-
For some reason, the PowerArchiver functions in the Windows 11 context menu no longer work after the last Windows Update. Only the functions in the classic context menu function as they should.
I’ve tried uninstalling PowerArchiver and using RevoUninstaller to remove all bits and pieces that were left behind and did a clean install of PowerArchiver, it didn’t fix the issue. Other items in the Windows 11 context menu work.
-
PA 21.00.18 running on Windows 7 64 bit.
I made a big .PA file and thought I’d check it was made correctly with Menu / Actions / Test.
Discovered:
a) PA always issues a UAC prompt to do this!
b) PA always says there are many errors in PA files. -
I installed powarc-macos20001.dmg and I am attempting to create a password protected zip file. When I create the zip in the UI it doesn’t write the file to the destination folder. No error message is displayed. The PA app has full folder permission. I’m new to Mac, but have been running PA on Windows for a long time.
Will there be a new version of the Mac version soon?
-
Hi! I came across an issue when I tried to uninstall PowerArch 2013. I got an error “The specified account already exists” which broke the process. I got the same error when I tried to install the current version, without uninstalling the previous one.
So I can’t uninstall and I can’t install PowerArchiver. Any suggestions? OS Windows 8.1 x64.Dariusz
-
Where are various settings store . . . e.g. ftp, etc.
-
d40b03ac-1a7a-4358-8d6c-0ec7f455de04-image.png
should the image have a white background?
-
Re: Explorer.exe Crash on right click
This appears to be happening again with the Power Archiver 2022 shell extensions.
When I have Use Explorer Shell Extensions enabled in Power Archiver Configuration and right-click on c:\Users\username\Start Menu, (hidden Junction file), File Explorer crashes.
I have version 21.00.15 (03/2022) 64-bit installed in Windows 10 Version 21H2 (Build 19044.1826).
-
Powerarchiver 2022
Right-click and select Encrypt on a folder does not work.
Although it says it encrypts, there is no encrypted file in the destination folder. -
The online update feature within the program suggests there is a later version than the ‘.17’ available on the web site. But clicking either download or update just reinstalls version .17.
Either there isn’t an update OR
the “download” and 'update" links should be repaired. -
Hi Dear,
Cannot login and request resend license code for my fd
-
Hi,
When you click on the Buy Now link, you come across four tabs - Home or Work, Enterprise Unlimited, Educational Discount, & Gift Discount.
What is the difference between a licence purchased via Gift Discount and a Home/Work licence?
Also, how can I renew the PowerArchiver Select plan a year after the purchase? Will it remind me automatically?
Best,
-
I’m running PA 21.00.17 64-bit on a 64-bit i7 desktop with W10 Pro, latest version. This 32gb of installed RAM.
As I use the PA pbs system for a number of scheduled archiving operations throughout the day, PA Starter is set to load and run at system startup.
In the course of trying to identify some causes of slowness and bottlenecks in other processes, I notice that PA Starter (PAS) always runs at between 11% and 15% of CPU (see screenshot), usually at about 12-13%. This is by far the highest demanding process on the system, as shown by Task Manager. In Performance Monitor, PAS Average CPU is 8.32, with every other process at less that 1 i.e. in decimal places only.
Task Manager also shows PAS Power Usage as “Very High”, and is the only process shown thus.
I have looked again at the information about PAS at https://wiki.powerarchiver.com/en:help:details:powerarchiver_starter, which was last modified in 2016. The article states a low memory usage for PAS of 784k, which is fair enough, but it is the large CPU overhead which is of concern.
It is of course possible to change the PAS priority, but this has no effect on CPU overhead.
However, is it possible to change PAS, which is required only at intervals to initiate PA scheduled tasks, from consuming so much system resource for every moment of the day?
PA Starter.jpg
-
I’m experiencing very slow extraction speed of multipart RAR files. For the first part the extraction is super fast but when PA reaches the part2.rar the extraction from there on gets super slow. PA needed for a 6,3 GB multipart archive 30 minutes to extract. I tested then with another program and it just took 70 seconds. I had this slow extraction speed with PA for quite a long time and I always thought that is maybe because of a high compression rate that the extraction would take longer. But it seems that only PA gets that slow.
I have lots of multipart archives that are 10+ GB and with PA it would be really time consuming. Is there any solution to this?
PA cannot compress file in use?
-
Sorry that I don’t know if this issue has been held or not… Currently I wanna compress a MP3 album folder and PA compress all files perfectly EXCEPT the file is being played by Winamp. I’ve checked the “Configuration” and didn’t find any option to solve this. Using WinRAR as a comparison, it works without any problem. Is there any method to overcome this issue? :confused:
-
NO, PA doesn’t support this feature.
But I hope it will support it in the future
-
I also hope PA would support this, too… The file in-use should only be locked for “writing” and “appending”. I think this function could be implemented with not much effort.
-
Hi,
If you use 7zip format, it will work just fine.
thanks,
-
it should work for all formats ;)
-
Yes, but I usually use ZIP for archiving due to the efficiency. So, if 7-Zip format works in this way, why not ZIP? ;)
-
the reason is simple zip has to be compatible with other zip programs and changing the zip format will take time its not that pa can’t do this its just that way boither when a better format 7-zip which is still being developed with no restrictions on what the format can do. Zip is not really being developed and to chage it would make it uncompatible with all the zip programs around. Unless you can pursuade the big archive gives to support this new zip format.
-
davidsplash,
What format would be changed? I don’t mean ZIP has to become 7-Zip. I just ask if PA can compress file in-use when using 7-Zip profile, why don’t PA compress file in-use when ZIP profile is used?
Would there be any misunderstanding made?(Supp. information: In my first post, I do mean WinRAR can archive files which are in-use using ZIP profile but not RAR. Therefore, ZIP file format and structure won’t be changed even ZIPPing files in-used.)
Ricco
-
I understand what Ricco means.
Sometimes I like to compress a little program in use that I’m developing and send it to a FTP location.
PA didn’t compress it using zip profile.
So I had to use 7-zip to do the job with the same file type: zip.
This limitation of PA’s zip is really annoying…
-
Yes, but I usually use ZIP for archiving due to the efficiency. So, if 7-Zip format works in this way, why not ZIP? ;)
because our zip engine does not support it, and it wont support it anytime soon due to possibility of your files not getting archived properly when in use.
It is an limitation of zip engine that we use. If it bugs you, I suggest that you use 7zip format. It is fast on lower compression methods…
regards,
-
Thanks for your notification! But I still hope it could be solved earlier. :)
-
because our zip engine does not support it, and it wont support it anytime soon due to possibility of your files not getting archived properly when in use.
It is an limitation of zip engine that we use. If it bugs you, I suggest that you use 7zip format. It is fast on lower compression methods…
regards,
but WinRAR DOES support this feature :rolleyes:
-
because our zip engine does not support it, and it wont support it anytime soon due to possibility of your files not getting archived properly when in use.
It is an limitation of zip engine that we use. If it bugs you, I suggest that you use 7zip format. It is fast on lower compression methods…
regards,
Then you should upgrade you ZIP engine as soon as possible. Didn’t you say that you always use the best components available on the market? Nearly every compression program can skip files in use.
-
Or even, if source is provided, update the source of the ZIP engine would be a faster approach.
-
What about the Command line PACOMP? Are files in use being skipped there as well?
-
Then you should upgrade you ZIP engine as soon as possible. Didn’t you say that you always use the best components available on the market? Nearly every compression program can skip files in use.
there is no better than what we use… It is simply an limitation of current PA zip support, it can not be “fixed” or added quickly.
I can only suggest that you use 7zip format if you run into these kind of problems.
regards,
-
I have a suggestion. You may consider it as “Wish List” instead of Support…
I suggest that PA should develop a ZIP engine instead of relying on third-party components. It’s quite hard to develop from something raw and therefore I think it’s not bad to purchase the source of the ZIP engine which is now used by PA. Afterward, PA can amend the source and add any new feature (such as ZIP-ing file in-use) without waiting the third party.
-
a warning should be issuesed when files in use.
However i tested winrar and it does do what you say though it looses a bit on zip compression doing so. pa has better compression on zip than any other zip proigram. why not use 7zip instaed for this type of work. as I said before zip was not designed to be used like that. 7zip was.
-
as I said before zip was not designed to be used like that. 7zip was.
This has nothing to do with the target archive file formats - it only has to do with how the component that is opening the file to be compressed makes the file open request to Windows.
-
It should be better if you make your Vote for this feature request in the Wish forum ;)
-
hm, can anyone tell my how to change from zip to 7zip if i use backup express. i can only choose zip, lha etc. but not 7zip?
-
hm, can anyone tell my how to change from zip to 7zip if i use backup express. i can only choose zip, lha etc. but not 7zip?
You cannot use 7z within PA BAckup Express (yet).
-
i see - then it’s very confusing that someone recommends to use 7zip format to support compressing locked files. so i can’t use 7zip in backup and also locked files are not supported (because i can’t switch from zip to 7zip in backup mode). right?
-
Well yes, but Backup Express is “normally” used for archiving (e.g. overnight). So then files are not in use.
As requested by Ricco - the advice to use 7z was for compression tasks using PA or shell extensions, such as compressing MP3 file whilst it is being played.
For Backup Express, you could use TAR.GZ, TAR.Bz2 or even BlakHole compression. These do allow working with “files in use”.
Also the compression will “probably” still be better than ZIP format - but not 7zip (of course this depends on what is being compressed). -
ok, tar.gzip worked. thanks!
-
Hi guys, I also complained about this a long time ago and with the new update v9.63.02 found that some of the files in use are added to ZIP correctly when highlighted and Right Mouse button-> Compress with Options is performed :)
However some files are skipped when using the Drag-and-drop in PA or using the PA graphical user interface to Add to a new archive :confused:
What is the difference ?
-
Hi guys, I also complained about this a long time ago and with the new update v9.63.02 found that some of the files in use are added to ZIP correctly when highlighted and Right Mouse button-> Compress with Options is performed :)
However some files are skipped when using the Drag-and-drop in PA or using the PA graphical user interface to Add to a new archive :confused:
What is the difference ?
there shouldnt be any difference, it was never added.
