Navigation

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search
    • Config settings doesn't impact PA behaviour...

      pirrbe

      PA2023 Win10, (same problem with older releases but never reported)
      PA Soft is installed on partition D. (exclusive for installed progs)
      Then I created on my partition G: the folders as configured in PA Settings ‘Folders’.

      0fcf1b09-1b91-4b74-b250-f8cf908a3348-Ashampoo_Snap_maandag 20 maart 2023_11h54m34s.png

      Screenshot 2023-03-20 121152.png

      The problem : Any activity on PA is saved in these folders…
      PA ignores them and still use the default settings. Whats wrong ? Regards, Pirrbe

      Tech Support
    • Missing pdf markups in pdf preview

      L

      I am still using Powerarchiver 2022 and it does not show pdf markups in the preview. Is there a setting to get version 2022 to show pdf markups in the preview? If not, does this work in version 2023?

      Tech Support
    • Question about PA Files...

      T

      The question that I have about PA archives is what happens if say ConeXware, as a company, dies in the future? What happens to any PA files that are created today? Can these files be decompressed with a copy of a PowerArchiver that can no longer phone home to the mothership thus can’t be registered or activated?

      I mean, I can understand that new PA files wouldn’t be able to be created if the program isn’t registered but what about an un-registered copy because well, the question that I posed above?

      It’s questions like this that make me not want to store anything really valuable in PA files out of fear that I, at some point in the future, might lose access to said data inside those files. OK, 7ZIP might not be able to compress as heavily as PA but at least it’s open source and any 7ZIP files will still be able to be read and decompressed ten, twenty, or fifty years from now.

      Tech Support
    • Functions in Windows 11 context menu no longer work after last Windows Update

      T

      For some reason, the PowerArchiver functions in the Windows 11 context menu no longer work after the last Windows Update. Only the functions in the classic context menu function as they should.

      I’ve tried uninstalling PowerArchiver and using RevoUninstaller to remove all bits and pieces that were left behind and did a clean install of PowerArchiver, it didn’t fix the issue. Other items in the Windows 11 context menu work.

      Tech Support
    • Multi Extract doesn't extract in parallel in Windows 11

      Z

      Is this a known problem? Is there a fix coming? This is a primary reason I buy PA.

      I’ve tried both methods I know to extract multiple zips at the same time. 1) Multi Extract feature in the GUI. 2) In Windows File Explorer, select multiple zips, right click, use PA context menu to Extract or Extract To…

      Is there a setting I missed? Or maybe it really is processing in parallel, but I can’t detect it? Nothing tells me in the Processes in Task Manager that multiple PA extracts are running. And my CPU, memory and disk resources do not look like a lot of extracts are running.

      I’m using PA 2022 Standard version 21.00.18 on Windows 11 Pro version 10.0.22621 Build 22621.

      Tech Support
    • Functions in Windows 11 Context Menu don't work in some directories

      P

      In the latest version of PA, on W11 (latest build/SP) when you try to use the first level context menu - NOTHING HAPPENS (particularly when you do this from Downloads or Documents folders) - however I noticed that it DOES WORK when you use the context menu from the Desktop. Going to the second level context menu does work however.

      Tech Support
    • PA 2023 Preview versus PA2022

      pirrbe

      Is the version Preview 2023 also considered to be tested by the testteam ? In the past we got messages in the forum for testing out version x.x, to be downloaded by fastring, or I missed the one for 2023. (I discovered 2023 on the official web…)
      CU, Pirrbe

      .

      Tech Support
    • Missing virtual driver in Patchbeam

      pirrbe

      PA 2023 22.00.08
      Long time no seeing. So I start up the new year with a first problem : the virtual driver cannot be installed. Reason : it is missing in the Fast Ring PatchBeam Update Service…
      Virtual driver PA 2023-01-28 152607.png
      It seems a standard problem with new releases :-)
      Can I have a link or can it be fixed. Thank you. CU later

      Tech Support
    • How to get a registering code?

      N

      Hi there, been a user since 13 years now and in past whenever I had a problem or question I could email, however since 3 weeks it seems like everybody is dead?

      Anyway, as kind of a last resort, I post this email a 4th time but in this forum instead now, in the hope for help:
      "This is the 3rd time I am emailing you guys as I am missing a working code for the preview of Power Archiver 2023

      Can you please help me? I am a 13 years lasting customer of yours, and I am shocked thatr for whatever reason my support tickets are ignored now, why?

      thanks in advance!
      All the best!
      Joerg"

      Tech Support
    • File Explorer Shell Extension crash on Junction

      W

      Re: Explorer.exe Crash on right click

      This appears to be happening again with the Power Archiver 2022 shell extensions.

      When I have Use Explorer Shell Extensions enabled in Power Archiver Configuration and right-click on c:\Users\username\Start Menu, (hidden Junction file), File Explorer crashes.

      I have version 21.00.15 (03/2022) 64-bit installed in Windows 10 Version 21H2 (Build 19044.1826).

      Tech Support
    • PA 21.00.18 Action / Test behaves oddly for me on .PA files

      Brian Gregory

      PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
      I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
      Discovered:
      a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
      b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files.

      Tech Support
    • PA 21.00.18 testing via context menu causes extraction of files

      D

      When the function for testing archives is invoked via the shell context menu (PowerArchiver > Test) then all the files in the archive get extracted to the current folder.

      The test dialog reports as many errors as there are files in the archive but it fails to give any hint as to which files are supposed to be erroneous or what the nature of the problem might be. Comparing the extracted files to the originals shows no differences at all.

      The .7z in question was produced with maximised compression settings in 7zip (taking forever but resulting in smaller archives than .7z produced by PowerArchiver with maximised settings). Therefore I wanted to see whether PowerArchiver can at least test .7z that it produced itself. Hence I had PowerArchiver convert a .pa with the same contents to .7z. There weren’t any errors reported but the resulting .7z contained fewer than half of the files contained in the .pa (137 of 366), so I scratched that test.

      Performance is abysmal when testing via the context menu (e.g. almost 2 minutes for testing a .7z that 7zip tests in 4 seconds), but that is most likely due to the fact that the extracted files are written to disk. Testing the same .7z in the PowerArchiver GUI takes only 8 seconds but causes the mysterious appearance of a UAC dialog, as reported elsewhere.

      The testing function is vital because PowerArchiver has a history of producing archives that it cannot unpack without errors or that do not conform to the respective file format standards (e.g. ZIP) so that other programs report them as erroneous.

      The point of creating archives is that the files in them will most likely have to be extracted at some point. If the extraction cannot be guaranteed to produce correct results then the whole program is absolutely pointless. Actually, worse than pointless - it causes data loss and hence damage.

      Tech Support

    PA cannot compress file in use?

    Tech Support
    11
    27
    19118
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      Ricco last edited by

      Sorry that I don’t know if this issue has been held or not… Currently I wanna compress a MP3 album folder and PA compress all files perfectly EXCEPT the file is being played by Winamp. I’ve checked the “Configuration” and didn’t find any option to solve this. Using WinRAR as a comparison, it works without any problem. Is there any method to overcome this issue? :confused:

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        klumy last edited by

        NO, PA doesn’t support this feature.

        But I hope it will support it in the future

        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          Ricco @klumy last edited by

          I also hope PA would support this, too… The file in-use should only be locked for “writing” and “appending”. I think this function could be implemented with not much effort.

          spwolf 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • spwolf
            spwolf conexware @Ricco last edited by

            Hi,

            If you use 7zip format, it will work just fine.

            thanks,

            K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              klumy @spwolf last edited by

              it should work for all formats ;)

              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                Ricco @klumy last edited by

                Yes, but I usually use ZIP for archiving due to the efficiency. So, if 7-Zip format works in this way, why not ZIP? ;)

                D spwolf 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  davidsplash @Ricco last edited by

                  the reason is simple zip has to be compatible with other zip programs and changing the zip format will take time its not that pa can’t do this its just that way boither when a better format 7-zip which is still being developed with no restrictions on what the format can do. Zip is not really being developed and to chage it would make it uncompatible with all the zip programs around. Unless you can pursuade the big archive gives to support this new zip format.

                  R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R
                    Ricco @davidsplash last edited by

                    davidsplash,

                    What format would be changed? I don’t mean ZIP has to become 7-Zip. I just ask if PA can compress file in-use when using 7-Zip profile, why don’t PA compress file in-use when ZIP profile is used?
                    Would there be any misunderstanding made?

                    (Supp. information: In my first post, I do mean WinRAR can archive files which are in-use using ZIP profile but not RAR. Therefore, ZIP file format and structure won’t be changed even ZIPPing files in-used.)

                    Ricco

                    C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      Carlospr @Ricco last edited by

                      I understand what Ricco means.

                      Sometimes I like to compress a little program in use that I’m developing and send it to a FTP location.

                      PA didn’t compress it using zip profile.

                      So I had to use 7-zip to do the job with the same file type: zip.

                      This limitation of PA’s zip is really annoying…

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • spwolf
                        spwolf conexware @Ricco last edited by

                        @Ricco:

                        Yes, but I usually use ZIP for archiving due to the efficiency. So, if 7-Zip format works in this way, why not ZIP? ;)

                        because our zip engine does not support it, and it wont support it anytime soon due to possibility of your files not getting archived properly when in use.

                        It is an limitation of zip engine that we use. If it bugs you, I suggest that you use 7zip format. It is fast on lower compression methods…

                        regards,

                        R K J 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • R
                          Ricco @spwolf last edited by

                          Thanks for your notification! But I still hope it could be solved earlier. :)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            klumy @spwolf last edited by

                            @spwolf:

                            because our zip engine does not support it, and it wont support it anytime soon due to possibility of your files not getting archived properly when in use.

                            It is an limitation of zip engine that we use. If it bugs you, I suggest that you use 7zip format. It is fast on lower compression methods…

                            regards,

                            but WinRAR DOES support this feature :rolleyes:

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              jowood @spwolf last edited by

                              @spwolf:

                              because our zip engine does not support it, and it wont support it anytime soon due to possibility of your files not getting archived properly when in use.

                              It is an limitation of zip engine that we use. If it bugs you, I suggest that you use 7zip format. It is fast on lower compression methods…

                              regards,

                              Then you should upgrade you ZIP engine as soon as possible. Didn’t you say that you always use the best components available on the market? Nearly every compression program can skip files in use.

                              R spwolf 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • R
                                Ricco @jowood last edited by

                                Or even, if source is provided, update the source of the ZIP engine would be a faster approach.

                                G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • G
                                  gorant @Ricco last edited by

                                  What about the Command line PACOMP? Are files in use being skipped there as well?

                                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • spwolf
                                    spwolf conexware @jowood last edited by

                                    @jowood:

                                    Then you should upgrade you ZIP engine as soon as possible. Didn’t you say that you always use the best components available on the market? Nearly every compression program can skip files in use.

                                    there is no better than what we use… It is simply an limitation of current PA zip support, it can not be “fixed” or added quickly.

                                    I can only suggest that you use 7zip format if you run into these kind of problems.

                                    regards,

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • R
                                      Ricco @spwolf last edited by

                                      I have a suggestion. You may consider it as “Wish List” instead of Support…

                                      I suggest that PA should develop a ZIP engine instead of relying on third-party components. It’s quite hard to develop from something raw and therefore I think it’s not bad to purchase the source of the ZIP engine which is now used by PA. Afterward, PA can amend the source and add any new feature (such as ZIP-ing file in-use) without waiting the third party.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • D
                                        davidsplash @gorant last edited by

                                        a warning should be issuesed when files in use.

                                        However i tested winrar and it does do what you say though it looses a bit on zip compression doing so. pa has better compression on zip than any other zip proigram. why not use 7zip instaed for this type of work. as I said before zip was not designed to be used like that. 7zip was.

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M
                                          mwb1100 @davidsplash last edited by

                                          @davidsplash:

                                          as I said before zip was not designed to be used like that. 7zip was.

                                          This has nothing to do with the target archive file formats - it only has to do with how the component that is opening the file to be compressed makes the file open request to Windows.

                                          K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • K
                                            klumy @mwb1100 last edited by

                                            It should be better if you make your Vote for this feature request in the Wish forum ;)

                                            http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=900

                                            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • S
                                              spot @klumy last edited by

                                              hm, can anyone tell my how to change from zip to 7zip if i use backup express. i can only choose zip, lha etc. but not 7zip?

                                              TBGBe 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                              • TBGBe
                                                TBGBe @spot last edited by

                                                @spot:

                                                hm, can anyone tell my how to change from zip to 7zip if i use backup express. i can only choose zip, lha etc. but not 7zip?

                                                You cannot use 7z within PA BAckup Express (yet).

                                                http://www.powerarchiver.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1259

                                                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                • S
                                                  spot @TBGBe last edited by

                                                  i see - then it’s very confusing that someone recommends to use 7zip format to support compressing locked files. so i can’t use 7zip in backup and also locked files are not supported (because i can’t switch from zip to 7zip in backup mode). right?

                                                  TBGBe 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                  • TBGBe
                                                    TBGBe @spot last edited by

                                                    Well yes, but Backup Express is “normally” used for archiving (e.g. overnight). So then files are not in use.

                                                    As requested by Ricco - the advice to use 7z was for compression tasks using PA or shell extensions, such as compressing MP3 file whilst it is being played.

                                                    For Backup Express, you could use TAR.GZ, TAR.Bz2 or even BlakHole compression. These do allow working with “files in use”.
                                                    Also the compression will “probably” still be better than ZIP format - but not 7zip (of course this depends on what is being compressed).

                                                    S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                    • S
                                                      spot @TBGBe last edited by

                                                      ok, tar.gzip worked. thanks!

                                                      G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                      • G
                                                        greeny @spot last edited by

                                                        Hi guys, I also complained about this a long time ago and with the new update v9.63.02 found that some of the files in use are added to ZIP correctly when highlighted and Right Mouse button-> Compress with Options is performed :)

                                                        However some files are skipped when using the Drag-and-drop in PA or using the PA graphical user interface to Add to a new archive :confused:

                                                        What is the difference ?

                                                        spwolf 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                        • spwolf
                                                          spwolf conexware @greeny last edited by

                                                          @greeny:

                                                          Hi guys, I also complained about this a long time ago and with the new update v9.63.02 found that some of the files in use are added to ZIP correctly when highlighted and Right Mouse button-> Compress with Options is performed :)

                                                          However some files are skipped when using the Drag-and-drop in PA or using the PA graphical user interface to Add to a new archive :confused:

                                                          What is the difference ?

                                                          there shouldnt be any difference, it was never added.

                                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                          • First post
                                                            Last post