<![CDATA[Paop]]>Will you all still be supporting PAOP, or will everything eventually have to move to ZTE?

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/topic/4800/paopRSS for NodeTue, 14 Jul 2026 00:40:20 GMTSun, 22 Jul 2012 12:16:29 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Paop on Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:40:38 GMT]]>It is an item on the ribbon, which is nice.

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29078https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29078Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:40:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paop on Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:51:57 GMT]]>ZTE uses Toobars for options and settings, right? :-)

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29077https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29077Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:51:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paop on Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:47:59 GMT]]>I recently switched from 2007 to 2010.

There really isn’t any differences, but the settings for PAOP in 2010 at a bit hard to find. Having found them the same.

And I was wrong . . . there is no SFX option. I thought there was.

That would be nice since some people don’t have archive programs.

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29076https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29076Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:47:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paop on Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:34:59 GMT]]>what office version are you using? as there are big differences in look and feel in office 2010 for instance.

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29075https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29075Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:34:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paop on Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:44:58 GMT]]>Thanks.

True. You might add the attachment cloud in PAOP for those who want it.

I was thinking PAOP actually had one option PAOP didn’t have – to create an sfx file.

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29074https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29074Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:44:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paop on Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:23:14 GMT]]>@Socrates:

I would urge that you keep supporting PAOP.

ZTE has one really unique thing: the attachment cloud. Nothing else, really.

And I would use it so irregularly (and, if the file is unusually large, I could ftp it to a server where someone can download it.

But since it already includes compression engines, it seems to clutter the system . . . and might eventually cause problems.

So please do keep PAOP.

paop is not going anywhere… but will paop be simpler version of ZTE? or will it be ZTE that uses PA only?

Not sure yet… right now we prefer it as simpler version, because it simply works.

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29073https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29073Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:23:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paop on Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:24:25 GMT]]>Good argument is don’t fix what isn’t broken. :-) but who is to say they may keep. oap as a freeware and zte as a plus service. Only time will tell.

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29069https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29069Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:24:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paop on Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:41:38 GMT]]>I would urge that you keep supporting PAOP.

ZTE has one really unique thing: the attachment cloud. Nothing else, really.

And I would use it so irregularly (and, if the file is unusually large, I could ftp it to a server where someone can download it.

But since it already includes compression engines, it seems to clutter the system . . . and might eventually cause problems.

So please do keep PAOP.

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29068https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29068Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:41:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paop on Sun, 22 Jul 2012 19:43:49 GMT]]>Good question, I do believe when ZTE is fully working and the attachment cloud service is live this service will replace the current Outlook Plugin.

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29067https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/29067Sun, 22 Jul 2012 19:43:49 GMT