<![CDATA[Drag-n-drop == extract button]]>Currently, dragging a file from the archive to the destination folder results in the file being extracted to windows temp folder and then copied to destination, which is much slower than when extracted with the Extract button, which extracts straight to the destination folder.

I, for one, would like to see drag-n-drop extract directly to destination as well, as that’s the method I like to use.

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/topic/3438/drag-n-drop-extract-buttonRSS for NodeSun, 17 May 2026 14:17:59 GMTSun, 15 Mar 2009 11:45:21 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Drag-n-drop == extract button on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:05:08 GMT]]>That’s too bad… Otherwise it’s a great product, anyway. Thanks for the quick reply!

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/19804https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/19804Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:05:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Drag-n-drop == extract button on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:38:27 GMT]]>sure, but it wont work in Vista and Windows 7.
Thats how it worked before Vista was introduced.

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/19803https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/19803Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:38:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Drag-n-drop == extract button on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:06:58 GMT]]>I’m wondering, isn’t it possible to only get the target path from drag-n-drop event and then just send it to the extraction algorithm so it would literally do the exact same thing as the Extract button?

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/19802https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/19802Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:06:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Drag-n-drop == extract button on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:53:41 GMT]]>thats not possible, because some of the Windows operating systems do not allow this (Vista, Windows 7)

]]>https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/19801https://forums.powerarchiver.com/post/19801Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:53:41 GMT