<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Recovery request]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">could we have a better recovery solution to archives. The zip recovery is not as effective as some of pas rivals. How about using par2 format in program when creating archives to aid recovery of archive</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/topic/4604/recovery-request</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 20:39:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forums.powerarchiver.com/topic/4604.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 07:56:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Recovery request on Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:54:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/davidsplash" aria-label="Profile: davidsplash">@<bdi>davidsplash</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">could we have a better recovery solution to archives. The zip recovery is not as effective as some of pas rivals. How about using par2 format in program when creating archives to aid recovery of archive</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I am keen for this to be expanded on! Anything that brings PA up to the level other brands are on is a good thing and its relating to archive’s so its not like were going off track.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/27282</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/27282</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[RJWaring]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:54:24 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>