thanks.
-
Now that the Windows Store is making support for non-UWP apps mainstream, including those with their own update delivery process, it would be nice to see PowerArchiver in the Windows Store going forwards - at least as a channel for the product to be available.
-
Tell us what features you want from new format…
-
In Windows 11 a new explorer context menu is introduced.
The “old” context menu may still be accessed through an additional mouse click, to reach the PowerArchiver context menu functions, but this isn’t comfortable at all.Could you add PowerArchiver items to the first level (and ideally disable the Windows native ZIP entry)
-
I’m surprised that OneDrive for Business isn’t supported. I can’t link my company’s OneDrive account, but a personal (free) account works fine.
-
Hi,
I’d like to propose an improvement for password protected archives.
Actual behavior is:
If I open an archive, which is password protected and make a typo in the password dialog, I’ll get the message, that the password was wrong and I end up with an empty window. I need to reopen the archive to be able to enter the password again.Improved behavior:
Tell me, that the password was wrong and give me the chance to enter the correct password to decrypt the archive. -
Hello!
I know I have been asking for this feature some time ago, but as nothing has changed let me ask again:
The ZIPX-format offers an algorithm, that compresses JPEG-files by about 20-30%. Please add compression (packing) support for this in ZIPX-archives to Powerarchiver. Extraction of JPEGs packed into ZIPX by this algorithm is already supported by Powerarchiver for a long time, so it should not be difficult? Or is it a licensing problem?
Thanks! -
Hi,
I’d like to suggest, that the correct archive type is (always) selected, when adding files by drag & drop to an archive.
This is already happening if the archive has the correct extension. For example, if I’m adding files to test.zip, zip will be selected. If I’m adding files to test.7z, 7z will be selected as format in “Add dialog”.
But this won’t be working, if the archive has not the “right” extension.
So XPI files (Firefox addons) for example are ZIP files. PowerArchiver opens them without any problems, but if I try to add file by drag & drop, PowerArchiver won’t auto select “ZIP”, but use the last selected archive format, while PowerArchiver already knows, that I’m trying to add files to a ZIP. -
I love this, only there is one problem. The UAC elevation feature does not extend to Mount Image option in the add-on software PA provided. It is most annoying whenever I am on highest UAC settings and I mount an ISO, every time I open and create a virtual drive UAC appears. I also do not want to completely disable UAC.
Is adding UAC elevation for mount image feature possible?
-
The now defunct Bulkzip had Nanozip (nz) as an option this would be great to have for compatibility with my .nz files, so I don’t have to install Bulkzip separately.
Associations window
-
i know i asked this before but it would help me if i can see what archiver is associated with what archiver. This will help as i use serveral programs that take over control of archive files when installed and i want to makje sure they are not overriding pa. Which can happen i can assure you.
-
Well what you do is configure the other archivers first.
So lets say configure winrar to open rar files.
Then go into PA and it will say Pa is not your default archiver anymore do you want to make it….say NO.Go to options and check all archives EXCEPT RAR and RAR SPANNED.
Now you are set.
Mame
-
true but this means u have to unistall pa and then install say winrar and then install pa long winded. all i wnated to achive here is a way i acn load see which program is registared with what archive format so i could make sure i don’t have a rogue program taking control of that format and stopping pa getting control of it as i have had in the past.
-
I hope you do know that uninstall / install etc is not needed. You can do this just using the associations tab.
You just want to see the currently associated program for each format in that screen - just as <one of=“” the=“” other=“” utilities=“”>does.</one>
-
yes i know that but it does not inform me what program is using what formatr at any time. This feature would make sure that pa or the appropiate archiver i use is actually using that format.
-
Well there is no way to tell fromt he program but you can always check the file associations in windows.
Since PA supports opening many formats set it to open 90% of the formats and uncheck the ones you want to associate with your programs.
Then open winrar or whatever u are using and associate those to their respective formats.
I used to have 4 different archivers on my system and I dealt with it this way.
Mame
-
It would be a helpful feature indeed to have the former associations displayed as some other programs do. One shouldn’t have to jump through hoops to get the installation they want.
-
It would be a helpful feature indeed to have the former associations displayed as some other programs do. One shouldn’t have to jump through hoops to get the installation they want.
Totally Agree By-Tor! Application Developers have started taking this into consideration when designing new software, Just like the ingredients on a food package most end users need to know what’s in it and how it will affect them / their system.
